Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Wachovia pays $160 million to stop drugs probe
#1
Wachovia pays $160 million to stop drugs probe


By Agence France-Presse
Thursday, March 18th, 2010 -- 8:50 am


Wachovia has agreed to pay US prosecutors 160 million dollars for its failure to stop drug money being laundered to Mexican affiliates, the DEA said Wednesday.
The embattled bank admitted it failed to stop an estimated 110 million dollars from being sent from the US to Mexico by wire transfer that was used to buy cocaine-transporting aircraft.
The Drug Enforcement Administration said Wachovia-run foreign exchange houses in Mexico -- or casas de cambio (CDCs) -- were involved in the illicit trades between 2004 and 2007.
At least four aircraft bought with the cash were later seized along with large quantities of cocaine, by unnamed foreign governments.
The DEA said the bank had agreed to pay the fine to "resolve charges that it willfully failed to establish an anti-money laundering program.""In light of Wachovia's willingness to acknowledge responsibility for its actions and omissions... the government has agreed to defer prosecution of the criminal charge in the information for 12 months," the agency said.
Wachovia, which was taken over by Wells Fargo in a crisis-inspired fire sale in 2008, was given five days to pay the fine.
Although Wachovia admitted that 110 million dollars could have been laundered, the DEA said "Wachovia failed to effectively monitor for potential money laundering activity more than 420 billion dollars in financial transactions with the CDCs."


MORE:

CURT ANDERSON
AP News: Mar 17, 2010 17:23 EDT


Banking giant Wachovia Corp. will pay $160 million to settle a federal investigation into laundering of illegal drug profits through Mexican exchange houses in the largest case of its kind ever brought against a U.S. bank, prosecutors said Wednesday.

"This is historic," acting U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Sloman said. "There is no other case like this one anywhere."

The probe, which began in 2005 when a Drug Enforcement Administration narcotics dog in Florida detected cocaine traces in an airplane, ultimately uncovered at least $110 million in drug profits laundered from Mexico through Wachovia. The total settlement includes forfeiture in that amount plus a $50 million fine.

"DEA will follow drug money wherever it leads us," said Mark R. Trouville, chief of the DEA's Miami office.

The agreement means Wachovia and its executives will avoid criminal prosecution in return for the $160 million payment and significant improvements in its anti-money laundering program. If those and other conditions are met within one year, potential criminal charges for failure to maintain a system to detect money launderers will be dropped.

Wachovia, now a unit of San Francisco-based Wells Fargo & Co., said in a statement that Wells Fargo had already set aside money to pay the settlement. The statement said Wachovia, based in Charlotte, ended its relationships with foreign currency exchange houses in 2008.

"Wachovia Bank has fully cooperated with the federal government throughout the course of its investigation," the statement said.

The $160 million fine and forfeiture represents the biggest penalty ever imposed under the Bank Secrecy Act, which requires financial institutions to keep close tabs on suspicious transactions that could indicate money is being laundered from criminal enterprises. According to prosecutors, Wachovia's program was woefully inadequate and bank executives knew it, meaning that numerous red flags were missed over a three-year period.

In fact, officials said Wachovia had no way of checking some $420 billion in transactions from Mexican exchange houses for possible money-laundering activity. That means investigators didn't get potentially key information on drug cartels, terrorist financing networks and other organized crime enterprises.

"The integrity of our financial system is at stake," said Charles Steele, deputy director of the Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network. "It poses a very serious problem, a very serious threat for law enforcement.


Beginning with that DEA drug-sniffing dog in June 2005, investigators began tracing the source of money for airplanes being used to ferry cocaine in Colombia and Mexico that was ultimately destined for the U.S. Those initial money transfers were overseen by a Wachovia office in Miami.


Ultimately at least $13 million from the Mexican exchanges went through Wachovia for the purchase of aircraft, according to court documents. Four of them were seized by investigators, along with more than 22 tons of cocaine.

From there, investigators from the DEA, Internal Revenue Service and other agencies tracked billions of dollars in wire transfers, bulk cash shipments and other transactions from the Mexican exchanges through Wachovia. Many were considered suspicious, including such tactics as multiple round-number wire transfers on the same day for a single account; deposits of traveler's checks with sequential numbers that contain unusual markings; and bulk cash transfers up to 50 percent larger than a customer had led Wachovia to expect.

Under the agreement, Wells Fargo cannot use taxpayer money provided under the federal financial bailout program — known as TARP — to pay its fine and forfeiture amounts. A Wachovia spokewoman said Wells Fargo fully repaid its TARP money to the government in late 2009, before the money-laundering settlement was finalized.

Source: AP News
http://rawstory.com/2010/03/wachovia-pay...ugs-probe/
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"
Reply
#2
It never ceases to amaze me how, over the decades, it has become a law unenforcement standard that sees big business breaking the law only having a fine is imposed -- whereas the rest of us would be imprisoned for a similar offense.

The fact is that fining big business is hardly a punishment. The fine doesn't come out of the executives pocket. They don't suffer. Their names are not even made public. In fact, If anyone suffers from this crazy arsebackwards situation, it is the shareholders who are guilty of not a thing.

In other words big business have been granted an automatic get out of jail card.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The CIA, Nugan Hand, Drugs, And An Australian Killer Cop Magda Hassan 6 42,479 22-08-2016, 07:36 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  UN report: These maps show how dangerous illegal drugs flow around the globe (link) Drew Phipps 0 7,485 05-07-2016, 01:26 PM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  Drugs & The Dark Quadrant David Guyatt 0 8,906 05-04-2016, 04:00 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Drugs as weapon of war Magda Hassan 0 8,785 22-02-2015, 01:20 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  BBC reporter downwind from burning drugs David Guyatt 1 9,254 27-12-2014, 12:46 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Drug Trafficking as Strategic Intelligence The CIA & Drugs, Inc.: a Covert History by DOUG VALENTINE Magda Hassan 0 7,446 09-11-2014, 01:36 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Scientists Suggest Fresh Look at Psychedelic Drugs Keith Millea 21 14,097 08-04-2013, 08:42 PM
Last Post: Jan Klimkowski
  Parterns in Crime: The US Secret State and Mexico's "War on Drugs" Ed Jewett 3 7,502 18-01-2013, 11:52 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  Alzheimer’s disease, 'statin drugs', and an FDA warning Adele Edisen 6 7,284 04-08-2012, 12:08 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  The Pentagon's Privatization of the War on Drugs Ed Jewett 1 4,024 18-01-2012, 05:27 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)