Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
JFK and RFK: The Plots that Killed Them, The Patsies that Didn't
#41
I should add that after a local lecture, I personally talked to
OJ attorney Alan Dershowitz and told him my theory that
Jason was the killer. He appeared startled. Pausing and choosing
his words carefully, he said only "WELL, HE WAS THE ONLY
SUSPECT WITHOUT AN ALIBI."

If you have time, watch Bill Dear's video.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...946122795#

Jack
Reply
#42
I would also ask Jim whether he has read JASON'S DIARY,
which Dear obtained from a storage locker where Jason
had stashed it an abandoned it for unpaid rent. If not, then
Jim is not familiar with ALL the evidence.

Jack
Reply
#43
The only suspect without an alibi EXCEPT FOR O.J., of course. And
bear in mind the evidence I have cited remains part of the evidence,
which is going to be difficult to overcome, no matter what else this
guy has come up with. The video runs two hours, so I will take a
look when I have time--which might even be this weekend. And if
he also studied Lee Oswald, what did he come up with about him?

Jack White Wrote:I should add that after a local lecture, I personally talked to
OJ attorney Alan Dershowitz and told him my theory that
Jason was the killer. He appeared startled. Pausing and choosing
his words carefully, he said only "WELL, HE WAS THE ONLY
SUSPECT WITHOUT AN ALIBI."

If you have time, watch Bill Dear's video.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...946122795#

Jack
Reply
#44
James H. Fetzer Wrote:The only suspect without an alibi EXCEPT FOR O.J., of course. And
bear in mind the evidence I have cited remains part of the evidence,
which is going to be difficult to overcome, no matter what else this
guy has come up with. The video runs two hours, so I will take a
look when I have time--which might even be this weekend. And if
he also studied Lee Oswald, what did he come up with about him?

Jack White Wrote:I should add that after a local lecture, I personally talked to
OJ attorney Alan Dershowitz and told him my theory that
Jason was the killer. He appeared startled. Pausing and choosing
his words carefully, he said only "WELL, HE WAS THE ONLY
SUSPECT WITHOUT AN ALIBI."

If you have time, watch Bill Dear's video.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...946122795#

Jack

The video runs only 80 minutes. It has extensive new evidence,
including the murder weapon. You really ought to look at it to
understand the case. Dear hopes that Jason sues him, because
he could then depose him.

Dear could likely solve the LHO affair, given the same 12 years
he pursued Jason. Coincidentally, 12 years is the same length of
time Armstrong took to nail down the LHO story.

Thanks for considering this.

Jack
Reply
#45
I urge all to watch Bill Dear's video

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=...946122795#

...to see how an investigation ought to be conducted.

I would like to hear comments from those who watch.

Jack
Reply
#46
Jack,
I watched it.Dear comes up with some pretty darn good evidence that Jason was the murderer.I would say that he should have been the lead suspect.It's hard to imagine why he wasn't.He does speculate on some things though in his recreation of the plot..I'll also say that I didn't watch the OJ trial,so I don't know all the details of that circus.
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
Buckminster Fuller
Reply
#47
Jack White:


Thanks for that. The evidence is pretty damning and the watchcap is usually good enough for a grand jury.




Points:


The cap had to be covered in Jason's DNA. This begs the question whether the Los Angeles District Attorney's office is denying a re-opening of the case because of its complicity in hiding evidence? A criminal conflict of interest.

It struck me that Jason could have spoken to OJ before he drove over to Nicole's and gotten worked-up by OJ.


The medical examiner Lee mumbles something about other hairs besides OJ's being found at the scene. (Gee, I wonder if they were Jason's?)


Jason, being enraged and having snapped from whatever confrontation happened with Nicole, could have had Ron Goldman walk into view. It could be it suddenly dawned on Jason that Goldman's little rendezvous with Nicole was the reason why she canceled the family get-together at Jackson's. This would account for killing rage.


Perhaps Jason didn't track any blood because it hadn't spread out when he was there.


There's interesting ethical questions here. A (most-likely) innocent man sits in jail right now on shamefully trumped-up charges.


My first instinct when this happened was OJ was set-up by blackmailers. I wasn't too far off.
Reply
#48
I remember clear as day from 1994 that there was a "mystery witness" who said they saw a dark hispanic man running from the walkway. The general consensus was this was another case of blame it on a black man scapegoating and was met with a "yeah, sure, nice try." But now that I think of it Jason could easily be seen as a dark-skinned hispanic.

That mystery witness obviously saw Jason. This case is a good example of public bias. But, on the other hand, it is also a good example of jurisprudence. In the end the jury made the correct decision.
Reply
#49
As I have posted before, I am going to watch this video presentation of the evidence that Jack finds convincing about Jason. At the point in time, having squandered a sabbatical on watching the trial and the discussions on Geraldo's show, I have been impressed by the blood at the scene, in the Bronco, leading up to OJ's house and in his shower drain. None of that was ever refuted. And OJ had a hair-trigger temper, was obsessed with Nicole, paranoid about her having a relationship with anyone else, and was probably high on meth. If Jason was there, he was accompanying OJ, who might have used him as a lookout just in case anyone came up to the condo. Jason might have had no idea that OJ could actually kill them. OJ had the physical strength and the visceral hatred to have performed a slaughter of this magnitude. I will be stunned if the same were true of Jason. I will watch the video, but it's going to take a lot to convince me. And even if Jason was there, OJ would obviously have still been complicit in the crime.
Reply
#50
Quote: OJ had the physical strength and the visceral hatred to have performed a slaughter of this magnitude. I will be stunned if the same were true of Jason.

Prepare to be stunned James.
"You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete.”
Buckminster Fuller
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Another Confirmation Malcolm-X Killed by FBI/NYPD conspiracy Peter Lemkin 2 2,623 27-02-2021, 04:46 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Professor of nuclear physics killed in bomb blast in Tehran Carsten Wiethoff 16 17,189 11-08-2016, 05:59 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  What Killed Arafat? Keith Millea 106 40,609 07-08-2014, 02:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  8 Most Bizarre Presidential Assassination Plots Marlene Zenker 3 5,952 09-06-2014, 05:21 PM
Last Post: Scott Kaiser
  Dag Hammarskjöld killed by Belgian mercenary pilot? Ivan De Mey 3 5,091 09-04-2014, 05:31 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Brazil’s Ex-President Kubitschek Killed by US-Backed Regime Magda Hassan 1 7,222 14-12-2013, 06:15 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Who killed George Polk? Tracy Riddle 0 3,374 01-06-2013, 04:14 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  The Plot that Killed Gandhi Jim DiEugenio 0 3,002 17-07-2012, 10:03 PM
Last Post: Jim DiEugenio
  Latin America mourns Cabral’s death - Argentinian Leftist Singer Killed in Guatamala. Peter Lemkin 4 7,486 12-07-2011, 07:43 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Sunny Sheu Killed after reporting death threat from Judge Joseph Golia Magda Hassan 4 4,853 01-07-2011, 08:43 PM
Last Post: Ed Jewett

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)