Jimi Hendrix Murder - 40 years ago - The 'Experience'!

[Greg Burnham]

Reading Dragoo above gave me a rush, a contact high.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Those_Were_the_Days_(song)

Me too. Anybody else wanna hit?

[Albert Doyle]

Reading Dragoo above gave me a rush, a contact high.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Those_Were_the_Days_(song)

Me too. Anybody else wanna hit?

I wish people would take this topic seriously. This is a serious, deep murder scandal equal to that of the notorious assassinations this website specializes in. I'm not trying to be humorless, but this is a serious case that hasn't received serious attention from the people it deserves. We've developed a serious body of evidence to prove Jimi Hendrix was murdered, and most likely for political reasons. To make a joke out of it is only to serve those who have managed to prevent its exposure and their agenda.

[Greg Burnham]

Reading Dragoo above gave me a rush, a contact high.... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Those_Were_the_Days_(song)

Me too. Anybody else wanna hit?

I wish people would take this topic seriously. This is a serious, deep murder scandal equal to that of the notorious assassinations this website specializes in. I'm not trying to be humorless, but this is a serious case that hasn't received serious attention from the people it deserves. We've developed a serious body of evidence to prove Jimi Hendrix was murdered, and most likely for political reasons. To make a joke out of it is only to serve those who have managed to prevent its exposure and their agenda.

Albert,

Although there was intentional humor in my post, it was minimal, and it was not meant to diminish your point. Quite the contrary. I found Phil's post intoxicatingly insightful and I highly recommend it to others.

[Peter Lemkin]

It is my belief that JH was assassinated for his anti-establishment version of the Star Spangled Banner [coupled with his popularity].......which to the 'mentality' of those who assassinated him, was beyond the pale.....

....it also was to demoralize the growing Movement against the Establishment, at the time, by decimating all of their heroes and icons - one by one. And it was done. Quite effectively, one must hand it to 'them'. :darthvader:

[Albert Doyle]

For those of you who don't know, Caesar Glebbeek, a major European Hendrix archivist and source, and owner of Hendrix-based UniVibes Magazine, has put out a publication claiming to have "debunked the murder nonsense once and for all". The magazine-like publication entitled 'Until We Meet Again' was released this September and claims to be a thorough inside investigation of the murder claims, with the intention of disproving the claim that Jimi was murdered. Never in my life have I ever seen such a pitiful and wickedly-dishonest attempt at spinning facts and distorting evidence. For this to have come from someone who claims to be a major Hendrix source and relator of accurate Hendrix history to the public is an outrage and qualifies at the Judas level for wicked betrayal. What Caesar has done here is unbelievably indescribable. He's gone and twisted facts and distorted context, as well as deliberately omitting key qualifying information. His overlying premise is trying to justify Monika Dannemann and her original story given to the British Inquest. This story is well-known amongst all credible sources to be a complete fabrication and cover-up of the true facts, yet Caesar Glebbeek has the unbelievable nerve to dare defend this account and promote it as true thus proving the falseness of the murder claims. I can't conceive of a more evil betrayal, short of the biblical level, for someone who pretends to be a Hendrix source. This is notorious and deserves to be exposed. May Caesar Glebbeek be shown as the scoundrel he is and betrayer of the subject of his ambitions.


Caesar has been a valid documentor of Hendrix history throughout his Hendrix career. Because of this he is in possession of diary-like facts and information surrounding Jimi Hendrix. He begins 'Until We Meet Again' with a chronology starting at September 1st 1970. The reason he does that is because he's trying to qualify his murder theory arguments with his knowledge of day to day Hendrix history. By doing this he thinks his murder theory arguments will gain credibility. However there's something much more sinister going on in Caesar's opening pages. What he's really trying to do is document the breakdown of Jimi and his professional performance during those last few weeks. What Caesar is trying to do is paint a picture, like a prosecutor, of Jimi's breakdown and reckless drug use during his final days. And he's doing it in defense of Monika Dannemann and her notorious lies. Caesar accesses his archives of media interviews and personal accounts to fill in this depreciating chronology of sinister intent.

On page 6 Caesar finally gets around to some significant evidence. He tells of Billy Cox, Hendrix's bass player, being unknowingly dosed with LSD after the Gothenburg concert. Now it was known that Jimi was dosed with bad acid at the Madison Square Garden anti-Viet Nam War concert, and that Jimi's notorious manager Michael Jeffery was known to use dirty tactics to break-up Hendrix's attempts to form new bands, however, knowing this, and seeing how it directly relates to what happened to Cox, Caesar ignores all these incriminating factors and simply remarks that this wasn't the first time Cox had experienced hallucinogens as was commonly believed. And this is supposed to be a person having the last word on the murder theories. Knowing what we know about Jeffery, no person suggesting an end-all investigation would ever ignore this circumstance - yet there you have Caesar doing it and pretending he still has one speck's worth of credibility. For all we know that bad acid was intended for Jimi. Or maybe it was just Jeffery doing his usual dirty tactics again to get Noel Redding back in the band where he could return to his money-making arrangement in the Jimi Hendrix Experience. Caesar pretends not to notice that this dirty business of bad acid mickey's perfectly conforms to the pattern of foul play that led directly to Jimi's murder. He pretends it doesn't exist.


On page 7 Caesar offers an interview Jimi gave in Denmark as an example of his increasingly spacey condition that signifies a loss of personal control. Jimi's talking about not living to 28, and not being able to offer anything musically, and therefore not needing to be on the planet, as well as needing a wife, are all posed in a way to make it look like Jimi was losing control and understandably ended-up dead at the Samarkand Hotel weeks later. Nowhere does Caesar bother to give honest context that Jimi was showing extreme stress and talking in ultimate terms because he was worried about his dangerous manager and what he might do to him. Caesar never bothers to even mention it, even though there's serious evidence behind it. And this is from an author who dares pose himself as offering the final comprehensive "investigation". Never does Caesar give any intelligent thought to the possibility that Jimi's blown concert the next night at Arhus may have been due to his also receiving the same bad dose as Billy Cox. Or maybe cracking under the stress of the knowledge of its intention.


On page 13 Caesar has the incredible ignorance to highlight a special comment box quoting Kirsten Nefer as saying Jimi stalled for over a half-hour before coming on stage in Copenhagen because he thought he might be shot. Nefer also quotes Jimi as asking people whether they thought he would live to be 28? Caesar, in his profound arrogance to prove Monika right, takes pure evidence that Jimi had foreknowledge of threats against his life and twists them against Jimi himself as evidence of Jimi's mental instability, and, therefore, proof of the cause of his ultimate demise at the Samarkand. Nowhere does Caesar even briefly stop to consider that these outward signs of Jimi expressing knowledge of a direct threat to his life are pure evidence of the real reason for his death weeks later.


.

[Albert Doyle]

On pages 14 and 15 Caesar illustrates how the whole general scene around Jimi was becoming stormy like a maelstrom. Even the weather at the Isle of Fehmarn was acting in accordance. Billy, being in a paranoid state from being dosed, was picking-up this overhanging vibe more than the others and translating it into a direct sense of doom. Never once, however, does Caesar ever bother to consider that this sense of dread and apathy in both Billy and Jimi was at least partly attributable to Jimi's dilemma with Jeffery, if not directly. On page 15 Jimi is quoted as saying it was no fun anymore and he no longer wanted to play. Now those who know Jimi Hendrix would realize it would take a lot for Jimi to say such a thing, since playing guitar was all Jimi lived for. Never once does Caesar ever bother to consider that Jeffery's pressure on Jimi might have been the force behind this extreme comment.


On page 16 Jimi once again repeats to Karen Davis his intention to quit playing guitar. Again, anyone who knows Hendrix knows this wouldn't have lasted too long, so what was driving Jimi towards these radical moves? Could it have been the death of Alan Wilson combined with news of the death of one of Steingarten's clients in Vanilla Fudge, along with Billy's being personally sabotaged? This never seems to dawn on Caesar who doesn't even give it any consideration - even though it perfectly explains Jimi's actions.


On page 17 Caesar quotes Kirsten Nefer as saying Billy flew home on the 9th of September. There's question over the accuracy of this because David Henderson writes that Jimi was falsely telling people he sent Billy home in order to prevent him from being committed. Caesar should know that, but he deliberately doesn't share this detail with his readers because he's trying to cover-up information that works against Monika. Caesar is simply a dishonest person who has such contempt for his readers that he charges US$45 for the privilege of being lied to. What Caesar doesn't share with his readers is the fact Kirsten was given the cover-story about sending Billy home and repeated it without realizing it was a ruse. The reason Caesar does this is because Billy was being tended by Jeffery office members who were in contact with both Jimi and Monika. This destroys Monika's story so Caesar aids and abets her perjury by promoting this false claim.

Also on page 17 is evidence that once Jimi was pulled-out from under the dark cloud of Jeffery's persecution he snapped right back to happy, frolicking and jumping in the street. Kirsten and Karen had taken him to an Italian movie where his attention was diverted from Jeffery's terror. So Caesar's attempt to portray Jimi in the grips of fatal depression is undone right there. Clearly Jimi snapped-back when he was removed from thoughts of Jeffery.


Next, Alan Douglas tells of a meeting with Jimi on the night of Monday the 14th at Danny Secunda's house. This is important because Douglas relates in no uncertain terms that Jimi instructed him to prepare for the firing of Michael Jeffery. There's question over which night this occurred. Tony Brown has it happening on Monday night, but David Henderson has it happening on Wednesday night, with Douglas being taken to Heathrow by Jimi in a cab on Thursday morning. Secunda, the host, was quoted as saying it happened on Wednesday night. This is important because other sources tell me Alan Douglas was at the Kameron party on Thursday night and was using this story as an alibi to remove himself from his being there and what it entailed. The reason this pattern of alibis is important to note is because the timing of Jimi firing Jeffery, and Jeffery reacting by murdering Jimi, is important to get right. The closer Alan Douglas' mission to fire Jeffery occurs to Jimi's death the more likely it was directly related. Again, Caesar acts like a blind man in reaction to this and pretends it doesn't exist. It's in Caesar's interest to push these Monika-defending versions, however they do very little for either Jimi or the truth.

Caesar claims Jimi "moved-in" with Monika at the Samarkand Hotel on the 15th. The degree to which Jimi actually did that is debatable depending on how much you want to honor different people's versions and their agendas. There's no doubt Jimi kept his official address at the Cumberland Hotel along with his belongings. Jimi was known to have shown up at Ronnie Scott's that evening to try to stand-in with Eric Burdon and War, however he was said to have been too incapacitated by some undetermined cause to play and was rejected. Both Monika and Caesar avoid this information in their accounts of that incident.


Page 19: Caesar fails to account how Monika arranged the Samarkand Hotel. Monika was from Germany and unfamiliar with London. Seeing how the Samarkand was only 2 blocks from Jeffery employee and Hendrix stage manager Gerry Stickells' flat, it would make sense that she went to Jeffery's office to arrange some accommodations and that Stickells could have possibly recommended the nearby Samarkand Hotel. Stickells tried to distance himself from knowledge of the Samarkand at the Inquest. However we'll show later why that isn't very believable. Sources say Monika paid for the Samarkand herself. If we look at Jimi's habits he never would have allowed any woman he seriously considered to be his fiancee to pay for her own hotel. Monika wrote in her book The Inner World Of Jimi Hendrix that she found the Samarkand in a newspaper advertisement section. Caesar's oversimplifying of the Samarkand and its history allows him to avoid addressing its real history and who knew what about it. There's so many lies and conflicts in this work that there's almost too many to mention, however Monika's claim that Jimi called Mitch Mitchell from the Cumberland to give him her phone number at the Samarkand is refuted by Mitch himself who commented the only number he had was the one for the Cumberland. Caesar, of course, never mentions this quote.

Caesar commits yet another gross historical inaccuracy by quoting Chas as saying Jimi called him on Wednesday night to discuss Chas' producing Jimi's records again. Caesar should know that Chas' original claim was that Jimi showed-up at his door unannounced and spent the evening at Chas' flat discussing this move. This is more likely to be true because Jimi couldn't get Chas' phone number so he went right to the flat he used to share with Chas because he knew its location. Seeing how desperate Jimi was to make these moves against Jeffery this version makes more sense - not to mention it was Chas' own original account. Not only that but Chas was on record as saying this meeting was something that actually happened back in March. Chas was obviously making an excuse to deny the meeting because he was obviously aware it had something to do with Jimi's death. It's not very believable that someone would confuse such an important meeting only two days before Jimi died. Caesar gets around all this by simply impugning Chandler as a known story teller and "embellisher". Caesar isn't honest.

While Caesar focuses on misleading his readers with trivialities, he misses something very important. He displays a photograph, taken at the Samarkand, of Alvenia Bridges posing in front of Monika's blue Opal sports car. Well this is interesting, because nowhere in the official timeline is there any known place for Alvenia to have associated with Monika that way. Caesar has the absolutely blind credulous stupidity to not realize he has presented seriously incriminating evidence in photographic form that works directly against his case. From Alvenia's expression she appears to be very flustered and happy. Is this an expression caused by her reaction to Jimi Hendrix taking her photo? If so, there's no accounting for this meeting in any of Monika's official claims, and this photograph serves as direct proof of her lies. Yet Caesar has the incredible fatuousness to not even realize it. And this is from a person who has the abject nerve to present himself as having the last word and final investigation on the matter.


.

[Albert Doyle]

Page 20:

Caesar starts off with publicist Kenny Schaffer saying Jimi couldn't hold a grudge against Mike Jeffery and couldn't fight back. First, what Schaffer is doing here is accenting the fact Jeffery was violating Jimi. Jimi actually was fighting back and was holding back from performing for Jeffery by breaking-up the Experience against Jeffery's wishes, and by retreating to the Catskills and forming new bands. In the next quote he has Secunda telling the truth that Jimi was very worried about Michael Jeffery, however Caesar uses this opportunity to insert his own context box into Secunda's words indicating Douglas had left London Tuesday. Secunda never said that. Caesar knowingly inserts this context box because he knows Secunda knows the real time Douglas left London. Caesar is a criminal liar deceiving his readers.

Tony Brown interviewed Judy Wong about the birthday party for her at Elvaston Place on Wednesday the 16th. Wong said Jimi and Monika left early in the afternoon. Monika claimed in Inner World that she and Jimi left Judy Wong's and went right to Ronnie Scott's. Why Monika lied about this should be investigated because it probably covers-up some kind of event or knowledge she doesn't want people to know. Did Jimi and Monika go back to the Samarkand after Judy Wong's party and meet people she didn't want to tell about? As usual, Caesar accepts Monika's story unquestioningly and doesn't bother to recognize any other conflicting stories.

As a side note it is claimed Devon showed-up in London because she saw news articles about Jimi's claimed engagement to Kirsten Nefer. However, it should be noted that Devon was an employee of Michael Jeffery paid to keep track of Jimi. Was Devon's trip to London, where Jimi did not want her, sponsored and instigated by Jeffery in response to Jimi's attempts to leave him?


Page 21: September 17th

In his account of Monika and Jimi rushing to the bank before 3 to get cash, Caesar forgets to detail that Monika went to her bank and Jimi went to his. A minor point perhaps, but this sort of displays the relationship Monika had with Jimi. Jimi was foolhardy with money and how he gave it away to friends, so the fact Monika was supplying her own funds sort of bespeaks the nature of their relationship. Important in this account is the confirmation that Monika bought two bottles of wine on this trip.

Next Caesar tells of Kathy Etchingham's detailed account of Jimi meeting her at the Kensington market. Kathy details Jimi's typical behavior of sneaking-up behind her. A description that lends it credibility because this is how Jimi was known to act. However, with all this in mind, Caesar then lists a second account of this incident by quoting a single line from Monika Dannemann, a known pathological liar, denying this meeting ever took place. Caesar then inserts a context remark saying that Monika's version is almost certainly the correct one.


Page 22:

Monika continues her account of Thursday afternoon. Here she tells of a critically important phone call she witnessed Jimi make to his New York lawyer Henry Steingarten where he instructed Steingarten to fire Michael Jeffery once and for all. Jimi then confirmed his intentions by following-up with a call to his New York studio engineer Eddie Kramer asking him to bring all his studio tapes over to England. There's no doubt from the multiple statements from multiple witnesses on page 22 that Jimi was intending to fire Jeffery and was in the process of doing so.

Also on this page is the description of the infamous mysterious party Jimi went to with Monika after accidentally bumping in to its host in another car in a crowded traffic circle. The host was the son of a British member of Parliament Philip Harvey. Mr Harvey and his two teenage girl friends asked Jimi over for tea while stuck next to Monika's car in the traffic circle. Jimi agreed and they all eventually ended-up back at Harvey's townhouse for a small party. This story didn't come out until 1995 when Harvey's MP father died and he thought it was no longer a scandal to him.


Page 23:

Here's where Caesar really goes over the top and beyond the pale. Caesar again bifurcates this event by offering Philip Harvey's version, then Monika's. Harvey's true account tells of Jimi, Monika, Anne Day, Penny Ravenhill, and himself all smoking grass and drinking wine. After a few hours Monika stormed-out of the room because Jimi was paying too much attention to the pretty young ladies. Harvey thought the wine Monika was drinking may have contributed. Harvey's account is important because it tells of Monika having a screaming hysterical fit over this incident outside on the street. It also relates that Jimi and Monika left at 10:40pm after Monika could not be calmed-down. Monika's version is that they left Harvey's about 7:30 and returned to the Samarkand. Of course Caesar calls everyone else a liar and tries to validate Monika's version. Never once does he consider that Monika created this false version in order to cover-up her screaming fit with Jimi or how it conflicted with the fairy tale romance she was trying to depict. Caesar then commits a brutal twist of reality by claiming Monika's claim that Mitch never spoke to Jimi at the Samarkand was 'incorrect'. Forget the fact Caesar forgets to mention Mitch's own admission that he never spoke to Jimi at the Samarkand. The truth stands squarely on its head in Caesar's three ring circus - with Caesar as the ringmaster. Caesar outright lies by suggesting Gerry Stickells spoke to Jimi at the Samarkand after they returned from Harvey's. He a flagrant misquoter and rather sloppy context-distorter. Caesar seems to think he's getting away with not explaining how Mitch could talk to Jimi at 7pm when even his own accounts make that impossible according to his own timeline. As usual Caesar deals with these insurmountable conflicts by ignoring them and hoping he'll get away with it at his own word.

And here's where we get to the ultimate outrage concerning this event. Caesar claims he found a resident of Harvey's lane named 'Eliza'. She claims that Monika blocked her driveway when she parked for Harvey's party. Eliza allegedly claimed that she knocked on Harvey's door to unblock her driveway and that Jimi and Monika came out and drove away at 7:30. Caesar then claims this proves Monika's 8pm return time to the Samarkand and disproves Harvey's account. There's one problem with this, Penny Ravenhill, one of the girls at the party, was quoted as saying she strictly remembers it was dark - and dark for a while - when Jimi and Monika left. At 7:30 on the night of September 17th it is still light in London. Not only that but Ravenhill also remembered the screaming fit which could only have occurred from 10pm to 10:40. Caesar pretends Penny doesn't exist and in doing so destroys his own credibility. What a fool!


Page 24:

Caesar attempts to show that Jimi's dislike of red wine proves the claimed 3 bottles of wine consumed at Harvey's wasn't true. This is silly because 1) Harvey never said Jimi drank that much. He actually said Monika took more interest in the wine than the cannabis, and 2) Caesar, once again, arrogantly fails to realize 3 bottles of wine actually connotes the likelihood of the claimed 5 hour time period for the party rather than refutes it. Once again, Caesar takes evidence showing the opposite and ridiculously tries to interpret it in his favor.

To further this offense Caesar then quotes Monika's infamous lies about that night to reinforce his depiction. Anybody who quotes Monika directly in this event has pretty much destroyed their own credibility by that alone. Most researchers of this event agree Monika lied about the time periods involved with Harvey's party because she didn't want to admit she and Jimi had a row. And there you have Caesar Glebbeek trying to honor Monika's known lies despite all this.


Page 25:


Caesar's mad adventure into prevarication continues by quoting Monika's claimed time of Jimi's arrival at Kameron's party as being about 1:30am. Many dispute this and think Monika dropped Jimi right off at Kameron's after their fight at Harvey's. In order to justify Monika's lies Caesar is forced to split the accounts of that night into many different versions. He quotes Stella Douglas as saying they had ordered Thai take-out just as Monika returned and started buzzing on the intercom. Well, Tony Brown says there were no oriental take-outs open at 1am in London in 1970. Since Monika returned at least a half-hour after dropping Jimi off that means the times involved had to suggest Monika dropped Jimi at Kameron's shortly after leaving Harvey's. Caesar never bothers to inform people of Brown's discovery. Nor does Caesar ever stop to consider that Jimi's putting Monika (his alleged fiancee) off at Kameron's was exactly because of the tantrum she threw at Harvey's. Caesar is in denial of all this so he's forced to ignore it in public. Another possibility is that Jimi did return to the Samarkand for a short period where he encountered Terry Slater. Slater later slipped and admitted to Earth magazine in December 1970 that he had seen Jimi at the flat on the evening of the 17th and that he was in a bad mood (most likely from Monika's fit). Was Slater sent there by Jeffery to check-up on Jimi's attempt to fire him? Slater never talked about this admission from then on. Again, Monika shows a need to cover-up nasty events between her and Jimi so she denies the confrontation at Kameron's where she was attacked by members of the party. Monika displays a psychopathic tendency here because she is trying to deny an event that was witnessed by dozens. Caesar joins her.

In earlier accounts Monika claimed she made a fish sandwich for Jimi once they arrived back at the Samarkand. Her context was clearly that Jimi ate the sandwich. It was only after Kathy Etchingham came forward to say Jimi hated tunafish and never ate it that Monika was quoted as saying she never actually said Jimi ate it. Here Monika shows a pattern of lies designed to get around her indefensible accounts. Terry Slater was quoted as saying there were no food-making facilities at the flat.

Also on this page Monika claims she took 1 Vesparax sleeping tablet and went to bed at 6am. Vesparax were very strong and 1 tablet (twice the recommended dose of a half tablet) would cause serious sleep in the taker. Jimi was found fully-clothed and dead on top of an unslept-in bed. Monika's claim of being in bed with Jimi doesn't jibe with this evidence. Monika gives another example of key evidence here by saying Jimi wore his crucifix to bed like she had never seen him do before. Nowhere does it ever strike Caesar that this was a sign of Jimi's fear of what Jeffery had threatened to do to him if he ever fired him. I think we all know what psychopathic Monika is indirectly hinting at here. Caesar continues by quoting Monika's long-disproven account of that morning. Again, Caesar courts the bizarre by not realizing his own quoting of several conflicting versions of the cigarette trip, as told by Monika, only accents the fact she's lying. Caesar never bothers to figure out why.


.

[Albert Doyle]

Page 26:


By now Caesar is in a full-fledged run with the devil. He utilizes a sleazy tactic of confirming that there was a cigarette shop Monika could have gone to on her claimed cigarette trip. Using this he then tries to parlay it into a confirmation of Monika's 10:20am wake-up time story originally told to the Inquest. This takes real nerve because we have numerous conflicting accounts coming from many of the main witnesses, including Eric Burdon, who admitted Monika called him around dawn (5:45am). We also have Gerry Stickells admitting Terry Slater called him between 8 and 9am. Even after Judy Wong was gotten to and changed her story, she still said Monika called her around 9am. (Monika said she called Wong before Burdon, so that call had to be near 5:40am. Wong lied about the time of this call in order to cover what really happened). Caesar ignores all these conflicts and just focuses on Monika's story, hoping his confirmation of the cigarette shop will carry it.

From there Caesar dutifully reports the calculated lies of Alvenia Bridges and any others who were involved in the cover-up. If you watch 'The Man They Made God' you'll see Eric Burdon admit that Monika called at dawn and Alvenia went right over, yet in 'Until We Meet Again' Caesar presents Alvenia telling us Monika cleaned the flat on her own before the ambulance came. Like both Caesar and Monika, Alvenia manages to erase 5 hours of time by doing this.

At this point Caesar commits another gross criminal act. He lies and says the constable arrived before the ambulance because the ambulance service automatically summons the police upon being called. Caesar gives no reference to this because it's an outright lie. The truth is the ambulance attendants summoned the constable because the flat was empty when they arrived and British law requires them to summon the police when there is no one there to identify the victim. Caesar knows this and is deliberately lying to get around it. I think he's damned himself with this. Caesar knows the original account told by the ambulance attendants who gave the description above. He literally has to lie, just like the object of his efforts Monika, to get around the traps. One constable, Ian Smith, confirmed Monika wasn't there. To get around this Caesar quotes Smith disowning this statement after Scotland Yard approached him. However the original statement was clear and identically matched other original statements confirming it.

To further his own damnation Caesar then prints Monika's pure fabrications about meeting the ambulance attendants as they arrived, hearing from them Jimi would be all right, and then riding with them in the ambulance. All of these are confirmed lies proven by statements taken from all those involved, as well as private remarks from others involved at the time, yet there you have Caesar presenting them as verified and true. What is really creepy is the realization Monika may be repeating the words of the murderers when speaking about how the ambulance men told her Jimi would be all right. Or speaking about witnessing them tipping Jimi's head back and keeping him from breathing.


Page 27:


I believe Caesar could be burning his soul here in public when he goes and fetches new quotes from the ambulance attendants claiming there might have been someone there when they arrived. Now all of a sudden Jimi was alive and had not made the evacuation mess in the ambulance. Also, Reginald Jones allegedly throws in the extra bonus of saying he now vaguely recalls seeing a woman at admissions at the hospital. In one fell swoop Jones has now reversed all the incriminating evidence against Monika and reversed everything he was recorded saying in the original interviews. Caesar is running naked and wild here because he gives absolutely no background context or comment as to the source of these statements. For all we know they could be coming from Dee Mitchell and could be completely invented.

In any case the true context of these statements is that Scotland Yard started going out and interviewing all the main witnesses after Kathy Etchingham got their original statements. Scotland Yard, like FBI, can have a curious effect on witnesses once they come into contact with them. In any case we have no idea what those witnesses were shown to make them disown their comments. Anyone who reads the confident wording used in the original statements would see right away that they couldn't possibly be reversed without serious explanation. In Caesar's indefinite smoke and mirrors job he carefully crafts all input around this and never demands any explanation for the alleged changes in stories he produces. He just hears what he wants to hear any way he can get it and goes with it. In no way whatsoever is this any kind of credible 'investigation'. Caesar is an evil surfer who rides the crest of the wave of deception he creates. If these changed accounts are directly from the attendants then they've been gotten to. There's no way they can get away with these radical changes in story without being made to account for it.

A good example of the credulous nature of this work is ambulance attendant Jones who says "if Monika didn't ride with us in the ambulance how could she have known which hospital we went to?" Well, how about Monika rode in her car to the hospital while following the ambulance? This so called investigation is pathetic and doesn't bother to ask all the other witnesses who spoke about watching the ambulance arrive while standing across the street with Monika (quote: Slater).

Caesar says that if Jimi was dead they would have sealed the flat off and declared it a crime scene. However Caesar purposefully ignores the fact that the original accounts from the witnesses admitted Jimi was black and was therefore carted-off to hospital to save the police paper work. Terry Slater admitted to Kathy Etchingham that Jimi was dead while they cleaned the flat.

Caesar once again has to do damage control for Alvenia's lies. He says her statement to author Jerry Hopkins, that she arrived just as the ambulance pulled-up, was false. He also adds her statement that Monika checked Jimi into the hospital under false name was also false. Well, yes, Caesar is correct here, those statements were false, but only because they were being used to protect Monika's lies. Caesar, once again, has the abject nerve to bend statements in his favor because of his need to cover for Monika's lies. Never once does he detect that he has to do so much correction because the stories were all based on lies. What Caesar does is go out and prune everybody else's statements in order to make them fit Monika's. He's crazy because he's doing this in broad daylight and thinking he's getting away with it right in the face of what is already known. He thinks we don't see him doing it.

Caesar now turns to Doctor Seifert to get him to completely change his story. If you read Dr Seifert's original statements in Tony Brown, and also on BBC's 'The Man They Made God', he's pretty unequivocal that Jimi was dead when they received him and that the monitor was flat. Dr Seifert repeated many times that he worked on Jimi for only a few minutes and then quit because Jimi was obviously dead and he had other patients. This would cover the established times of 11:46am to about 11:49. Caesar now has Dr Seifert quoted as saying there "may have been some breathing involved". This statement is so vague and so obviously reluctant to claim Jimi was actually breathing, that it should be obvious for what it is. Furthermore Dr Seifert now claims he worked on Jimi for ten minutes and then declared him dead. If we go to the known timeline this would now entail Dr Seifert working on Jimi from 12:05 to 12:15 when Jimi was declared dead. Not only does this reverse the previous juncture at which Dr Seifert treated Jimi, but it also puts Dr Seifert right next to Doctor Bannister when he was allegedly suctioning bottles of wine from Hendrix's lungs. Dr Seifert never mentions Dr Bannister or what he was doing in this new account. Also Dr Seifert was previously quoted as saying Dr Bannister continued to treat Jimi after he quit (at 11:49) and that's why he didn't witness what Dr Bannister witnessed. Caesar offers no explanation for this bizarre change of accounts, instead he offers a shameless attack on Dr Bannister and his professional reputation (as if that would compensate for his not being able to explain these radical changes). As far as Caesar quoting Dr Seifert as not detecting any alcohol on Jimi, he should reference his own source, Monika, who admitted to Sharon Lawrence that she washed 'sick' off Jimi's face with wine.


Page 28:


Caesar continues to smear Dr Bannister by indirectly suggesting that the doctor who Monika claims treated Jimi lectured her on interracial couples. Caesar then quotes minor errors by Dr Bannister in accounts of that morning to try to paint him as unreliable and calls his input "inconsistent". This takes real nerve considering he is defending one of the most notorious liars and offerers of completely inconsistent information in Monika. Monika is 'consistent' all right, but only in the sense that she stuck to her lies no matter what.

Caesar then relates Dr Bannister's accurate account of receiving Jimi dead and witnessing unusual amounts of red wine exuding from his mouth and nose. He seizes on Dr Bannister's use of the word "unconscious" to prove Jimi wasn't dead, but little does Caesar realize that unconsciousness also overlaps with the description of dead. Meanwhile the rest of Dr Bannister's statement makes it more than clear Jimi was dead with cyanosed cheek tissue when Dr Bannister received him. Important in this quote from Dr Bannister is his description of suctioning wine from Hendrix.

Ultimately Caesar gives very little direct refutation of Dr Bannister's more than clear evidence for both death and drowning in red wine on page 28. I get the sense that he does this because there's very little he can refute. Instead Caesar deals with this by offering a special highlighted box which describes Dr Bannister's being struck-off the medical register for billing fraud. Intel often attacks witnesses to its crimes by such defamation and character destruction means. I would bet if US doctors were held to the same standard as Dr Bannister more than half would be de-licensed. Was Dr Bannister struck-off because he was a bad doctor or was he struck-off because he witnessed something very dangerous?


Page 29:


Caesar quotes Dr Seifert as saying he and Dr Bannister were called to the Department as soon as Jimi arrived. Well, Jimi arrived at 11:46am. However just a few pages back Caesar quotes Dr Seifert as saying he worked on Hendrix until he declared him dead. Jimi was declared dead at 12:15, as the record shows. Dr Seifert is also quoted as saying he only worked on Jimi for ten minutes. 12:15 minus ten minutes only gets Dr Seifert back to 12:05. It doesn't get him anywhere close to the 11:46 he now claims right next to his other statement, and Caesar doesn't ask him to account.

Jimi was witnessed by the ambulance attendants as being fully-dressed. It's part of the evidence that he was murdered. Here on page 29 Dr Seifert is also quoted as saying Jimi was fully-clothed when he received him. This doesn't work well for Caesar so he inserts a [sic] next to this and corrects Dr Seifert on Jimi's clothing status saying he was actually naked. Caesar gives no source for this claim, he simply pronounces it. The reason he does this is because he knows Jimi's being fully-dressed endangers Monika's claim of being in bed with Jimi.

Finally Caesar fails to notice he quotes Dr Seifert once again coming around to his original statement that he worked on Jimi for only a short time and didn't know what Dr Bannister did. Well, if Dr Seifert's new claim is true then how could he -not- know what Dr Bannister did since he would have been standing right next to him? No, Dr Seifert exposes himself here. This story doesn't match the new one Caesar has come up with.

Caesar once again stupidly tries to exploit semantics by saying Dr Bannister claimed Jimi was both unconscious and dead. Well, for the instant that the receiving doctor doesn't have the equipment to determine the life state of the victim they are medically referred to as "unconscious". This can be reversed when the doctor detects medical evidence that the patient was long dead as Bannister did. Caesar's methodology is fatuous. Its dishonest nature of trying to smear Dr Bannister wherever possible, and twist every conceivable fact against him, is kind of obvious. Caesar is desperately reaching and it isn't working in a bad way.

Next Caesar tries to claim that rigor mortis and lividity are inescapable medical factors that preclude Jimi being long dead as Dr Bannister claimed. This is silly, however, because common medical knowledge tells us rigor can be delayed significantly in various cases. Keep in mind that Jimi was pickled in wine and suffused with muscle-relaxing barbiturate. Perhaps the damp basement flat also had some affect. This alleged irrefutable 'proof' Caesar brings is nothing of the sort. Meanwhile he goes on to tell us the nurses are trained to detect such symptoms when the patient arrives and if Jimi was dead they would have known it. However he forgets that Dr Seifert and Dr Bannister were the ones who received Jimi. This is all silly, however, because the ambulance attendants were clear that Jimi was dead when they encountered him, and Terry Slater admitted Jimi was dead when they cleaned the flat. Caesar's weak equivocations and excuse-making won't get around that reality.

And here is where Caesar makes one of his worst bungling mistakes. He thinks he has the final thrust to end the issue when he references the death certificate that shows Dr Seifert filling-in a box that asks if a medical doctor treated the victim either before or after death. Dr Seifert fills it in by indicating he treated Jimi both "before and after" death. Caesar gets boastful in his perceived victory here and imagined final proof, however he's too stupid to realize that until the patient is legally declared dead he is technically still legally 'alive'. When Dr Seifert indicated on the form that he treated Hendrix both before and after death he was referring to legal death not clinical. This is simply a technicality that is more proof of Caesar's desperation and incompetence than anything else. He should never be allowed to present any kind of opinion about Jimi Hendrix's death to the public.

Caesar's worst blunder is his claim that the red wine didn't exist because it wasn't detected at the autopsy. In another example of Caesar's pure stupidity, he failed to realize the wine could not possibly be found at the autopsy because it had been suctioned-out and disposed of down the drain by Dr Bannister at the hospital 3 days earlier. Instead of seeing what this indicates Caesar once again pulls an outrageous reversal and claims that the negligible blood alcohol content proves there was no wine in the lungs. He states that if the wine existed it would have necessitated a high blood alcohol content. Caesar once again wags the dog with its tail by failing to recognize the obvious, that is, that the low blood alcohol level is serious forensic evidence that the wine was not in Jimi for a long period before he died. And that is the exact forensic pattern of being drowned in wine as is being claimed. But seeing how Caesar insists reality bend to his demands he simply operates by the method that everything he thinks is true and everything else is therefore naturally wrong. Caesar is one of the most outrageous egotistical, lying, arrogant jackasses I've ever seen dare go public. Especially on this kind of serious matter.

Caesar once again quotes Stella Douglas as saying Jimi didn't like red wine. Nowhere does Caesar ever allow that the red wine didn't end-up in Jimi voluntarily. Caesar self-excuses himself from admitting this by simply seeing himself as out to disprove it, however disproving something is no way to conduct any kind of valid 'investigation'. True investigations must look at all evidence objectively.

Finally, the reason Dr Bannister was the main witness to the wine was because he uncorked the hard, dry plug of vomit that the ambulance attendants identified in Jimi's windpipe. Since Dr Seifert's true account had him quit before Dr Bannister removed this plug, this explains why Dr Bannister was the only one to witness the wine. By the time Dr Bannister suctioned it out Dr Seifert had already walked away.

Caesar tries to say the red wine was actually Coca Cola that Monika served Jimi, but we know that there was "bottles worth" witnessed in Jimi's lungs and stomach. Therefore if this was Coke Jimi would have had a remarkable level of caffeine discovered in him at the autopsy. There was none detected. It was wine because we know there were unaccounted-for wine bottles at the Samarkand, and we know Dr Bannister witnessed significant amounts of wine saturating Jimi's hair and the scarf wrapped around his neck - not to mention the smell.

Next, Caesar knows Dr Crompton witnessed serious evidence of Jimi dying earlier than Monika claimed. So he opens his section on Dr Crompton by once again defaming him as an opening move. Caesar lets loose with his own specious delivery of pure conjecture and contrived 'facts' in order to discredit Dr Crompton. He heavily criticizes Dr Crompton on the issue of the wine saying Dr Crompton never even saw the patient and was depending on hearsay. He claims Jimi last drank wine at around midnight so how could anyone smell or witness wine on him 11 hours later at the hospital? However, once again, Caesar fails to consider that Monika admitted washing vomit off Jimi with wine (Monika was really making an excuse for her knowledge that Jimi had been drowned in wine).


.

[Albert Doyle]

Page 30:


Caesar fishes quotes on Dr Bannister saying he now backed-off to a position of saying it wasn't possible to determine an exact time of death. 1) This doesn't preclude Dr Crompton's previous statement that Jimi died no later than 5:30am. 2) This is typical of all the witnesses who suddenly became less sure after they had been visited by Scotland Yard. 3) Caesar doesn't realize that Dr Crompton doesn't respond to his inquiry exactly because he's been intimidated and doesn't want to risk speaking what he really feels. Dr Crompton correctly determined that the whole grains of rice Dr Teare witnessed in Jimi's stomach showed, forensically, that Jimi could not have died any later than 5:30am. Dr Crompton was attacked after saying this and accused by Scotland Yard of using "antiquated methods", however nowhere did Scotland Yard ever describe why those methods were antiquated or unsound. Observing undigested grains of rice is both a simple and reliable forensic determiner. Dr Crompton was correct and nothing Scotland Yard or Caesar does changes that. That's why Dr Crompton won't speak, and it's also why he backed-off into that vague position.

If you Google Dr Crompton you'll find he developed a reputation as a talented 'cold case' solver in England. He was called to solve difficult cases that were on the books for years that the normal authorities couldn't figure-out. Because of this he was involved in a recent case where a Serbian man named Petar Sutovic was murdered. Dr Crompton came-up with a determination that Sutovic died from morphine poisoning. However family members said Petar's body showed signs of blunt trauma injury and that he was murdered by an eastern european gang for his body parts to be sold on the black market. Caesar uses this to condemn Dr Crompton as a paid political autopsist. But Caesar never stops to consider that Dr Crompton made this decision 1) in the years after Scotland Yard had corrupted him on the Hendrix case. 2) That this is actually evidence that shows Dr Crompton will veer away from a determination on political grounds (just as he is doing in the Hendrix case). Dr Crompton isn't off with his statement that Jimi died at 5:30am, he's off with his retraction that the exact time couldn't be determined. Once again, Caesar interprets things exactly backwards.

Caesar now plays very dumb by questioning how the attendants got into the flat if Monika wasn't there. First Caesar is showing us what he knows he has a problem with by addressing this issue. He knows this is condemning so he has to get around it. The simple answer is Monika left the door wide-open as the ambulance men testified. Caesar knows this but he tries to confuse us by suggesting the police officer who got there first opened the door. This is an outright lie and shows the desperate non-truth Caesar is willing to resort to to deceive us. Caesar is committing a crime here because any simple investigation will show the ambulance men got there first and then called the police exactly because no one was there. Both Monika and Caesar knowingly depend on Scotland Yard's muddying of the evidence to obstruct this issue. Caesar caps this act of pure deception by quoting Dee Mitchell, a woman who was literally chased from England by the police over her unexplainable wickedly false accusations made to the police about Kathy Etchingham and her family members. This is a pure example of intel defamation and character assassination tactics against a target who is exposing them. Caesar uses this source without explaining to the readers Dee Mitchell's true background and practices. Anyone of any intelligence could see Caesar's quotes were either fabricated by Dee or forced by Scotland Yard.

Caesar tries to capitalize on a quote by Dr Bannister saying Jimi was very tall like a basketball player whose feet were hanging 10 inches over the end of the gurney. He uses this to question Dr Bannister's veracity since Jimi was of moderate height. Anyone who has studied this would know that Dr Bannister did not say that until recent years and that his original 1992 statements never mentioned anything like that. Those statements still stand and Caesar's cheap "Tall Man" canard does nothing to overturn them or what they show. Dr Bannister remembers the right man because there was a huge Inquest and controversy shortly after.

Caesar spends the rest of the page giving quotes to show Monika was actually at the hospital even though some people wonder if she was. This is neither here nor there because it doesn't really have anything to do with the main murder evidence. Caesar conflates it deliberately because he specializes in overblowing minor side issues in order to avoid the main issues. The reason Hendrix authors doubted Monika's hospital stories is because she lied about everything else. How much of her hospital stories is true and how much isn't is hard to determine, however it doesn't really matter because it's outside the main murder evidence. Monika didn't ride in the ambulance. She most likely followed in her car, which is what caused the doubt. It's shameful to see Alvenia Bridges backing these lies.


Page 31:


You can tell the dastardly dishonesty of Caesar Glebbeek when he quotes Gerry Stickells as saying Terry Slater called him and told him there was trouble with Jimi. This story is well-known, but what you'll never see from Caesar's version is that Stickells was quoted for years as saying this call happened between 8 and 9am. Caesar deliberately omits this because these true times will destroy his case. What Caesar is doing here is helping Gerry Stickells avoid admitting they cleaned the flat for hours before calling the ambulance. Even Monika admitted this event, but Caesar is helping do damage control by lying around it.

Caesar bends reality again by trying to change this flat-cleaning event to the afternoon. He does this by selecting misquotes and lies. He quotes Terry Slater as saying they found a small cube of hashish on a table and threw it into the bushes, however one has to realize that the police had already been to the flat earlier. It's unlikely they would have missed this object. What Slater is obviously referring to is a cube of hash they removed prior to the ambulance arriving during their 5 hour morning clean-up.

Caesar once again tries to overstress the emphasis on minor details by spending time describing how Monika and Alvenia threw the dirty bed covers into the garden. He then has the nerve to "correct" Eric Burdon's admission that he was at the clean-up by saying he couldn't have been there because he was at a photo-shoot at the Russell Hotel in the afternoon. This is, once again, Caesar attempting to dictate all quotes and accounts according to his version. Caesar simply pronounces that the clean-up happened in the afternoon so therefore Burdon couldn't have been there. The true reality is that Burdon was at the morning clean-up admitted to by witnesses. Caesar can't allow this so he crazily tries to recreate reality using his usual tricks. I'll leave it to those reading this to determine what kind of person Caesar is, or how he relates to Jimi Hendrix.

Caesar knows he has a problem with Terry Slater's admission in Earth magazine, in December 1970, that he was at the Samarkand earlier that evening on the 17th and that Jimi was in a bad mood. The problem with this is it exposes Monika as a liar and shows she didn't give a true account of who was there. Slater too. Caesar is wholly dishonest here because he attributes this to a misquote by the reporter, however anyone who reads the quote sees right away that Slater is, by no doubt, describing his being at the Samarkand in his own words. Caesar needs to lie and dismiss this quickly because it shows Monika lied and needed to cover-up something that showed the Samarkand was known to many more people than she admitted. If you look at Slater's behavior, he never commented about this admission in the 40 years since. Nice try Caesar.

Caesar then quotes Kathy Etchingham saying Terry Slater said Jimi was lying dead on the bed while they cleaned the flat. Caesar knows this is damning so what he does is take control of reality, once again, and dictate that the clean-up happened in the afternoon so therefore this story can't be true. This is a rather childish method and illustrates Caesar's manic denial and loose grasp on reality shown in print. When Caesar has a real problem with evidence he just lies harder to get around it.

Next, Caesar quotes Monika as saying Stickells and Barrett were only interested in office and phone messages Jimi had received. First of all, Monika made efforts to prove the Samarkand was a secret hideaway known only to Jimi and her in order for Jimi to escape the office and media. So if this was an unknown place then why would there be any messages there? Obviously, Barrett and Stickells were looking for phone messages because they were trying to remove evidence of the reason why Jimi was killed. They were protecting Jeffery. From here Caesar once again dwells on minutia in order to divert attention from his deliberate schedule manipulation. If there was a short clean-up in the afternoon it was secondary to the admitted morning clean-up that Caesar is dishonestly trying to conceal.

As for the single Vesparax tablet found under the bed we have to weigh Monika's admission that "I gave Jimi the pills" to German reporter Freiheit. Was this single tablet tossed under the bed by Monika after she told Jimi she would take one too in order to induce him to take some? In any case Monika's admission to the Bild reporter shows there was a vastly different story than she admitted to the Inquest. Caesar feels safe just quoting Monika and taking her at her word without informing the readers of this true background.


Page 32:


When Caesar criticizes Dr Teare for failing to analyze the bed clothing he is simply outlining the fact the Inquest was incompetent and made no serious effort to investigate the evidence. Of course, Caesar speaks in a way that suggests this prevented proof of Monika's innocence, but anyone who has an objective view of the matter would see it prevented the discovery of the proof of Jimi's murder.

From here Caesar continues to emphasize minor misquotes out of context in order to suggest the whole incident was full of false information and errors.

Next, Caesar quotes Jim Marron as saying Jeffery was in Majorca and canceled dinner with him upon hearing of Jimi's death. Caesar leaves this uncommented upon because he hopes it will establish Jeffery's alibi. The reason Caesar doesn't comment is because he knows this doesn't really prove where Jeffery was the night before. Even worse, it evidences that Jeffery knew of Jimi's death on the 18th. Caesar can't comment on this because it's incriminating to Jeffery.

Caesar shows many quotes about Jimi's apartment being looted by Hendrix friends and associates. He indicates this was done because Jeffery owed so many people money that they wanted to get something back before there was nothing left. All Caesar is doing here is establishing Jeffery was a crook. This is important to both Jimi's relationship to him and the cause of his death.

The last section of page 32 discusses the 'Story Of Life Poem'. This is a mystical poem written in haste by Jimi. Monika claims it was written during the evening before Jimi went to Kameron's. This poem is important because the 'until we meet again' message in the lines was taken by Eric Burdon to be a suicide note.


Page 33:


September 19th - Caesar repeats Monika's account that Eric Burdon took her to Newcastle to get her out of London. In my mind this was the witnesses getting out of town. Caesar doesn't tell the reader that Eric dosed Monika with acid on the train ride.

Monika's brother Klaus Peter was quoted as saying Monika told him Jimi wanted to sleep for a day and a half before going back to America. This would suggest Jimi deliberately took a large amount of pills. The veracity of this is anybody's guess. Monika denied it and said at the Inquest that Jimi took the pills unbeknownst to her after she fell asleep. There's question over this because some people say Jimi enthusiastically wanted to meet them the next day, Friday.

Eric Burdon went on BBC on Monday the 21st to claim Jimi committed suicide and that the poem proved it. He later said he was stoned and this was a silly thing to do. Caesar, however, offers no explorative background to this. Burdon was well familiar with his gangster manager Michael Jeffery and his methods. It is possible Burdon knew exactly what happened and went on TV to send a message to Jeffery that his secret was safe with him. Burdon may have felt that Jeffery was so dangerous that he would do the same thing he did to Jimi to himself, so he needed to protect himself. Hence he draws attention away from Jeffery by claiming on BBC that Jimi committed suicide. That takes the heat off not only Jeffery but Burdon as well. Burdon was raged against by company executives who worried their insurance policies on Jimi would be canceled by this claim.

[Albert Doyle]

Page 34: The Inquest


This page deals mostly with the verbatim transcripts of the Inquest. It consists of the nominal questions asked of the witnesses to determine if there was any outward evidence of strange behavior or drug use in the victim. It is basically the state giving itself legal coverage that it investigated the circumstances of the victim's death to the satisfaction of the law. Amusing is Gerry Stickells minimizing Jimi's somewhat famous recreational drug habits (which had nothing to do with his murder).


Page 35:


On this page Caesar covers Monika's infamous statement to the Inquest. She presents the suggestion to the Inquest that Jimi slept comfortably with her at the Samarkand on each night since Tuesday the 15th. Some doubt this and present stories of Jimi being other places on some of those nights. Monika tries to portray a comfortable and close romantic relationship with Jimi in her stories to try and reinforce the fiancee scenario. She then tells of arriving back at the Samarkand from Harvey's at 8:30. She does this because she's trying to eliminate the screaming fight she had with Jimi during the true times involved. Caesar, of course, presents this straight, uncontested, and without comment, taking Monika at her word.

Monika tells of taking 1 Vesparax herself at 7am and making Jimi two fish sandwiches. She then claims she awoke at 10:20. From there she tells the usual cigarette trip story, finding Jimi sick upon her return, and calling the ambulance. She claims that after she fell asleep Jimi must have snuck to the cupboard and taken the sleeping pills. Again, Caesar gives Monika unchallenged space as if to emphasize the veracity of this information. The reader would never know there is serious information proving that this account is a complete fabrication invented to cover the true story. Pay attention to the fact that Monika admits unnamed "visitors" to the secret flat.


Page 36:


There's serious question whether Monika took 1 of the Vesparax as she claimed. Personal anecdotes of recreational users of Vesparax said it was powerful. If Monika had taken them for her back injury then she would have known their strength. Furthermore Monika said the Vesparax came in plastic bubble packs of ten. If there was one found under the bed then where did Monika's single pill come from? Monika could claim that she took the first one and Jimi took the other nine and dropped one in the process, however she never claimed this. So if Jimi took nine tablets and dropped the tenth under the bed from a ten-pack then which pack did Monika take her tablet from? She never made any attempt to describe this nor did the police ever attempt to figure it out either. It's doubtful that Monika took any Vesparax that night because a full tablet would have induced a heavy sleep that would not allow her to awake refreshed 3 hours later as she claimed. Especially after drinking some wine that evening.

The rest of the page is a repeat of Monika reciting her lies to the Inquest about the 10:20 wake-up time and ensuing false story. Particularly egregious is Monika's assurance Jimi was alive and breathing with a pulse after 11am. Also Monika tells of taking "one or two" Vesparax as her usual dose. It is widely known, and also indicated by the manufacturer, that two Vesparax would be a very powerful dose equal to 4 recommended doses. Caesar, once again, prints this entire text without comment. The suggestion is obviously that it stands alone as the truth. Nowhere will the reader ever be informed that this is an infamous statement based on proven lies and a historical monument to non-truth.


Page 37:


Constable Shaw simply repeats Monika's story of finding Jimi in a pool of vomit at 11am. Caesar, once again, has the unholy nerve to 'correct' Shaw's reference to "pool" with a [sic]. The ambulance attendants also spoke of this large pool of vomit independently. This large pool of vomit is important forensic evidence and something Monika was recorded as having lied about. In his second statement Shaw tells of taking possession of the box of Vesparax and the single tablet.

Caesar now moves to Dr Teare's statements. Dr Teare confirms that 1/2 of a tablet was a normal dose. Dr Teare goes on to say he found 100 ml alcohol in the urine. This is not a correct statement and Caesar doesn't catch it. Dr Teare actually found 46mg of alcohol in the urine and then extrapolated that Jimi must have had a 100mg level upon time of Vesparax ingestion. However Dr Teare was going by Monika's timeline as given to the Inquest and assumed Jimi had died around 11:45am. This caused Dr Teare to assume Jimi was digesting the wine from midnight until 11:45am. Dr Teare was totally unaware the real time of death was closer to Dr Crompton's estimate of 5:30am. This would have completely thrown Dr Teare's calculations off to the degree of disqualifying his determination all together.

Dr Teare was unable to directly confirm Jimi died from his claimed "inhalation of vomit" because he wasn't there and the vomit had been removed. While Caesar is highly critical of people making firm statements about things they did not witness he has no problem with Dr Teare confirming the choking on vomit, even though Dr Teare is just repeating it from the hospital forms and never witnessed it himself. Dr Teare explains how barbiturate would relax the organs that prevent fluids from escaping the stomach, however he has no actual evidence that this is what happened to Jimi. He is just repeating the science of the process with the assumption it did happen to Jimi.

The Coroner then makes a summation to exclude any witnessing to the possibility of suicide. They come to the conclusion that there wasn't enough evidence to conclude suicide. This is basically mundane procedure and page-filler. What it does show is that the Inquest was brief and only sought to exclude suicide under the assumption of accidental death by drug misadventure. Nowhere was there any attempt to process the forensic evidence to investigate the possibility of murder.

Dr Thurston, head London Coroner, then signs-off the Inquest with an "Open Verdict", meaning no determined cause of death was found.



Page 38:


Page 38 contains a highlighted copy of the Post-Mortem report. It's basically a general outline of the autopsy data. It should be noted that Dr Teare found 400ml of "free fluid" in Jimi's left chest. I would assume if Dr Bannister said he removed "bottles worth of wine from Jimi's lungs and stomach" that some of this 'free fluid' was remnant wine. This is, most-likely, some remaining wine that Dr Bannister didn't get in his rush to create an oxygen interface in a race with death. I find this to be evidence of Dr Bannister's wine.

Also important is Dr Teare's identification of a small meal including noticeable grains of rice. This is critically important because Jimi was witnessed eating that rice sometime near 3am. We'll show why further on. Most important are the "whole rice grains" noted by Dr Teare.

More critical evidence is shown in Dr Teare's recording of a 5mg per 100ml blood alcohol content. This is a negligible blood alcohol content beneath the legal driving limit and will serve as a critical forensic element further on.

Barbiturate was recorded as .7mg percent of blood and a 3.9mg level was also recorded in the liver.

Here Dr Teare notes the correct urine alcohol level of 46mg. At the very bottom Dr Teare once again repeats his mistake of assuming the urine alcohol level was 100mg at the time of Vesparax ingestion. This is important because it shows the autopsists were capable of interpolating and calculating absorption rates according to known behavior. It is important because the absorption rates of the barbiturate could have been similarly determined and would have proven murder. This calculation can still be done using the very data collected by Dr Teare once it is correctly oriented with the true timeline. Neither Caesar nor the British authorities have any intention to honestly admit this.


.