Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Jimi Hendrix Murder - 40 years ago - The 'Experience'!
#91
We went to see him at the Indianapolis State Fair Coliseum May 11, 1969.

He was the fastest guitar I would ever see.

Members of the audience kept coming to the foot of the stage to snap their flashcubes.

He asked that they not, and when they continued, dedicated the next song to, "some people who never learn."

Voodoo Child and lights up and Satini the little liquid gypsy from Boulder announced she was headed to that peculiar pilgrimage.

And appeared the next day with an interesting story of some lovely parting gifts.

An event between the Nixon Counterinnaugural in DC January 19, and SDS Days of Rage Chicago October 8-11.

What evil to take a talent like that, who could energize a crowd, or perhaps a generation, then, having extracted the better part of the gate, dispatch him in a cowardly way.

The second half of the movie is a Dangerous Page.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4AuxJH2Mj...re=related
Reply
#92
You're lucky Phil.


The long and the short of it is Michael Jeffery was MI-6. He found himself in a prime infiltration spot for the 60's as Jimi's manager. I have good reason to believe Jeffery was accessed by intel and couldn't say no. When Jimi fired him his decision was forced. Jeffery reverted back to his intel training and you know the rest from there.
Reply
#93
Just to prove how under the grip of intel propaganda and evil Wikipedia is they just updated their Monika Dannemann entry to include the pure crap Caesar Glebbeek offered in his publication 'Until We Meet Again'. If you scroll up in this thread you can see I've already torn it apart. I have even more information I can't release just now that even further disproves it. Caesar thinks he scored a coup with his rigor mortis and lividity arguments. I can say I've spoken to several top US forensic experts and they said Caesar's arguments are laughable and don't comprise anything close to the conclusive evidence he claims they are. We've pretty much already shown Jimi was dead for hours simply because the crew members who cleaned the flat would not have let Jimi choke to death next to them if he were still alive. Caesar, being the god-damned ultimate liar he is, simply says the clean-up never happened. That's ridiculous because anyone who has studied this case knows it's confessed fact that the crew members and Eric Burdon cleaned the flat for 5 hours before calling the ambulance. I'll reveal the reason for the lack of rigor mortis in a future work. It's bizarre but credible.


Please note how that evil liar Caesar has now changed the history to Jimi still being alive at the hospital (Monika's self-serving version). I can show you tapes where Dr Seifert says "Jimi was definitely dead when we received him". There are books quoting Dr Seifert as saying the monitor was flat-lining as soon as we put Jimi on it. Dr Bannister is quoted as saying Jimi's cheek linings were cyanosed (blackened), indicating a period of death prior to admission. A new surprise witness, Australian Green party Senator Bob Brown, who was an intern like Bannister back then, said "Jimi was obviously beyond medical remedy when he arrived". Brown also made another comment last month saying "Jimi had obviously been dead for hours when he arrived". Yet, despite all this, Wikipedia chooses to post Caesar's lies, even though they are obviously untrue and easily disproven by the known facts. The way Caesar deals with all these conflicting facts is by ignoring them. He deals with Dr Bannister through sleazy defamation.


Here you have proof of Wikipedia's evil service to intel. Read it and you'll see they present Caesar's bogus arguments as confirmed and credible, even though they say they depend on "reliable sources" (Caesar Glebbeek "reliable"???)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monika_Dannemann



.
Reply
#94
Wikipedia Posthumous Assassination of Jimi Hendrix



Quote:Early on September 18, 1970, Jimi Hendrix died in London. He had spent the latter part of the previous evening at a party and was picked up at close to 3:00 by girlfriend Monika Dannemann and driven to her flat at the Samarkand Hotel, 22 Lansdowne Crescent, Notting Hill. From autopsy data and statements by friends about the evening of September 17, it has been estimated that he died sometime after 3:00, possibly before 4:00, but also possibly later, though no estimate was made at the autopsy, or inquest.[SUP][158][/SUP]
Dannemann claimed in her original testimony that after they returned to her lodgings the evening before, Hendrix, unknown to her, had taken nine of her prescribed Vesparax sleeping pills. The normal medical dose was a half to one tablet as stated in the literature, but Hendrix was unfamiliar with this very strong Belgian brand. According to surgeon John Bannister, the doctor who initially attended to him, Hendrix had asphyxiated in his own vomit, mainly red wine which had filled his airways.[SUP][159][/SUP] Bannister's statement was made in January 1992 to Harry Shapiro, co-author of Electric Gypsy, a book which also featured accusations of malpractice by Monika Dannemann in regards to Bannister's not performing a tracheotomy on Hendrix. He appears to have been using the amount of wine in his system as a reason for not performing a tracheotomy. He was reprimanded for two counts of medical malpractice, and struck off the medical register on April 28, 1992 for fraud.[SUP][160][/SUP] No one else at the time, the other two doctors, the ambulance men, or the police mentioned wine. The only mention of wine was by Monika much earlier, in Electric Gypsy (which Bannister had read), and that Hendrix had drunk some with food earlier that evening and also by Harvey at his, again, much earlier party, which were both several hours prior to death. The autopsy found very little alcohol in his system. The autopsy never mentioned wine, only vomited matter.[SUP][161][/SUP]
Until her death, Dannemann publicly claimed that she had only discovered that her lover had been sick at 11:00 am, but he was breathing, though unconscious and unresponsive (The ambulance was called at 11:18 and arrived 11:27). She also stated that Hendrix was alive when placed in the back of the ambulance at approximately 11:30, and that she rode with him on the way to the hospital.[SUP][162][/SUP]
The ambulance crew later denied she was even there; additionally, Dannemann's comments about the timing of some events that morning often differed in places, varying from interview to interview.[SUP][163][/SUP]
Police and ambulance statements reveal that there was no one but Hendrix in the flat when they arrived at 11:27 am, and not only was he dead when they arrived on the scene, but was fully clothed and had been dead for some time.[SUP][164][/SUP]
Later, Dannemann claimed that former road managers Gerry Stickels and Eric Barrett had been present before the ambulance was called.[SUP][citation needed][/SUP] and had removed some of Hendrix's possessions, including some of his most recent messages. Lyrics written by Hendrix, which were found in the apartment, led Eric Burdon to make a premature announcement on the BBC-TV program 24 Hours that he believed Hendrix had committed suicide. Burdon often claimed he had been telephoned by Dannemann after she discovered that Hendrix failed to wake up.[SUP][165][/SUP]
In 1996, Monika Dannemann committed suicide shortly after being found guilty of contempt of court for repeating a libel against Kathy Etchingham, who had been a girlfriend of Hendrix in the 1960s.[SUP][166][/SUP]
Allegations of murder

A former Animals "roadie", James "Tappy" Wright, published a book in May 2009 claiming Hendrix's manager, Mike Jeffery, admitted to him that he had Hendrix killed because the rock star wanted to end his management contract.[SUP][167][/SUP] John Bannister, one of the doctors who attended to him in 1970 stated in 2009 that it "sounded plausible".[SUP][168][/SUP] Bannister was struck off the Medical register in 1992 for fraud.[SUP][168][/SUP] In 2011 Bob Levine, Wright's long term business associate and Mike Jeffery's assistant manager in N.Y., said he knows that Wright made up these stories to sell his book, that Jeffery didn't have insurance on Hendrix, but that he merely countersigned the Warner Bros. policy that Warner's had taken out as standard practice.[SUP][169][/SUP]
"There was a freak storm across Mallorca and all the phone lines were down. Somebody told Mike that Jimi had been trying to phone him. The first call that got through was to say Jimi was dead. Mike was terribly upset at the thought of Jimi not being able to get through to him." Trixie Sullivan, secretary/assistant for Mike Jeffery[SUP][170][/SUP]





The Wikipedia entry on Hendrix's death is so inaccurate as to constitute legal complicity and accessory after the fact.


All the studied information proves Jimi was murdered close to 5:30am as the circumstantial and forensic evidence shows. After Scotland Yard asked London Coroner's Office Dr Crompton to evaluate the autopsy data he concluded Jimi died no later than 5:30am, according the whole grains of rice the original autopsist Dr Teare witnessed inside Jimi's stomach at autopsy.

This filthy Wikipedia entry ignores the fact a German reporter for the tabloid Bild interviewed Dannemann the next day and she admitted "I gave Jimi the pills". So while Wikipedia enters information to show Jimi did not know the strength of the pills they ignore the fact that they were given to him by a person who did. A person who is on record as lying about it afterwards. Wikipedia chooses to repeat the lies in a way that drastically distorts context.

Dr Bannister was clear in his public statements that Jimi Hendrix did not choke on vomit but instead was drowned in a large volume of red wine. Whoever created this Wikipedia entry was careful to render Dr Bannister's statement in a way that confuses context. If you read this carefully, when the matter comes down to deciding, Wikipedia quickly switches to a crass defamation of Dr Bannister saying he was struck-off the medical register (had his medical license revoked) due to malpractice and fraud. This is patently false. I've investigated this action and it was based only on billing fraud. I've spoken to UK doctors who said Australia, because of its "transportation" exile background, punishes ethics violators more harshly than anywhere and if Dr Bannister committed his billing fraud in Britain he would have had his license back long ago. This is classic of persons who witness intel murders. Dr Bannister's defamation and delicensing is classic of the personal destruction aimed at intel political assassination witnesses, as is the Wikipedia use of this to avoid interpreting the meaning of what Dr Bannister witnessed. The added claim that no one else witnessed this wine but Dr Bannister is false and will be shown as such in a future work. Also Wikipedia ignores the fact Monika Dannemann told author Sharon Lawrence that she poured wine on Jimi's face.

Wikipedia claims that the autopsy found no wine inside Hendrix. In their rush to present crude denial Wikipedia neglects to realize there would be no wine found in Hendrix's lungs at the autopsy since Dr Bannister had suctioned it out in the emergency room. However the autopsist Dr Teare did note 400ml of "Free Fluid" in Hendrix's lung at the autopsy. This was, no doubt, remnant wine. The information Wikipedia offers is criminally misleading and false.

It is long proven that Monika Dannemann was outright lying about what happened. While this entry does point towards that it does so in a way that is way behind where most researchers are on this case. The last part is basically an admission that Monika was lying and Jimi was murdered, but the way it is written you would never know it and all the crap the preceded it in the entire entry deliberately creates the doubt that will used to avoid coming to the correct conclusions. What the last part is really saying is Monika was involved in Jimi's murder and lied about it and then ended up dead when it all came to a head.


In the "Murder Allegations" section they once again present the truth by mentioning Tappy Wright's admission, but, once again, they condition it with Dr Bannister's alleged lack of credibility.

They then quote Michael Jeffery employee Bob Levine as saying Tappy was making it up. First off, they forget the fact that all the forensic evidence backs Tappy Wright. What they don't tell you is in John Mc Dermott's 1992 book Setting The Record Straight that Levine made at least a half dozen comments casting serious suspicion on Michael Jeffery in relation to Hendrix's death. While Wikipedia uses Mr Levine's current statements to discredit Tappy Wright they omit that Levine admitted in Setting The Record Straight that the policy was a separate personal policy bought by Jeffery. Levine forgets that it was he himself who told McDermott he warned Jimi not to sign it because he had a bad feeling about it. It's common sense that the only reason Levine would warn Jimi against signing a policy with the shady, dangerous character Michael Jeffery is because Jeffery would kill Jimi and cash-in on the policy. Ask yourself what other reason would Levine warn Jimi not to sign? Levine goofily forgets that the Warner Brothers artists policy was issued in 1968. Levine himself provides the information that the personal policy in question was shown to him by Jimi in July 1970 in Hawaii. It had to be a second separate policy. Levine is foolish to not realize he wouldn't warn Jimi not to sign a Warner Brothers artists policy which was mandatory. No Levine's sudden amnesia is due to his close proximity and facilitation of Jeffery's mafia loans and money laundering. Wikipedia uses Levine as a credible source in discrediting Tappy Wright. What they fail to inform the reader of is Levine's denial of his own words as recorded in McDermott's Setting The Record Straight is condemning proof of Wright's veracity rather than the opposite. Even worse, I have personally seen a notarized document signed by Bob Levine where he recognizes what Tappy Wright wrote as being true and added "Thank God the truth has finally come out". None of this, of course, being made available to the public in the Wikipedia Jimi Hendrix 'Murder Allegations' section.

Lastly, Trixie Sullivan was a known Jeffery apologist. Her statement that Jeffery was in Majorca when Jimi died is so information-deficient as to be useless in disproving Jeffery's involvement. Jeffery was MI-6 and well-capable of being in London (only 2 hours away by jet) during Jimi's murder.

Once again, Wikipedia proves itself to be the willing assistants of perjurers and intel murderers in their disinformation against the helpless victims. (And don't miss Wikipedia's creating an entire section for Jimi's drug use and arrests right after)





.
Reply
#95
From around 46 minutes on Jim DiEugenio paints the picture of a classic COINTELPRO political assassination:



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fYEttnuZez0
Reply
#96

A very interesting interview with Dick Cavett.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#97
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I

"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
Reply
#98
I'm privy to inside information that a revelation will come out in November changing the face of the Hendrix assassination.


A friend of Jimi Hendrix witnessed something that will heavily reinforce the murder evidence we have been gathering. His book will come out in November.
Reply
#99
Albert Doyle Wrote:Just to prove how under the grip of intel propaganda and evil Wikipedia is they just updated their Monika Dannemann entry to include the pure crap Caesar Glebbeek offered in his publication 'Until We Meet Again'. If you scroll up in this thread you can see I've already torn it apart. I have even more information I can't release just now that even further disproves it. Caesar thinks he scored a coup with his rigor mortis and lividity arguments. I can say I've spoken to several top US forensic experts and they said Caesar's arguments are laughable and don't comprise anything close to the conclusive evidence he claims they are. We've pretty much already shown Jimi was dead for hours simply because the crew members who cleaned the flat would not have let Jimi choke to death next to them if he were still alive. Caesar, being the god-damned ultimate liar he is, simply says the clean-up never happened. That's ridiculous because anyone who has studied this case knows it's confessed fact that the crew members and Eric Burdon cleaned the flat for 5 hours before calling the ambulance. I'll reveal the reason for the lack of rigor mortis in a future work. It's bizarre but credible.


Please note how that evil liar Caesar has now changed the history to Jimi still being alive at the hospital (Monika's self-serving version). I can show you tapes where Dr Seifert says "Jimi was definitely dead when we received him". There are books quoting Dr Seifert as saying the monitor was flat-lining as soon as we put Jimi on it. Dr Bannister is quoted as saying Jimi's cheek linings were cyanosed (blackened), indicating a period of death prior to admission. A new surprise witness, Australian Green party Senator Bob Brown, who was an intern like Bannister back then, said "Jimi was obviously beyond medical remedy when he arrived". Brown also made another comment last month saying "Jimi had obviously been dead for hours when he arrived". Yet, despite all this, Wikipedia chooses to post Caesar's lies, even though they are obviously untrue and easily disproven by the known facts. The way Caesar deals with all these conflicting facts is by ignoring them. He deals with Dr Bannister through sleazy defamation.


Here you have proof of Wikipedia's evil service to intel. Read it and you'll see they present Caesar's bogus arguments as confirmed and credible, even though they say they depend on "reliable sources" (Caesar Glebbeek "reliable"???)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monika_Dannemann

.

Did Eric Burdon ever comment on why he and others cleaned up Hendrix's apartment while he lay dead, and why it took so long? I understand the logical reasons: however, a dead man's reputation would not withstand a toxicology report (if drugs were being searched out in the rooms and flushed), plus such an operation should not take five hours in an apartment.
Reply
No. He realized he said too much in his 1986 autobiography I Used To Be An Animal But I'm All Right Now when he admitted Monika called him at 6am. So in his 2001 book Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood he changed his story to getting to the Samarkand Hotel just in time to see the lights of the ambulance pulling away. If you check the timeline of this event that was 11:30am according to the ambulance records. By doing that Burdon was keeping himself safe from explaining what really happened for the five and a half hours prior.

I've done extensive research on this. The getting rid of the drugs before the police came was a cover story invented for the sole purpose of establishing an alibi to cover up the real reason. The Samarkand efficiency flat was small and Jimi probably had a small stash of hashish and maybe some cocaine. Any stash he had there could be gotten out of the flat in 10 minutes. The 5 hours was obviously a panicked time period where the witnesses cleaned up evidence of what really happened and allowed the perpetrators time to get away. People have observed very little common sense on this. It's fairly simple. If Jimi died from a drug overdose they would have reacted faster and at least tried to save him. Monika had a car so they would have either driven him to a hospital or at least made an effort to save him. It is painfully obvious that the reason this wasn't done is because the participants had knowledge that Jimi was murdered and was murdered by dangerous people that needed to be covered up because they had direct knowledge of who it was and were in a dangerous position themselves.

This is something that I would seriously doubt Scotland Yard would not be able to detect. Scotland Yard knew because Michael Jeffery was MI-6. It explains the whole lack of any serious investigation. Scotland Yard is a criminal accomplice in this matter and should be tried as so. This was a COINTELPRO political assassination carried out by CIA under Nixon. You know, the same old crew that killed Kennedy.
Reply


Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Karen Silkwood: Political murder? Richard Booth 3 4,677 12-10-2019, 01:20 AM
Last Post: Richard Booth
  Russian ambassador murder: a controlled assassin? Richard Coleman 12 54,761 27-12-2016, 11:09 AM
Last Post: Paul Rigby
  Would-be Reagan assassin John Hinckley Jr. to be freed after 35 years Drew Phipps 6 10,263 31-07-2016, 09:26 AM
Last Post: Joseph McBride
  Chavez's bodyguard - recruited by the US before or after Chavez's murder? Paul Rigby 2 5,853 15-03-2016, 05:45 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  RFK: 47 years Alan Dale 1 5,473 05-06-2015, 01:55 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  A Room She Never Slept In: The Murder Of Dorothy Kilgallen Tracy Riddle 0 3,972 25-01-2015, 07:34 PM
Last Post: Tracy Riddle
  Murder of Robert Serro Magda Hassan 0 3,422 02-10-2014, 02:34 PM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  The Murder of Marine Col James Sabow Tosh Plumlee 23 26,399 10-09-2014, 06:39 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  MI5 link to 1984 murder of anti-nuclear campaigner? Jan Klimkowski 4 7,670 18-05-2013, 08:03 AM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Murder in Memphis: Classic Out There Podcasts on MLK Ed Jewett 0 2,317 04-01-2012, 05:26 AM
Last Post: Ed Jewett

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)