Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Falk's 9-11 remarks are 'condemned' by UN sec.-gen.
#1
His position on Palestinian human and legal rights hasn't earned him many friends in the corridors of power.
Quote:Falk's 9-11 remarks are 'condemned' by UN sec.-gen.

By JORDANA HORN
01/25/2011 18:56

Ban Ki-moon's office writes to UN Watch calling the comments "preposterous," an affront to memory of 9-11 victims.

Talkbacks (19) NEW YORK UN Secretary- General Ban Ki-moon's office condemned Richard Falk, a retired Princeton professor and a member of the Genevabased Human Rights Council, for questioning in a recent blog posting whether the 9/11 terror attacks were orchestrated by the US government.

In a letter to Hillel Neuer, executive director of UN Watch, the secretary-general's spokesman Vijay Nambiar wrote that Falk's remarks were "an affront to the memory of the more than 3,000 people who died in the attack."

RELATED:
'World must protect Palestinians from Israeli violence'
UN envoy: Settlements major obstacle to Palestinian state

He added that "representatives however eminent they may be in their fields have a clear responsibility to uphold the high standards of the United Nations and the Council."

Falk had endorsed a book by 9/11 conspiracy theorist David Ray Griffin. In his posting, Falk praised Griffin's book which claims the Bush administration was responsible for the attacks as "authoritative."

Dismissing Falk's remarks as "despicable," US Ambassador to the UN Susan Rice released a statement Tuesday condemning him for endorsing "the slurs of conspiracy theorists."

"The United States has in the past been critical of Mr. Falk's one-sided and politicized approach to his work for the UN including his failure to condemn deliberate human rights abuses by Hamas but these blog comments are in another category altogether," Rice said.

"In my view, Mr. Falk's latest commentary is so noxious that it should finally be plain to all that he should no longer continue in his position on behalf of the UN," she asserted.

Neuer said he was generally pleased with the secretary-general's response, but hoped that the head of the Human Rights Council would oust Falk.

"We welcome the secretary-general's unequivocal condemnation of the despicable comments by this official of the UN Human Rights Council," said Neuer. "And we urge Mr. Ban, together with UN rights chief Navi Pillay, to take the next logical step and call on Falk who is a serial offender with zero credibility to be removed."

Falk's current term expires in May, but many experts are automatically renewed.
http://www.jpost.com/International/Artic...?id=205192
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply
#2
Magda Hassan Wrote:His position on Palestinian human and legal rights hasn't earned him many friends in the corridors of power.

I get so weary with this sort of stuff. It's near infinitely depressing. Whenever ANYONE with real or potential influence in world councils, displays any semblance of genuine conscience and concern for a common humanity; or seeks to shed light on the machinations that drive the REAL hidden agendas of REAL power, he/she is comprehensively rubbished, undermined, ridiculed or otherwise effectively silenced by pure Machiavellian evil.

What makes this particularly nauseating is the sanctimony of Rice and Neuer with their charge of Falk's writings being 'an affront to the memory of the 3,000 people who died'. Moon is a mere puppet functionary.

... And the truly depressing thing is that, for masses of people in the West, IT WORKS.

God help humanity is all I can say.
Peter Presland

".....there is something far worse than Nazism, and that is the hubris of the Anglo-American fraternities, whose routine is to incite indigenous monsters to war, and steer the pandemonium to further their imperial aims"
Guido Preparata. Preface to 'Conjuring Hitler'[size=12][size=12]
"Never believe anything until it has been officially denied"
Claud Cockburn

[/SIZE][/SIZE]
Reply
#3
Yes, I agree Peter. Here we see the same old tactic at play.

It is a mechanism to keep anyone who is anyone, in lock-step with the accepted propaganda wisdom of the day, or suffer the slings and arrows etc.

Independence of thought is to be rubbished at every turn.
The shadow is a moral problem that challenges the whole ego-personality, for no one can become conscious of the shadow without considerable moral effort. To become conscious of it involves recognizing the dark aspects of the personality as present and real. This act is the essential condition for any kind of self-knowledge.
Carl Jung - Aion (1951). CW 9, Part II: P.14
Reply
#4
David Guyatt Wrote:Yes, I agree Peter. Here we see the same old tactic at play.

It is a mechanism to keep anyone who is anyone, in lock-step with the accepted propaganda wisdom of the day, or suffer the slings and arrows etc.

Independence of thought is to be rubbished at every turn.

Nevertheless, who in their right mind would not question the handling, or lack of it, of the 9/11 tragedy by the US govt?
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)