|
Prouty on Lansdale
|
26-01-2011, 01:55 AM
Greg,
Thanks for the JFKresearch archive link. I have been looking for what happened to it for a while now. Glad its not gone - thanks again! Zach
26-01-2011, 02:01 AM
Dawn:
I believe he is wrong on the 3 tramps. I have come to believe they are Gedney etc, as per Lansdale, well that is iffy. jim
26-01-2011, 02:15 AM
Zach Robertson Wrote:Greg, Your welcome, Zach. And thanks to the generous offer of Deep Politics Forum's owners to host it here!
GO_SECURE
monk "It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep." James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
26-01-2011, 02:17 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:...as per Lansdale, well that is iffy. Very impressive opinion, Jim--since you knew Lansdale so well.:banghead:
GO_SECURE
monk "It is difficult to abolish prejudice in those bereft of ideas. The more hatred is superficial, the more it runs deep." James Hepburn -- Farewell America (1968)
26-01-2011, 03:46 AM
Greg:
There is a saying, "Extraordinary claims demand extraordinary evidence". If you are going to say that Lansdale was actually in Dealey Plaza, right after the assassination--which breaks every rule of covert ops--then you better have extraordinary evidence. Which I do not consider an ID of the back of the head to be. 
26-01-2011, 05:27 AM
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:Dawn: If Jim demands extraordinary proof for extraordinary claims, I want to see his extraordinary proof that Gedney, Doyle and Abrams were the three tramps. And if he quotes the extraordinary book OSWALD TALKED by the LaFontaines which supports that thesis, I'm gonna throw up. Jack
26-01-2011, 05:35 AM
Greg Burnham Wrote:Jim DiEugenio Wrote:...as per Lansdale, well that is iffy. Greg...I have numerous friends, probably dozens, that I would recognize immediately from a rear view. It is the total person, not just facial features; height, weight, hair, posture and even habits or wearing apparrel all enter into it...no IFFY to it at all. In fact in a Dealey Plaza photo I recognized a friend that I had not seen since 1949. It was Bill Kirkpatrick, who had been a classmate of mine at college. There was no mistaking him from a 3/4 rear view, about like the Lansdale view. Jack
26-01-2011, 06:03 AM
''greg...best b..''Thank you for that, Beans. It's good to be here. I'm sure you noted (?) that the archives of JFKresearch.com is now hosted here: JFKresearch Assassination Forum Archive ''
Last edited by Greg Burnham; Today at 07:48 PM.
I SURE HAVE :wavey::tea::wirlitzer::humble::dancingman::cheer::thumbsup: ALREADY IT IS BEING REFERENCED TO AND LINKED FROM A POST ON THE E.F...RE JACK'S RESEARCH NORTON LHO PHOTO'S, IT WILL ONLY BECOME MORE SO....THANKS TO ALL INVOLVED AGAIN, I THINK THIS MAKES 3 OR 4 TIMES NOW, SO I SHALL KNOCK IT OFF...HENCEFORTH..:wavey:b
26-01-2011, 06:14 AM
(This post was last modified: 26-01-2011, 06:34 AM by Bernice Moore.)
a few to compare for jim..and i have added his ring hand...b
26-01-2011, 06:29 AM
(This post was last modified: 26-01-2011, 06:46 AM by Seamus Coogan.)
Greg Burnham Wrote:Jim DiEugenio Wrote:...as per Lansdale, well that is iffy. Isn't it about time Greg (master researcher) that you went round and told everyone the glorious news about gunmen coming out of every orifice in Dealey? In particularly your backing of the defunct Storm Drain angle. Hmmmmmmmm now isn't Jim's caution with the photo's a little more sensible an option than plunging on in? Well Greg it appears you plunge in on quite a few things doesn't it? Like just about any new fad that comes along. Why don't you come back and tell me how credible a guy Chauncey Holt is? Sheesh Greg while your at it let's hear about your wonderful theories about how Zapruder was in on the plot? Tell me how credible JVB is and how a study of Oswald's penis will be useful to the case? How about let's discuss crop circles (I see they are advocated on your site as is a link to John Hankeys appalling video JFK II) You may have missed the bus on that goldmine Greg. Of course you can always find flaws in Jim Di's arguments by using such good and well researched links to your site. Have you seen Hankey call Jim Di and I intelligence assets? So before you criticise anybodies opinions on Lansdale or any other researcher. I'd think real, real, real long and hard about the very ones you advocate for and why Greg (more so than yourself by a country mile no make it continents) Jim DiEugenio is one of the most respected researchers currently operating! Furthermore, some people may find that a little on the nose. But it's why I'll be hard pressed to use anything you have ever done in the field. Hows them apples? Oh I say this not out of being vindictive. But because I won't lose any sleep if you don't use mine. Should you start too I'd be seriously worried about my massive drop in standards! |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
