People Could Have Planted Bombs In the World Trade Center Without Anyone Noticing

[Ed Jewett]

People Could Have Planted Bombs In the World Trade Center Without Anyone Noticing

http://911blogger.com/news/2011-05-23/pe...e-noticing

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2011/05/n...le-to.html

[Charles Drago]

On more than one occasion I directed readers of DPF to published evidence describing how art students managed to inhabit a tiny office/closet in one of the towers, remove its window, put out a mini-balcony, and have their pictures taken while hanging over the city.

And they got away scott free.

We must consider the possibility that that escapade was some sort of security test, but that's a discussion for another thread.

[Ed Jewett]

I would think getting away with such things in a building of such mammoth capacity would be child's play for someone who had cased the joint, was familiar with it and its rhythms, and could meld into its culture and ambience. I don't look or act like a New Yorker, so I'd not qualify. And I have too much precipophobia (? sp) to even consider hanging out there. (Geesh, I got disoriented on those high-speed elevators.)

[Jeffrey Orling]

My own understanding of the vulnerability to a gravity driven floor collapse that could be initiated with the destruction of as few as 3 floors would indicated that as few as 12 columns could be "taken" out. These 12 columns which span 3 floors and are rather small in cross section up top would indeed be vulnerable to less than spectacular "attack.

Observations indicate the columns HAD to be destroyed up there because the ones above which conceivably could survive a sequence of collapsing floors are not seen. So the destruction which initiated the gravity driven collapse seems to have attacked columns. It might have at the same time destroyed the beam stub outlookers which secured the support channel for the core side of the floor trusses at the same time. Can't tell.

But placement would be inside the shafts or column enclosures for columns 501, 504, 505, 508, 701, 801, 1001, 1004, 1005, 1008, 708 and 807on the outlooker beam stubs.

The column splices were about 3' above the floor level... every third floor and placing a bomb or incendiary onto the beam stub from the floor level would involve two sets of 36' long columns...those above and below the device placement.

If this concept is sound it sounds like a not very complex "rigging" operation... and it might not even have required complex or sophisticatedOR precision timing or detchord. etc. If the devices were set to "go to work" at say 9:00 am -9:30... as each one destroyed a pair of columns connections (severing it from being able to transfer loads to the column below)... the other core columns would begin to take up the load of the destroyed columns.

As more and more of the 14 columns go down, more and more load is taken up by fewer and fewer remaining columns until that load exceeds their safe working load and they begin to buckle and actually it goes rather rapidly once that point is reached. Then the is a mini CD and the tower above this attack zone then descends delivering all it's mass to the level of the attack of those columns... and the floors above begin to avalanche down to the ground.

I think this could be set with little notice by anyone... especially if there was an unoccupied floor up there above 93. And if there were already access panels at these column locations who would even notice at all if workman seemed to be servicing some building system which are running vertically adjacent to the columns?

[Jan Klimkowski]

Jeffrey - under your scenario, would it be necessary to "sync up" the strike of the plane with the explosions to ensure that what bystanders and cameras viewed was consistent?

[Kyle Burnett]

What bystanders and cameras viewed isn't consistent with the strikes of the planes, or the notion that there were only bombs near the top. Here's a couple of examples to the contrary:

[Jan Klimkowski]

Kyle - the firefighter testimony is particularly valuable.

Returning to my "syncing up" question to Jeffrey, is there any extant footage of an explosion BEFORE the first plane strike?

[Kyle Burnett]

Jeffery's senerio suggests "devices were set to "go to work" at say 9:00 am -9:30", about 15 minutes after the first plane strike.

[Jeffrey Orling]

My previous post was pure speculation about how a gravity driven collapse could be initiated.

One would need to consider the much broader question of how the perps wanted to control the magic show and the media which would spread the narrative and support it. My suspicion is that this was to be the mother of all media events in the tradition of McLuhan. So I suspect there was due consideration on how to get the most bang for the buck so to speak.

I don't know anything about explosives or incendiaries and especially the type, size and "power" of same to do the damage required. However, I think we can assume the plane strike WERE part of "the plan" if nothing else to make the hijacker to islamic fundamentalist connection.

But they may have done MORE than establish the link to a fall guys. Perhaps (PURE SPECULATION) they were the detonators as it were for the pre planted explosives/incendiaries. Let's assume that those explosives were above the plane strike zone AND fire would typically spread upward. We did see that I believe and perhaps the flames from the exploding planes fuel tanks ignited the pre planted incendiaries which then began to attack the key locations of the steel so that it would both unload some and upload other columns which would lead to a progressive and rapid column failure once the safety factor (yield strength) was exceeded. It would at the same time begin to sever the floor to column connections at the core side... there were only 24 and at most 28 of them... so burning them off... cutting them would also overload the ones which weren't attacked and these too would reach the yield point and rapidly fail. The later floor failures likely came first.. but it took 4 or 5 floor masses to really kick off a ROOSD. You don't smoke at a gas station because you can set of a huge fire/explosion and so perhaps the planes acted in a similar manner to ignite the pre planted devices which would take varyng times to "do the job"... so it wasn't a BANG and the towers fall... but a progressive failure until is "let go" because what was left was overwhelmed.

The story was it was fires... fires take time... and so it was.

[Ed Jewett]

"
One World Trade Center is a fitting name. The criminal 'elite' are blatantly telling us what is the planned outcome of their false flag of 9/11 and planet wide reign of terror. ...."

http://kennysideshow.blogspot.com/2011/0...-deal.html