13-12-2011, 04:11 AM
Contagion and H5N1: Propaganda As Art and the Designer Armageddon Bug
Posted on December 12, 2011 by willylomanby Scott Creighton
(I don't do "doom saying" on this blog and don't be mistaken, that is not what I am doing with this article. But some things are just so damn obvious, the connections that you can't help but make, you have to write about them whether you want to or not. The rush to production of the film, the strange timing of the creation of this new strain of H5N1, the pending global economic collapse, the FEMA camps and the recent ads to staff them via military and contractors… the timing of all of this is extremely odd to say the least.)
Last night I stayed up and watched Contagion, a new film that came out on Sept. 9th of this year. It's an interesting film that's pure propaganda, I mean there is absolutely no other way of looking at it.It's a fantasy world retelling of the H1N1 Swine Flu "Pandemic" of 2009 in which all the sins of the WHO and the CDC are washed clean and the bad guys are the bloggers who push fear and make money while doing it. The tagline for the film is "Nothing Spreads Like Fear"
The film reminded me of the recent announcement of the new strain of the H5N1 bird flu virus which was made at the influenza conference in Malta (of all places) just a month ago. For some reason Ron Fouchier of the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam took an already existing strain of the influenza virus, the H5N1 strain to be exact and he modified it to make it some kind of horribly lethal and very contagious new creation which can really only be described at this point as a potential bio-weapon.
I'll get back to the propaganda in a minute and when I do I will highlight a little actual history with the timing of the production of the film, who helped them make it, what it ultimately says about the CDC, the WHO, and each and every blogger on the planet (hint: not only is it insulting "graffiti with punctuation", it's also suggesting that we are dangerous and will cause millions of deaths… yeah… millions)
But first, let's look at the newest pandemic potential bio-weapon; where it came from and who owns it (you might be surprised to find out that your tax-payer dollars paid for it's creation… no kidding)
Part 1: The New H5N1 Virus and You How Your Money Paid for the Designer Armageddon Bug
H5N1 has been around for a long while and though it is dangerous once contracted, it doesn't transfer to humans very easily. It also doesn't easily transfer from human to human either which makes it rather useless as a bio-weapon, or at least it was useless, until Mr. Fouchier came along.
The story of this new strain goes some thing like this: for some reason Mr. Fouchier decided to take a rather impotent virus and after a mere 5 mutations (forced by him in the lab and which had never happened in nature by itself) made it one of the most deadly strains of influenza ever seen.
Reportedly the H5N1 virus kills 60% of the people who are infected by it. That number is outrageously high to say the least but H5N1 was hardly on the bio-weapon radar because in it's 10 years of existence, there have only been 600 reported cases across the world. That's because in ten years it never mutated in the way that Fouchier claims it could "easily mutate" by itself in nature.
Mr. Fouchier mutated H5N1 so that it would be airborne, capable of being transferred from person to person by simply getting close to someone who is infected.
The argument is actually being made that he should publish his findings, complete with a recipe for how to make this global killer, to the general public.
If this thing is as dangerous as they say (and some have already claimed it could wipe out 50% of the world's population. To put that in perspective, the Spanish Flu pandemic which was one of the worst in history, only took out 1% of the world's population.) then there is absolutely no reason to publish the manner in which it was created.
Imagine someone publishing a how-to booklet on making a nuclear dirty bomb or a step-by-step process to get on board and hijack planes in order to fly them into large professional buildings in New York. They would be locked up and in fact, Obama recently killed a U.S. citizen on the CLAIM that he simply encouraged terrorists acts. Imagine how they would react if someone published the process to make weaponized anthrax or VX gas.
There is no legitimate reason to publish this process. If they need people to create an anti-virus and cure, they simply hand over the information directly to whichever labs they feel are capable of doing so, just like they always do in cases such as this. The idea that they have to publish in order to create a counter-measure is counter intuitive to say the least.
For some reason though a U.S. agency is debating that topic right now.
But here is the caveat that few if any are writing about… it's not Mr. Fouchier's discovery… technically, it's ours. We paid Fouchier to create this thing and that's why a U.S. agency is making the decision.
Taken from a Christian website article dated May of 2011: What Evangelical Leaders are Saying About the End Times ""The end of times is something that we all expect and hope for and look forward to but most Christians aren't in the business of trying to predict that date. They are working toward that date." Dr. Thomas B. Slater
So let me get this straight - it was announced in Malta that a killer virus was created in a lab that was paid for by a U.S. agency headed up by a guy who went to Yale and has direct ties to the Vatican scientific think tank and the Bush administration, who apparently is looking forward to the rapture.
Does that about sum it all up? Good. Let's move on.
Part 2: Propaganda As Art
In the film Contagion they go to great lengths to portray the CDC and WHO employees, hedge fund managers, and bio-lab owners as heroes across the board and the blogger and the virus itself are the only bad guys with the exception of the random few faceless looters who pop-up every now and then.
The story is so out of whack with reality, they try to make the case that in fact it's the bloggers who make the millions of dollars profiting from the hype of the pandemic and they never, NEVER refer to the many connected opportunists who cashed in their connections with the CDC and the WHO back when H1N1 was CLEARLY over-hyped back in 2009.
Remember, this film was rushed into the market having only begun the project in Sept. of 2010 (it came out in Sept of this year) and was written by Scott Burns, the producer of Al Gore's mistake riddled global warming propaganda film, An Inconvenient Truth. Helping write the script and produce the film was the CDC.
So what happened in 2010 that preceded the rush to make this film?
A number of complaints, not from "bloggers" but from people WITHIN the CDC and WHO system, came out accusing connected members of the CDC and the WHO of over-hyping the threat assessment of H1N1 in order to make cash off the FEAR and PANIC they created.
That's what happened. (please pardon the long quote from the Wiki page on the 2009 Pandemic but it is important to understand the climate in which this piece of propaganda was created)
That's interesting isn't it?
According to the Wiki page on the film, and I just watched it so I know it's true, the only people in the entire film who behave badly for their own salvation or benefit, is the blogger who ends up being the only villain in the film.
Actually, I was one of the first to point out that the WHO and the CDC were over-hyping the threat assessment.
I was trying to calm fears while the CDC and the MSM were fanning the flames of panic and fear.
I also never recommended that people rush out and get the vaccine. In fact, if I recall correctly, I was strongly opposed to legislation that would have made getting the vaccine mandatory though I didn't do what some bloggers did and claim that the vaccine itself was the Illuminati attempt to poison or sterilize the general population. I wrote that the manufacturers of the vaccines wanted massive profits and they were using their connections with the politicians and the WHO to generate as much as possible.
Everything I wrote then has been verified as accurate since. Not by "bloggers" or graffiti artists with punctuation, but by highly trained professionals in the field who put themselves at great personal risk to come out and blow the whistle about what they saw the WHO doing during the pandemic of 2009.
I never got the vaccine. I didn't die. And the "pandemic" petered out nearly as quickly as it appeared.
But if they watch Contagion the general population will come away with a completely different story one that not only reverses the rolls of the WHO and the bloggers who tried to hold them accountable and maintain calm in the face of their generated panic, but the story actually implies that the blogger is guilty of "manslaughter" and possibly the deaths of millions of people.
In Contagion, the public threat is the blogger and as the title implies, that threat is even greater than the threat posed by the pandemic itself.
Why Now?
Is it wrong to put these two things together and wonder out loud "why now?"? Is it wrong to draw connections between the creation of this blatant propaganda piece and the agency which created the new Designer Armageddon Bug? Is it wrong to worry about such deliberate misinformation about an important event in our recent history that seems to suggest that public safety demands we stop those damn bloggers from killing Americans? Is it wrong to worry about the announcement of the Designer Armageddon Bug while they are tooling up their FEMA camps?
I don't know if it's wrong or not. You draw your own conclusions about what's happening here. But like the guy said, if you see a tidal wave rising in the distance, it isn't irresponsible to warn your fellow beachcombers before running away. It might piss off the globalists who want to depopulate that area of Indonesia so they can turn it into resorts, but pissing off globalists isn't against the law just yet.
But give them time and a few more movies like Contagion and it will be.
(I don't do "doom saying" on this blog and don't be mistaken, that is not what I am doing with this article. But some things are just so damn obvious, the connections that you can't help but make, you have to write about them whether you want to or not. The rush to production of the film, the strange timing of the creation of this new strain of H5N1, the pending global economic collapse, the FEMA camps and the recent ads to staff them via military and contractors… the timing of all of this is extremely odd to say the least.)
Last night I stayed up and watched Contagion, a new film that came out on Sept. 9th of this year. It's an interesting film that's pure propaganda, I mean there is absolutely no other way of looking at it.It's a fantasy world retelling of the H1N1 Swine Flu "Pandemic" of 2009 in which all the sins of the WHO and the CDC are washed clean and the bad guys are the bloggers who push fear and make money while doing it. The tagline for the film is "Nothing Spreads Like Fear"
The film reminded me of the recent announcement of the new strain of the H5N1 bird flu virus which was made at the influenza conference in Malta (of all places) just a month ago. For some reason Ron Fouchier of the Erasmus Medical Centre in Rotterdam took an already existing strain of the influenza virus, the H5N1 strain to be exact and he modified it to make it some kind of horribly lethal and very contagious new creation which can really only be described at this point as a potential bio-weapon.
I'll get back to the propaganda in a minute and when I do I will highlight a little actual history with the timing of the production of the film, who helped them make it, what it ultimately says about the CDC, the WHO, and each and every blogger on the planet (hint: not only is it insulting "graffiti with punctuation", it's also suggesting that we are dangerous and will cause millions of deaths… yeah… millions)
But first, let's look at the newest pandemic potential bio-weapon; where it came from and who owns it (you might be surprised to find out that your tax-payer dollars paid for it's creation… no kidding)
Part 1: The New H5N1 Virus and You How Your Money Paid for the Designer Armageddon Bug
H5N1 has been around for a long while and though it is dangerous once contracted, it doesn't transfer to humans very easily. It also doesn't easily transfer from human to human either which makes it rather useless as a bio-weapon, or at least it was useless, until Mr. Fouchier came along.
The story of this new strain goes some thing like this: for some reason Mr. Fouchier decided to take a rather impotent virus and after a mere 5 mutations (forced by him in the lab and which had never happened in nature by itself) made it one of the most deadly strains of influenza ever seen.
Reportedly the H5N1 virus kills 60% of the people who are infected by it. That number is outrageously high to say the least but H5N1 was hardly on the bio-weapon radar because in it's 10 years of existence, there have only been 600 reported cases across the world. That's because in ten years it never mutated in the way that Fouchier claims it could "easily mutate" by itself in nature.
Mr. Fouchier mutated H5N1 so that it would be airborne, capable of being transferred from person to person by simply getting close to someone who is infected.
"In the laboratory, it was possible to change H5N1 into an aerosol transmissible virus that can easily be rapidly spread through the air. This process could also take place in a natural setting." Mr. Fouchier, Erasmus
After creating this super bug and seeing that it has the potential to kill off half the population of the world, for some other unknown reason, Mr. Fouchier doesn't destroy it immediately but rather he keeps the strain alive and trips down to Malta to share his "discovery" with other scientists.The argument is actually being made that he should publish his findings, complete with a recipe for how to make this global killer, to the general public.
"Fouchier wants his study to be published. So does virologist Yoshihiro Kawaoka, who led similar research in collaboration with the University of Wisconsin, Madison, and the University of Tokyo, and reached comparable results. And it is up to NSABB to give them the green light" Russia Today
So a U.S. government agency under the rubric of the Department of Health and Human Services is going to decide whether or not the recipe for how to make this global killer is published to the world. That's interesting.If this thing is as dangerous as they say (and some have already claimed it could wipe out 50% of the world's population. To put that in perspective, the Spanish Flu pandemic which was one of the worst in history, only took out 1% of the world's population.) then there is absolutely no reason to publish the manner in which it was created.
Imagine someone publishing a how-to booklet on making a nuclear dirty bomb or a step-by-step process to get on board and hijack planes in order to fly them into large professional buildings in New York. They would be locked up and in fact, Obama recently killed a U.S. citizen on the CLAIM that he simply encouraged terrorists acts. Imagine how they would react if someone published the process to make weaponized anthrax or VX gas.
There is no legitimate reason to publish this process. If they need people to create an anti-virus and cure, they simply hand over the information directly to whichever labs they feel are capable of doing so, just like they always do in cases such as this. The idea that they have to publish in order to create a counter-measure is counter intuitive to say the least.
For some reason though a U.S. agency is debating that topic right now.
But here is the caveat that few if any are writing about… it's not Mr. Fouchier's discovery… technically, it's ours. We paid Fouchier to create this thing and that's why a U.S. agency is making the decision.
In addition, the safety was monitored by international experts, partly because the study was commissioned by the American National Institutes of Health (NIH) Erasmus MC
The National Institute of Health is also under the Department of Health and Human Services and is currently headed up by a guy named Francis Collins. Francis Collins:- attended Yale University
- was given the Presidential Medal of Freedom by George W. Bush
- is an outspoken born again evangelical Christian
- Pope Benedict XVI has appointed Francis Collins, director of the National Institutes of Health, to the Vatican's Pontifical Academy of Sciences.
Taken from a Christian website article dated May of 2011: What Evangelical Leaders are Saying About the End Times ""The end of times is something that we all expect and hope for and look forward to but most Christians aren't in the business of trying to predict that date. They are working toward that date." Dr. Thomas B. Slater
So let me get this straight - it was announced in Malta that a killer virus was created in a lab that was paid for by a U.S. agency headed up by a guy who went to Yale and has direct ties to the Vatican scientific think tank and the Bush administration, who apparently is looking forward to the rapture.
Does that about sum it all up? Good. Let's move on.
Part 2: Propaganda As Art
In the film Contagion they go to great lengths to portray the CDC and WHO employees, hedge fund managers, and bio-lab owners as heroes across the board and the blogger and the virus itself are the only bad guys with the exception of the random few faceless looters who pop-up every now and then.
The story is so out of whack with reality, they try to make the case that in fact it's the bloggers who make the millions of dollars profiting from the hype of the pandemic and they never, NEVER refer to the many connected opportunists who cashed in their connections with the CDC and the WHO back when H1N1 was CLEARLY over-hyped back in 2009.
Remember, this film was rushed into the market having only begun the project in Sept. of 2010 (it came out in Sept of this year) and was written by Scott Burns, the producer of Al Gore's mistake riddled global warming propaganda film, An Inconvenient Truth. Helping write the script and produce the film was the CDC.
So what happened in 2010 that preceded the rush to make this film?
A number of complaints, not from "bloggers" but from people WITHIN the CDC and WHO system, came out accusing connected members of the CDC and the WHO of over-hyping the threat assessment of H1N1 in order to make cash off the FEAR and PANIC they created.
That's what happened. (please pardon the long quote from the Wiki page on the 2009 Pandemic but it is important to understand the climate in which this piece of propaganda was created)
In January 2010, Wolfgang Wodarg, a German deputy who trained as a physician and now chairs the health committee at the Council of Europe,claimed major firms had organised a "campaign of panic" to put pressure on the World Health Organisation (WHO) to declare a "false pandemic" to sell vaccines. Wodarg said the WHO's "false pandemic" flu campaign is "one of the greatest medicine scandals of the century". He said that the "false pandemic" campaign began last May in Mexico City, when a hundred or so "normal" reported influenza cases were declared to be the beginning of a threatening new pandemic, although he said there was little scientific evidence for this. Nevertheless he argued that the WHO, "in cooperation with some big pharmaceutical companies and their scientists, re-defined pandemics", removing the statement that "an enormous amount of people have contracted the illness or died" from its existing definition and replacing it by stating simply that there has to be a virus, spreading beyond borders and to which people have no immunity.[SUP][97][/SUP] The WHO responded by stating that they take their duty to provide independent advice seriously and guarded against interference from outside interests. Announcing a review of the WHO's actions, spokeswoman Fadela Chaib stated: "Criticism is part of an outbreak cycle. We expect and indeed welcome criticism and the chance to discuss it".[SUP][98][/SUP][SUP][99][/SUP] In March 2010, the Council of Europe launched an enquiry into "the influence of the pharmaceutical companies on the global swine flu campaign", and a preliminary report is in preparation.[SUP][100][/SUP]
On 12 April 2010, Keiji Fukuda, the WHO's top influenza expert, stated that the system leading to the declaration of a pandemic led to confusion about H1N1 circulating around the world, and he expressed concern that there was a failure to communicate in regard to uncertainties about the new virus, which turned out to be not as deadly as feared. WHO Director-General Margaret Chan has appointed 29 flu experts from outside the organization to conduct a review of WHO's handling of the H1N1 flu pandemic. She has told them, "We want a frank, critical, transparent, credible and independent review of our performance".[SUP][101][/SUP]
In June 2010, Fiona Godlee, editor-in-chief of the BMJ, published an editorial which criticised the WHO, saying that an investigation had disclosed thatsome of the experts advising WHO on the pandemic had financial ties with drug companies which were producing antivirals and vaccines.[SUP][102][/SUP]Margaret Chan, Director-General of the WHO, replied stating, "Without question, the BMJ feature and editorial will leave many readers with the impression that WHO's decision to declare a pandemic was at least partially influenced by a desire to boost the profits of the pharmaceutical industry. The bottom line, however, is that decisions to raise the level of pandemic alert were based on clearly defined virological and epidemiological criteria. It is hard to bend these criteria, no matter what the motive".[SUP][101][/SUP] In August 2010, the Daily Mail printed an article stating that "a third of the experts advising the World Health Organisation about the swine flu pandemic had ties to drugs firms" and that of the 20 members of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, which advised the British Government on swine flu, 11 had done work for the pharmaceutical industry or were linked to it through their universities.[SUP][103] [/SUP]
So there was clearly a crisis of credibility existing the world when it came to how the CDC and more importantly the WHO handled the 2009 "pandemic" of H1N1. Then along comes the CDC and they hire the guy who wrote another piece of propaganda to write this one as well.On 12 April 2010, Keiji Fukuda, the WHO's top influenza expert, stated that the system leading to the declaration of a pandemic led to confusion about H1N1 circulating around the world, and he expressed concern that there was a failure to communicate in regard to uncertainties about the new virus, which turned out to be not as deadly as feared. WHO Director-General Margaret Chan has appointed 29 flu experts from outside the organization to conduct a review of WHO's handling of the H1N1 flu pandemic. She has told them, "We want a frank, critical, transparent, credible and independent review of our performance".[SUP][101][/SUP]
In June 2010, Fiona Godlee, editor-in-chief of the BMJ, published an editorial which criticised the WHO, saying that an investigation had disclosed thatsome of the experts advising WHO on the pandemic had financial ties with drug companies which were producing antivirals and vaccines.[SUP][102][/SUP]Margaret Chan, Director-General of the WHO, replied stating, "Without question, the BMJ feature and editorial will leave many readers with the impression that WHO's decision to declare a pandemic was at least partially influenced by a desire to boost the profits of the pharmaceutical industry. The bottom line, however, is that decisions to raise the level of pandemic alert were based on clearly defined virological and epidemiological criteria. It is hard to bend these criteria, no matter what the motive".[SUP][101][/SUP] In August 2010, the Daily Mail printed an article stating that "a third of the experts advising the World Health Organisation about the swine flu pandemic had ties to drugs firms" and that of the 20 members of the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies, which advised the British Government on swine flu, 11 had done work for the pharmaceutical industry or were linked to it through their universities.[SUP][103] [/SUP]
That's interesting isn't it?
According to the Wiki page on the film, and I just watched it so I know it's true, the only people in the entire film who behave badly for their own salvation or benefit, is the blogger who ends up being the only villain in the film.
A conspiratorially minded freelance internet journalist, Alan Krumwiede (Jude Law), posts the first video blogs about the disease, and in one of them apparently appears sick and later claims that he recovered using ahomeopathic cure called forsythia. Panicked people attempting to obtain forsythia overwhelm pharmacies and also accelerate the contagion as infected and healthy people congregate. Krumwiede leaps to national attention and, during a television interview, accuses Dr. Cheever from CDC of informing friends and family to leave Chicago before a quarantine is imposed. It is later revealed Krumwiede was never sick with the unknown virus but was attempting to boost demand on behalf of investors in the companies producing and distributing the homeopathic treatment. He is taken by the police accused of conspiracy and fraud, but is soon released after his 12 million blog readers collect and pay his bail. Krumwiede is last seen returning to his internet journalism, interviewing the people attending the MEV-1 vaccination lines and questioning the safety of the rushed immunotherapy treatment and its yet unseen secondary and adverse effects..Wiki page Contagion
As a blogger who wrote about the Bird Flu "pandemic" back in 2009, I can honestly tell you I never made a nickel off it. Al Gore's hedge fund did. They made a lot of money off it, especially after he went to congress and asked them to sink billions into the company his investment firm was hooked up with. He smirked when someone at those hearings asked him about that connection. He replied with the same dogma that the corrupt always do when someone has the poor taste to make public such connections; he asked if the congressman was anti-business and said their was nothing wrong with generating profits to help the country or something sleezy to that effect.Actually, I was one of the first to point out that the WHO and the CDC were over-hyping the threat assessment.
I was trying to calm fears while the CDC and the MSM were fanning the flames of panic and fear.
I also never recommended that people rush out and get the vaccine. In fact, if I recall correctly, I was strongly opposed to legislation that would have made getting the vaccine mandatory though I didn't do what some bloggers did and claim that the vaccine itself was the Illuminati attempt to poison or sterilize the general population. I wrote that the manufacturers of the vaccines wanted massive profits and they were using their connections with the politicians and the WHO to generate as much as possible.
Everything I wrote then has been verified as accurate since. Not by "bloggers" or graffiti artists with punctuation, but by highly trained professionals in the field who put themselves at great personal risk to come out and blow the whistle about what they saw the WHO doing during the pandemic of 2009.
I never got the vaccine. I didn't die. And the "pandemic" petered out nearly as quickly as it appeared.
But if they watch Contagion the general population will come away with a completely different story one that not only reverses the rolls of the WHO and the bloggers who tried to hold them accountable and maintain calm in the face of their generated panic, but the story actually implies that the blogger is guilty of "manslaughter" and possibly the deaths of millions of people.
In Contagion, the public threat is the blogger and as the title implies, that threat is even greater than the threat posed by the pandemic itself.
Why Now?
Is it wrong to put these two things together and wonder out loud "why now?"? Is it wrong to draw connections between the creation of this blatant propaganda piece and the agency which created the new Designer Armageddon Bug? Is it wrong to worry about such deliberate misinformation about an important event in our recent history that seems to suggest that public safety demands we stop those damn bloggers from killing Americans? Is it wrong to worry about the announcement of the Designer Armageddon Bug while they are tooling up their FEMA camps?
I don't know if it's wrong or not. You draw your own conclusions about what's happening here. But like the guy said, if you see a tidal wave rising in the distance, it isn't irresponsible to warn your fellow beachcombers before running away. It might piss off the globalists who want to depopulate that area of Indonesia so they can turn it into resorts, but pissing off globalists isn't against the law just yet.
But give them time and a few more movies like Contagion and it will be.
Share this:
"Where is the intersection between the world's deep hunger and your deep gladness?"