Demolition Access To The WTC Towers - Kevin Ryan

[Peter Lemkin]

He did express frustration with the 911 Truth movement. I am far more interested in the possibility that the outer columns and lattice do tend to shred the plane; what then is left to collide with and "remove" the fire protection on the steel load bearing inner core columns. I'd also guess that casting doubt on everything would tend to work more against the official explanation than any alternate, but possibly the subtleties are escaping me.

Posted elsewhere here on this Forum [and you can find it on the internet] is convincing evidence [to me] that the planes nor fires took of much of the fireproofing - and even IF it did, was NOT ever enough to bring down the building - the buildings, after being hit by computer-guided planes were brought down in true Hollywood style / DoD style Shock and Awe controlled demolition - computer timed detonations of nanothermite charges preplanted in the months before.

[Drew Phipps]

Posted elsewhere here on this Forum [and you can find it on the internet] is convincing evidence [to me] that the planes nor fires took of much of the fireproofing - and even IF it did, was NOT ever enough to bring down the building - the buildings, after being hit by computer-guided planes were brought down in true Hollywood style / DoD style Shock and Awe controlled demolition - computer timed detonations of nanothermite charges preplanted in the months before.

I guess you meant to put the word "neither" before the word "planes." I am not trying to argue about the cause of collapse. I am suggesting that the experiment might reveal another weakness in the government's official explanation.