9/11 North Tower Demolition - Wide Shot From The Northeast (With Slow Motion)

[Ed Jewett]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UGsUXbvB2...tube_gdata (3:11)

Extended With 1/4 Speed Slow Motion
Published on Jun 12, 2012 by IranContraScumDid911

[Peter Lemkin]

Shock and Awe - and done with pre-planted explosives. The planes were just to give an 'excuse'. On this video, one can see clearly the main central support columns give way [they couldn't possibly from heat - not even NIST wants anyone to believe that - the tower on top was sitting just over them and collapses first]; and the squibs a few floors below the EJECTED debris, as the explosions are timed to run down the building. I note the posters moniker is irancontrascumdidit - well, maybe a few were involved in both; but the forces that were behind both are the same, indeed. In fact, there seems to be only a single grouping that is behind most of the black operations and deep political shit we see. They use different groupings and entities to make things happen on X or Y, but all roads lead back to Rome [aburning].

[Jeffrey Orling]

I see something very different from Lemkin. He can't see any demolition explosion. What he thinks are demo explosions is the over pressure of the collapsing floors. destroying and forcing out the contents of each floor just AHEAD of the crush front. The collapse of a huge tower is very violent and involves lots of energy and chaos. What else would you expect?

The columns SURVIVED the floor collapse fell away AFTER the floor collapse stripped away the required bracing to hold them up... and without that bracing the columns toppled... the facade fell way and the core fell down... some of it toppling over. There is not a shred of evidence in ANY core or facade column found to indicate it was the victim of an explosion.

If Mr. Lemkin or any cite an image of an "exploded" column remains from the debris... by all means. There are thousands of those columns in the debris photos and all you need to do is find ONE which shows irrefutable signs of explosions. But of course Lemkin claims all the columns were exploded apart. All speculation. All based on his wishful thinking and poor observations... and lack of engineering and physics knowledge.

[Ed Jewett]

There is not a shred of evidence in ANY core or facade column found to indicate it was the victim of an explosion.

Much has been exposed with regard to the destruction of evidence, who was involved, how it was done, etc. Interesting how that was done, who coordinated it, how the process was kept from the eyes of the media, etc. But then that all has no bearing on the matter whatsoever, does it?

[Jeffrey Orling]

Ed,

The dog ate my homework.

The site was cleaned up. Some of the steel etc. was saved for study. Do you think it was practical to save 1.8 million tons of debris?

We do have hundreds if not thousands of photos of the steel... on the pile... before it was touched. Show me one piece of steel which has the unmistakable signs of explosive destruction... show me one piece that's melted on that pile.

The collapse, WOULD generate enormous quantity of heat from the friction of grinding and pulverizing all the materials. Mechanical destruction PRODUCES heat and it's possible that it could have been concentrated and produced the NASA infared data. Can you prove it wouldn't? Can you falsify the statement that the destruction of 90,000 tons of concrete from grinding and abrasion would not produce heat?

How do you explain the origin of the heat which drove the billowing clouds after all three collapses way up into the sky?

Explain it in scienfitic terms.

If you can't explain the process then you can't draw a conclusion. Enough of the black box and the dog ate my homework explanations.

If you can't explain it.. then get one of your experts to... because I haven't read anyone explain much of anything.

Inquiring Minds Want to Know.

Jeffrey

[Jeffrey Orling]

A poster at the 911 Free Forums recently wrote:

"....the beauty of producing information from data in the way it's being done here is the nuance and the intellectual integrity behind it, rather than aggressive, agenda driven evangelism. The key is the ability and the permission to be surprised and turned by your own research, regardless of political necessity. I've always found it it refreshing and delightful such a venue was around, and have never been more angered at its vile abusers."

But if you don't do research and work with data... it's all evangelism.... or if you don't at least accept that data drives the understanding of mechanism not political necessity... than you can at least have a open mind... something missing on both sides of the false dichotomy about what happened on 9/11.

An please Ed... don't tell me how full your 9/11 truth church pews are... parishioners are followers not leaders or free thinkers... And if you cite Lynn Margulis as a 911 Truth leader, please do tell what research she has done to shed light on the matter at hand. I mean no disrespect to Lynn as she's done some very impressive work in biology, but physics and engineering??? I think she's out of her depth there. Don't you?