I debated on whether to make this personal or take the question on in the abstract, and I chose the former. I have become a dropout, a walkaway, over a period of several years. My lifestyle in terms of receiving any media messaging, or participating in discussion on topics in the mainstream, is as close to nil as possible. Yes the final nail in the coffin was the period when Trump's candidacy began, but that is relatively beside the the point. If I were to try to construct a rationale for this approach, I suppose two main ideas rise to my mind. One is Einstein's definition of insanity in regard to our mainstream narratives. Two is the habituation towards Presidential politics in general. It may indeed be the case that a walkaway is shirking their duty as an activist citizen, by betraying these themes that have spanned the decades. But I suppose I would want to understand the nature, and importance, of placeholder, or cog, of which I have abandon

I imagine the idea is clear and I do not wish to waste your time trying to frilly it up. I will say that I still dedicate myself to the idea of being a change agent in the world, but in a manner and locale different than that of the mainstream. What exactly that 'other activity' actually is seems irrelevant in regard to the prioritizing of mainstream participation imo. The point is of course how we can be the most effective agents of the change we want to see. Arguing the same reactive memes over and over on a playing field where no one opinion has any leverage seems like the least attractive of the available options. So maybe I do have to justify one option over another, and I may concede that point. In the meantime, I guess I would just like to understand the position explained to me that I, or anyone, need to involve themselves in all of this. This is not a taunt, or an attempt to gain some philosophical high-ground, I genuinely want to understand what I might be missing.

This came out pretty well I think. The audio is really clear.

David Giglio's Our Hidden History is an important You Tube Channel. (Even better than Von Pein's :

Anyway take a listen:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HuXtmT_v...e=youtu.be

In an earlier post, I mentioned that I have brought a lawsuit against Library and Archives Canada because they denied access to me to certain files in the Louis M. Bloomfield collection. I'm not the first person to do so, Maurice Phillips sued them in 2006 and again in 2008. At the end of the 2008 case, the court ruled that the archives could impose a restriction on some files in the collection, and what they did was to impose a 50 year restriction on those files that they believed to be subject to solicitor-client privilege. When I began my research of the Bloomfield collection years ago, I would check an online document on the archives website that would indicate which files were now 50 years old. I would then order those files and review them. In 2018 the archives informed me that those files that had the 50 year restriction i.e. those files that they deemed to be subject to solicitor-client privilege could no longer be viewed by the public. Because of this action by the archives, I brought a lawsuit against them in the Federal Court of Canada. Since bringing my court action, a new problem has arose. La Barreau du Quebec aka The Law Society of Quebec, which is one of the of the largest law societies in Canada, has intervened in my case at the request of the archives. They are intervening in my case because they want to defend solicitor-client privilege, which protects communications between a lawyer and his client from being divulged. I have informed them that the files Bloomfield donated to the archives are not protected by solicitor-client privilege because the files he donated are not related to his legal work with clients, but they still have not withdrawn their intervention. A local media outlet has written a story about my lawsuit. The story also has a comment from Harry Bloomfield, who is Louis M. Bloomfield's nephew.

[URL="https://www.blacklocks.ca/lawyers-in-jfk-archive-case/"]
Tuesday, July 10, 2018[/URL]


[URL="https://www.blacklocks.ca/lawyers-in-jfk-archive-case/"]

Lawyers In JFK Archive Case[/URL]

One of Canada's largest law societies is intervening in a court case over archival records linked by conspiracy theorists to the 1963 Kennedy assassination. The Québec bar association said the challenge raises important questions affecting all solicitors and clients. "We are intervening on the principle of solicitor-client confidentiality," said Jean-Francois Del Torchio, director of communications for the Barreau du Québec. "That confidentiality doesn't belong to the lawyer; it always belongs to the client. We have the mandate from our board of directors to protect solicitor-client confidentiality." Library & Archives Canada in 1979 accepted a donation of 31 boxes of personal records from Louis Bloomfield, a Montréal attorney. Bloomfield from 1967 was named in unsubstantiated press reports as an agent for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency with knowledge of the JFK assassination. Bloomfield had asked that his records be released 20 years after his death; he died in 1984. However, archivists last February 21 told researchers the files would remain sealed forever since they contained confidential information. "On the advice of Department of Justice lawyers, Library & Archives Canada has closed in perpetuity records subject to client-solicitor privilege," said the agency. John Kowalski, an Ottawa researcher, is suing for release of the Bloomfield papers in Federal Court. In an interview, Kowalski disputed claims the papers must be kept confidential in perpetuity. "To be protected by privilege, you have to be giving legal advice to a client," said Kowalski. "The lawyer must be acting in their capacity as a lawyer. I've examined so many of these letters, and none of them involve legal advice not one iota. These are general letters to many different people about business matters." Researchers in 2006 won a Federal Court ruling Philipps v. Librarian & Archivist of Canada that there was no justification to withhold the files. Justice Simon Noël noted Bloomfield received tax credits for his donation under the Cultural Property Export And Import Act. "Once the term of 20 years is complete, the power of controlling access ends," wrote the Court. Harry Bloomfield of Montréal, nephew of the archives donor, said in an interview his family remains baffled by claims their uncle had any connection to the CIA or Kennedy shooting. "He tried to fathom why this was happening," said Bloomfield. "I see no reason why his files shouldn't be completely open," said Bloomfield. "I would like to get this whole conspiracy business cleared up, from the point of view of my late uncle. To say he would be involved in something like the Kennedy assassination is just grotesque, and if he were alive today I'm sure he would sue for defamation." Bloomfield described his uncle as an esteemed lawyer and WWII veteran who left his papers with the national archives because "he thought his career might be interesting" for researchers. By Jason Unrau

MMany have speculated LBJ behind the assassination but why didn't he run again in 68 ? There have been many theories but no definite answers to my knowledge ?

I found this in my Twitter feed, could be interesting.

Cynthia McKinney:

Quote:I am pleased to announce my acceptance of a position on the Board of Advisors of a new think tank: Center for Deep Political Research: A Think Tank for Truth. https://t.co/PFIX6wDAt6

Attached Files

Thumbnail(s)
   

https://www.bitchute.com/video/UuZRMpt_Tas/

Len Osanic and Jeff Carter conclude their fine series of Post Script to 1963 with Episode 9.

This is on the political impact of the four major assassinations of the sixties: JFK, Malcolm, MLK and RFK.

This is a very important issue that I do not think the critical community focuses on enough. That impact was both huge and permanent. And its with us today.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SqVo0Dxb...e=youtu.be

From the American Herald Tribune:

Quote:Dear President Trump,
As a military officer and also contractor for Booz Allen Hamilton, I was assigned to the Joint Interagency Operations Center at U.S. Central Command, where I identified, tracked, and reported on terrorists, their financial donors, networks, banks, and activities.
Part of my mission was to investigate, discover, and expose all acts of "waste, fraud, and abuse" by Terrorist Financing Operations Director Dov Zakheim who was my senior supervisor. It was known that Dov Zakheim had secretly arranged for $2.3 trillion dollars to be mis-appropriated through Pentagon channels when he had been the Pentagon Comptroller.
I was assigned the task of penetrating Dov Zakheim's terrorist financing operations, which involved his son Roger Zakheim (a lawyer at the House Armed Services Committee), an Iraqi named Abdullah Azziz (with close ties to Rudy Gulliani) and the law firm Covington and Burling.
The auditors investigating this matter were conveniently killed in a missile strike upon the Pentagon Office of Naval Intelligence on September 11, 2001. This missile strike was concealed as a "plane attack", which was a deception operation.
MORE...

• MUSLIMS WERE FRAMED FOR 9/11: FAKE NEWS MSM SILENCES US
  
• THE WAR ON TERROR: THE PLOT TO RULE THE MIDDLE EAST - A BOOK REVIEW
  
• THE RAMIFICATIONS OF THE POST-9-11 WAR ON TERROR
  
• FACING A MAJOR ATTACK ON ACADEMIC FREEDOM IN CANADA
  

I briefed your attorney Michael Cohen about these matters in 2015 and 2016which may be one of the reasons he has been targeted by Deep State Shadow Government loyalists.
Evidence and expert testimony confirm without a doubt that the attacks on September 11, 2001 against the Pentagon (as well as the World Trade Center and the Solomon Building in N.Y.) were a well-planned, well-financed, psychological operation a false flag attack on American soil designed to trigger and manipulate the American people, the Congress, and the U.S. Military into a full-scale war-mobilization posture with the intent of overthrowing, scattering, and re-making the Middle East and Africa for the direct political, cultural, and economic benefit of the Zionist state of Israel.
9/11, although seemingly coherent, has led to a multi-trillion dollar nightmare for Americans. Because of your success in attacking the Deep State with your sealed indictments and other measures, and because of the failure of the DNI-CIA-FBI-DOJ "Russian Hoax" as well as great fear that your forthcoming summit with President Vladimir Putin will be a great success, I fear for your life and pray for your safety.
You are our Chief Law Enforcement Officer, not just our Commander-in-Chief. It is my hope that this memorandum, combined with the other memoranda you are receiving from other informed patriots, will be helpful to you during the Helsinki summit, where I and many others hope that you and President Putin will share intelligence on 9/11 who did it, how they did it, why they did it face to face.
I believe that your leadership in placing the truth about 9/11 before the public will finish the job of taking down the Deep State and the Shadow Government it will help you shut down the pernicious Zionist/Saudi penetration and subversion of the US economy, government, and society and it will help you demonstrate to the larger public, most of whom did not vote for you, that under your leadership, the US Government can be trusted to clean house and tell the truth.
Very respectfully,
Scott Bennett

9/11


WRITER

SCOTT BENNETT

Scott Bennett, a U.S. Army Psychological Operations Officer, worked at U.S. Central Command's Joint Interagency Operations Center. Bennett was assigned to "Terrorist Threat Financing" and tasked with discovering terrorist financing networks (domestic and foreign), instruments, and bank accounts being used to fund Islamic terrorists, working with multiple U.S. and foreign military and government agencies. He also worked at U.S. Special Operations Command as the Liaison Officer at the State Department Coordinator for Counterterrorism Office, and prior to joining the Army, the Bush Administration from 2003-2008. He has also worked for Booz-Allen-Hamilton. He is the author of Shell Game: A Whistleblowing Report (CreateSpace, 2016). His website is: www.shellgamewhistleblower.com

I am working on a website that aims to create inventories of various individuals and resource, and it includes technology as one of it's categories. Therefore i am wondering if anyone has any recommendations of general technology critics of the last 100 years or so? Ivan Ilitch and Neil Postman certainly come to mind, and maybe Douglass Rushkoff for the modern day. Technology critics that have more of an economic slant on technology and mechanization, include Richard Wolff and Jeremy Rifkin. Any additional names would be appreciated. Thank you.

I would assume most here are aware of the Mineta testimony of an incoming flight headed towards the pentagon around 9:25. You will see posts that the 9/11 Commission report disputes this by saying Cheney did not even arrive at the PEOC until 9:58 What most people may not be aware of is the 9/11 Commission reports that all the details of the Mineta testimony do occur but that they occur around 10:10. So the orders Mineta hears Cheney giving at 9.25 are indeed confirmed by the Commission but they claim this occurs at approximately 10:10 and are based on an intelligence estimate that believes flight 93 is approaching Washington at this time. So the the orders regarding an incoming flight are about 93 instead of 77 I can't find it on the web , but i have read it in the 9/11 Commission report