|
On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics
|
16-09-2016, 09:10 PM
Scott Kaiser Wrote:If I can't beat'em, perhaps I should join'em? I've given you information [freely], and I still know information no one knows, and this isn't about me, but.... If you want my information, pay me ten million dollars.10 million? Gosh, Scott, that's a lotta pesos, señor. Hunt only asked Costner for 5 million? To which Kevin responded, "I can't talk to you anymore, St. John".
16-09-2016, 09:22 PM
Mark A. O'Blazney Wrote:Scott Kaiser Wrote:If I can't beat'em, perhaps I should join'em? I've given you information [freely], and I still know information no one knows, and this isn't about me, but.... If you want my information, pay me ten million dollars.10 million? Gosh, Scott, that's a lotta pesos, señor. Hunt only asked Costner for 5 million? To which Kevin responded, "I can't talk to you anymore, St. John". You hear me, but you're not listening, please don't compare me to others. I have something they don't, yes... Howard was a "bench-warmer" but, my father was a player. He turned on the CIA, and even Richard Poyle after finding out didn't want to have anything to do with my father, in the end, he wanted to do what was right, all I'm doing is finishing my father's work, and if people get sick of me bringing up my father. I don't give a shit, but I do have a suggestion, don't read it, problem solved right Dawn?
16-09-2016, 10:08 PM
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Tracy Riddle Wrote: Most importantly they pretend to ignore you but in reality they read everything you post.
17-09-2016, 04:19 AM
Some folks believe Kennedy could do no wrong, they themselves live a lie. Kennedy refused to provide air-cover when he himself promised air-cover, he then delayed the A4 Skyhawks until the Battle was over, Kennedy knew the battle was over before it was over while writing the Russians on D-Day two informing them there is nothing to worry about, he took public responsibility for the failure while privately claiming the CIA tried to force Kennedy into using American military, for years researchers, well respected researchers have lied, covering up the truth. You may believe what you want, and I certainly do not choose sides, I believe I've already proven that, but I will provide you with the cold hard truth. Lee Oswald didn't kill Jack, and if I were to just spit some names out you wouldn't believe me anyways, so why make the effort, it's been 50 plus years, perhaps, I should just walk away from all this and leave well enough alone, but I can't only because I plan on finishing my father's work.
The truth.... It will set me free!
17-09-2016, 08:11 AM
Scott Kaiser Wrote:Some folks believe Kennedy could do no wrong, they themselves live a lie. Kennedy refused to provide air-cover when he himself promised air-cover, he then delayed the A4 Skyhawks until the Battle was over, Kennedy knew the battle was over before it was over while writing the Russians on D-Day two informing them there is nothing to worry about, he took public responsibility for the failure while privately claiming the CIA tried to force Kennedy into using American military, for years researchers, well respected researchers have lied, covering up the truth. You may believe what you want, and I certainly do not choose sides, I believe I've already proven that, but I will provide you with the cold hard truth. Lee Oswald didn't kill Jack, and if I were to just spit some names out you wouldn't believe me anyways, so why make the effort, it's been 50 plus years, perhaps, I should just walk away from all this and leave well enough alone, but I can't only because I plan on finishing my father's work.Hey, Scott !!! You and Felipe Hemming oughta go 'mano-a-mano' again on Skype, but try not to talk over one another this time, that's very rude. There you can 'spit out' those 'names' to a much wider audience. Is that a good idea?
17-09-2016, 09:24 PM
Mark A. O'Blazney Wrote:[quote=Scott Kaiser]Some folks believe Kennedy could do no wrong, they themselves live a lie. Kennedy refused to provide air-cover when he himself promised air-cover, he then delayed the A4 Skyhawks until the Battle was over, Kennedy knew the battle was over before it was over while writing the Russians on D-Day two informing them there is nothing to worry about, he took public responsibility for the failure while privately claiming the CIA tried to force Kennedy into using American military, for years researchers, well respected researchers have lied, covering up the truth. You may believe what you want, and I certainly do not choose sides, I believe I've already proven that, but I will provide you with the cold hard truth. Lee Oswald didn't kill Jack, and if I were to just spit some names out you wouldn't believe me anyways, so why make the effort, it's been 50 plus years, perhaps, I should just walk away from all this and leave well enough alone, but I can't only because I plan on finishing my father's work.Hey, Scott !!! You and Felipe Hemming oughta go 'mano-a-mano' again on Skype, but try not to talk over one another this time, that's very rude. There you can 'spit out' those 'names' to a much wider audience. Is that a good idea?[/QUOTE That will never happen again, I don't need Hemming, Lorenz or Hunt to build a platform. They each have their own part in history, and my own mother knew Hemming was a fraud as do many of the anti-Castro's I've spoken too. The difference between the three I mentioned above and Ed Kaiser is this, Mr. Kaiser really was the " silent majority" has anyone ever heard him brag about anything he did or try to sell for a book, or sell a story for 60,000? So many folks are bilnded to the real truth that I've been trying to tell you why Kaiser tried to make right that which was wrong, why do you suppose he had those photos and not a chance to testify at the HSCA? Folks you've been pushing the wrong guy away while allowing these fakes to entertain you! It's a joke...
17-09-2016, 09:46 PM
Better yet, here's something for you to think about, my father tells the FBI that he was awaiting word from someone in the Watergate committee, no one knew it was Liebengood, however, my father is also showing off photographs around 1973, he was also interviewed by Liebengood in 1973, if those photos had anything to do with Watergate then why didn't my father use those photos as levage? Everyone knew those were photos taken of the men in Dallas the day Kennedy was assassinated why then if my father is testifying to Liebengood did he turn on Frank and not show Liebengood these photos if they were in reference to Watergate? Why didn't he live long enough to testify at the HSCA and submit those photos as evidence? After all he was already showing them around in Miami. The end....
17-09-2016, 10:02 PM
And, Liebengood was apart of a secret group in the renewed investigation of president Kennedy's assassination, certainly those photos could not get in the wrong hands, get the picture now?
18-09-2016, 04:35 PM
(This post was last modified: 19-09-2016, 04:52 AM by Scott Kaiser.)
Could anyone who's not working for the company forge a passport and not see 10 years in prison? Do you even know how many forged passports the company gave to individuals working for them?
If Ed Kaiser wasn't apart of the company, just how then did he get off with a slap on the wrist and released without charge when the company brought him back from Israel? It is true, he was a recruited [asset,] but he also worked his way into the target area by using false credentials in order to roam freely. He did the same at U.S. Customs where he would steal 188 pink index cards revealing some of the hardest criminals and those involved in the Miami Mafia. How did Ed Kaiser infiltrate the Mafia in Miami, the anti-Castro Cuban groups, the FBI, CIA and U.S. Customs. No one I know has done what Kaiser's done, and stumbles across photos of the men involved in Kennedy's assassination. Kaiser turned on Frank Sturgis, the five page letter my father wrote although it's not dated was written in 1973 sometime, when he says, "I have the deepest respect for; among them, Frank Fiorini. We have spent many hours, days, weeks and months together for the same cause." That respect changed after discovering the photos, Kaiser turned on Sturgis informing Liebengood about a plot to assassinate Nixon at the VVAW this was in 1973. They already got Orlando Bosch released, my father backed out of assassinating Nixon, and there was a 25 car caravan that approached Nixon's house in Key Biscayne where they were planning on firing a Styx missile or bazooka into Nixon's house had Nixon not do something about Cuba. Just as soon as Nixon stopped paying out their demands during Watergate, Nixon became a target for assassination at the VVAW Convention in Miami Beach, my father did back out, he wasn't going to get involved in another political hit after finding out from Sturgis this was just another political assassination that was politically motivated. My father did that once threatening Nixon on the steps of the Lincoln Memorial, Bosch was released, and Kaiser would not get involved in a second or third attempt to assassinate Nixon. So, what does Kaiser do? He starts to show folks around in Miami the photos of the men involved in Dallas TX. the day president Kennedy was assassinated, in-fact, he shows these photos to the wrong guy. Richard Poyle who was in Mexico on November 21, 1963 seen the photos Kaiser had, now, Richard doesn't want anything to do with Kaiser on any future activity. By now, those who were involved knew Kaiser had these photos, it was just a matter of time. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
