On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics

[Scott Kaiser]

I think that move was done backwards and Scott's Kaiser material is still in the Prayer man thread.

I fixed that. Thanks.

What happened to my post I made before the Tafficante statement? The point I was trying to make, if all my posts gets deleted to only but a few select for view then what happens when folks begin to judge, will they be judging me fairly?

[Scott Kaiser]

I don't know how anyone else feels about it, but, if I'm going to be censored, posts deleted, my words selected and publish what only fits what you feel should be seen, then how can I prove my case if no one is reading everything I'm saying? If I have not disrespected anyone or insulted another's work how then can only half of what I'm saying only being seen by the public? Is that fair?

Please tell me if this is how it will be carried out and I will do you the favor of not posting here anymore. If I'm wrong, please inform.

[Scott Kaiser]

Edit: Scott I'll try to read your book if you get a good editor and state your case understandably.

Albert, I don't have a book out yet, that first one, isn't mine, they took out what information they wanted to take out, (sounds familiar?) Read post #76 above, and they put in information they wanted to put in, that's not my book. My book is being looked at, fact checked I'm sure, and when it becomes available, you'll know.

[Scott Kaiser]

[Scott Kaiser's response to Albert Doyle's post has been moved to the Edwin Kaiser thread. If you wish to pursue this Scott's notion of who Prayer Man/Woman is, I encourage you to go to that thread. Cheers.]

What was moved is NOT a true and accurate post I made.

[Lauren Johnson]

[Scott Kaiser's response to Albert Doyle's post has been moved to the Edwin Kaiser thread. If you wish to pursue this Scott's notion of who Prayer Man/Woman is, I encourage you to go to that thread. Cheers.]

What was moved is NOT a true and accurate post I made.

Sorry Scott. You are correct. I don't know why I screwed up. I apologize. You will have to try to replicate your post.

[Scott Kaiser]

[Scott Kaiser's response to Albert Doyle's post has been moved to the Edwin Kaiser thread. If you wish to pursue this Scott's notion of who Prayer Man/Woman is, I encourage you to go to that thread. Cheers.]

What was moved is NOT a true and accurate post I made.

Sorry Scott. You are correct. I don't know why I screwed up. I apologize. You will have to try to replicate your post.

[Scott Kaiser's response to Albert Doyle's post has been moved to the Edwin Kaiser thread. If you wish to pursue this Scott's notion of who Prayer Man/Woman is, I encourage you to go to that thread. Cheers.]

1.) For the record, first, I made no such notion, accusation or imply anything as to who this "Prayer Man" is.
2.) My posts was deliberately deleted without just cause.
3.) My posts are starting to become edited without just cause, no disrespect, no insults, nothing.
4.) Sorry doesn't quit cut it when I'm giving you information right from my heart and then you expect me to just say it again when I shouldn't have to?
5.) I wonder sometimes, just how important you really believe the information I'm freely giving you is? Perhaps, when you find out you'll continue to apologize? Well, I'm not looking for apologizes when I'm sharing valuable information, or is it because it's valuable information never before made public you prefer to keep it that way? Whichever the case, my father will have his justice. And, the truth will free me.

[Lauren Johnson]

[Scott Kaiser's response to Albert Doyle's post has been moved to the Edwin Kaiser thread. If you wish to pursue this Scott's notion of who Prayer Man/Woman is, I encourage you to go to that thread. Cheers.]

What was moved is NOT a true and accurate post I made.

Sorry Scott. You are correct. I don't know why I screwed up. I apologize. You will have to try to replicate your post.

[Scott Kaiser's response to Albert Doyle's post has been moved to the Edwin Kaiser thread. If you wish to pursue this Scott's notion of who Prayer Man/Woman is, I encourage you to go to that thread. Cheers.]

1.) For the record, first, I made no such notion, accusation or imply anything as to who this "Prayer Man" is.
2.) My posts was deliberately deleted without just cause.
3.) My posts are starting to become edited without just cause, no disrespect, no insults, nothing.
4.) Sorry doesn't quit cut it when I'm giving you information right from my heart and then you expect me to just say it again when I shouldn't have to?
5.) I wonder sometimes, just how important you really believe the information I'm freely giving you is? Perhaps, when you find out you'll continue to apologize? Well, I'm not looking for apologizes when I'm sharing valuable information, or is it because it's valuable information never before made public you prefer to keep it that way? Whichever the case, my father will have his justice. And, the truth will free me.

I am no longer editing nor deleting your posts. I am moving your posts here. Period. I messed up on this last post on Poyle. If it's that important to you, retype it. And "sorry" is all you get. And I am not interested in the information you give me. But some other people might be interested. So I suggest that you get busy with your cause and forget about me.

[Scott Kaiser]

What was moved is NOT a true and accurate post I made.

Sorry Scott. You are correct. I don't know why I screwed up. I apologize. You will have to try to replicate your post.

[Scott Kaiser's response to Albert Doyle's post has been moved to the Edwin Kaiser thread. If you wish to pursue this Scott's notion of who Prayer Man/Woman is, I encourage you to go to that thread. Cheers.]

1.) For the record, first, I made no such notion, accusation or imply anything as to who this "Prayer Man" is.
2.) My posts was deliberately deleted without just cause.
3.) My posts are starting to become edited without just cause, no disrespect, no insults, nothing.
4.) Sorry doesn't quit cut it when I'm giving you information right from my heart and then you expect me to just say it again when I shouldn't have to?
5.) I wonder sometimes, just how important you really believe the information I'm freely giving you is? Perhaps, when you find out you'll continue to apologize? Well, I'm not looking for apologizes when I'm sharing valuable information, or is it because it's valuable information never before made public you prefer to keep it that way? Whichever the case, my father will have his justice. And, the truth will free me.

I am no longer editing nor deleting your posts. I am moving your posts here. Period. I messed up on this last post on Poyle. If it's that important to you, retype it. And "sorry" is all you get. And I am not interested in the information you give me. But some other people might be interested. So I suggest that you get busy with your cause and forget about me.

A true apologize is, I'm very sorry if you think this is about you or me, because, it's not. The point you're overlooking for some reason is the information I'm freely giving you, and if you weren't interested in the information I'm publishing, you wouldn't be touching it at all, isn't that a lie Mr. Johnson?

You are right about one thing though, it really is THAT important to me, to point out those who killed my father, and why. Tell me sir, wouldn't it be that important to you too, or ANYONE on this board, to know who killed your father? Or, is it that some folks here just don't have a heart and all this JFK talk is just that, talk.

[Scott Kaiser]

Lastly Mr. Johnson, in all my ranting and raving not once did I mention Poyle, (YOU) did, why is that Mr. Johnson? I don't play games, I will give you and anyone who wants to hear the information freely, truthfully, but not like this sir. Do have a good evening, perhaps, you should let go, and let God!

Good evening to you sir.

[Scott Kaiser]

That's okay Mr. Johnson, I'm sure someday, you'll redeem yourself, and also remove your ridiculous post you put up at the Prayer Man thread about me, that is how rumors and lies get started you know.

Here's something you may want to share, when I was in Dallas sometime back I thought, what if someone could take a surveying measurement and determine the exact measurement in degrees from the head shot from the point of impact to the sixth floor window without ever having to physically be looking out the sixth floor window.

I thought, well, what if from where the mark in the street, marks the spot of being the fatal head shot, what would surveyor equipment prove? For starters, it proved the shot was traveling at 41o, meaning, it would be virtually impossible for the right side of Kennedy's head to explode when science, math, including a piece of surveying equipment would prove that Kennedy's [align=left] side of his head should have exploded instead, and to think that something so simple was used to measure, align and produce accurate measurements.

Using this method surely would exonerate Lee H. Oswald proving the fatal shot came from somewhere other than the rear, would you be interested in hearing something like this instead Mr. Johnson?