On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics

[Scott Kaiser]

If you ask me this form and or any form needs some sense of humor or it will get boring very fast by the way I have no problem trolling myself after all, you're still going to read it. LMAO!

Your post is hilarious and I bet you don't even know why. ::

You're right I don't but that's the beauty of humor.

[Scott Kaiser]

Sorry Mr Doyle, but what I see is an image that has an appearance of shade reconstruction, and if not previously recognizable, I cannot see how changing the shading of the image has any real value. But, again I repeat my opinion that there is no PrayerMan, and indeed the image could be labeled PrayerWoman, based on the existing film, along with testimony by known area occupants at the time, as well as some situational film and/or photos of the area some minutes after the shooting of JFK and JBC. So, regarding the PrayerPerson evidence, we still tend to disagree. Don't you agree?

You mean does he agree to disagree?

https://youtu.be/g5j8Jioan1w

I do not recall posting this subject matter on this thread, and as Mr Kaiser asked a relative question, I do wonder, as I wander, if, and if so, why was this conversation inserted in this thread? As I make an effort to be polite on my posts, and respectful to others, as well as the subject matter, I request the same respect be afforded me on this public forum. And if my name is associated with a discussion, I believe I am entitled to said respect and an explanation as to why any post by me, directly or indirectly, is moved from one area to another. If Mr Kaiser's reply was for some reason unknown by me inappropriate, why not just delete it? Whether or not anyone agrees and/or disagrees with Mr Doyle's and my somewhat opposing viewpoint about the PP identity, our quoted conversation does not, and should not, in my opinion, belong here.

Never in my life have I seen a group of grumpy old men act like a bunch of babies, ya'll must have hit middle-aged LOL

That makes me wonder as I wander if so, so I don't know, but so what?

[Tracy Riddle]

I happen to have a well-developed sense of humor, and this thread often reminds me of some of the great absurdist comedians.

[Lauren Johnson]

[LR Trotter]

Sorry Mr Doyle, but what I see is an image that has an appearance of shade reconstruction, and if not previously recognizable, I cannot see how changing the shading of the image has any real value. But, again I repeat my opinion that there is no PrayerMan, and indeed the image could be labeled PrayerWoman, based on the existing film, along with testimony by known area occupants at the time, as well as some situational film and/or photos of the area some minutes after the shooting of JFK and JBC. So, regarding the PrayerPerson evidence, we still tend to disagree. Don't you agree?

You mean does he agree to disagree?

https://youtu.be/g5j8Jioan1w

I do not recall posting this subject matter on this thread, and as Mr Kaiser asked a relative question, I do wonder, as I wander, if, and if so, why was this conversation inserted in this thread? As I make an effort to be polite on my posts, and respectful to others, as well as the subject matter, I request the same respect be afforded me on this public forum. And if my name is associated with a discussion, I believe I am entitled to said respect and an explanation as to why any post by me, directly or indirectly, is moved from one area to another. If Mr Kaiser's reply was for some reason unknown by me inappropriate, why not just delete it? Whether or not anyone agrees and/or disagrees with Mr Doyle's and my somewhat opposing viewpoint about the PP identity, our quoted conversation does not, and should not, in my opinion, belong here.

Mr Trotter, Scott Kaiser is getting "special treatment" due to his well deserved repition for trolling. I am moving most of his posts to this thread so that if he trolls, he is trolling himself.

OTOH, due to his sources he can at times make contributions. If you want to respond to Scott, this is the thread where it will happen. Cheers.

Once again, the moved post was a not sought reply by Mr Kaiser regarding a conversation between Mr Doyle and myself that has been inserted into a non-relative thread. And, all things considered, I fail to see the justification as it relates to the post that has been moved. As noted, the reply in question was not worth any additional response by myself, and I will let Mr Doyle express his comments as he wishes. But, I do believe in all fairness, any moved and/or moderated posting should be duly noted.

[Lauren Johnson]

But, I do believe in all fairness, any moved and/or moderated posting should be duly noted.

Good point. I can do that.

[LR Trotter]

But, I do believe in all fairness, any moved and/or moderated posting should be duly noted.

Good point. I can do that.

​Thank you!

[Scott Kaiser]

https://youtu.be/G41V48C-N14

[LR Trotter]

https://youtu.be/G41V48C-N14

Our elected US President was murdered in cold blood, and that is not one damned bit humorous. Not at all!

[Lauren Johnson]

https://youtu.be/G41V48C-N14

Our elected US President was murdered in cold blood, and that is not one damned bit humorous. Not at all!

The decision by the Mods was that Scott spent a lot of time trolling other threads but was also capable to contribute. The decision was to put up with his bullshit. I would have voted him off the island if we had voted.

Mr. Trotter, my counsel is to ask Scott specific questions concerning his area of knowledge or just stay out of this thread.

I agree it's not funny -- not at all. But Scott can troll all he wants in this thread. And in theory he's all about researching and honoring his father.

Cheers.