Posts: 3,973
Threads: 482
Likes Received: 3 in 3 posts
Likes Given: 2
Joined: Dec 2009
10-12-2016, 01:31 AM
(This post was last modified: 10-12-2016, 02:21 AM by Lauren Johnson.)
Scott Kaiser's book is out: Edwin Kaiser's Covert Life: And His Little Black Book Linking Cuba, Watergate & the JFK Assassination
From Michael Best
UPDATE: This is the TrineDay version. Scott's update is not out. I know Scott was very unhappy with what Trine Day did to his book
Quote:-
![[Image: encbotOJ_bigger.jpg]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/697638028349743108/encbotOJ_bigger.jpg) Michael Best â€@NatSecGeek 1h1 hour ago
I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt, but his explanation was full of holes, lies and plagiarism admissions, so... *shrugs*
1 reply0 retweets0 likes
Reply
-
and MB's review on Amazon.
Quote:The original book was mostly copy and pasted from Wikipedia articles. The rest was based off of rumors and interviews and documents that Scott Kaiser said he would make public, but never did. The only person he seems to have actually shared them with is Roger Stone. Beyond that, he has tried to take credit for other people's FOIA releases as his own work - despite the clear documentation proving that the files were neither requested by him nor released to him. At the same time, he tried to claim ownership of public documents (government documents are public domain) as "[his] work." The files that he has posted publicly are incomplete, cherry picked versions of documents that leave out Edwin Kaiser's documented history of lying, his being kicked out of the military, and then impersonating a military officer in order to steal from the government.
Given that, it's hard to take the book's author seriously - or any his claims.
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
Posts: 830
Threads: 135
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Oct 2010
Maybe several hundred more posts from Scott at the site there will change Michael's mind.
Posts: 335
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jul 2015
Trine Day = Fake News.
Right, Judyth?
Isn't there a law against this? Should there be?
That boiler room should be shut down, or at least explode.
How many other publishing houses are there like that? Even the ones that don't use paper.
Posts: 17,312
Threads: 3,465
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 2
Joined: Sep 2008
Actually Trine Day have published some very good books. Books that never got a look in elsewhere. However, some of the very good authors are unhappy that Judith has lowered the tone and also been published there. They feel that this will reflect poorly on their work and they have not chosen to publish with Trine for their recent books.
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx
"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.
“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
10-12-2016, 03:58 PM
(This post was last modified: 11-12-2016, 04:35 PM by Scott Kaiser.)
Still… All talk by Mr. Best, and I use that word, [best] lightly, and no proof. So what if I copied a few words and cited the source? Big deal! Best has tried his best at lying, manipulating, even said he was familiar with a plot he never heard of then to cover his tracks he goes to the MMF foundation and types in how the FBI misspelled my father's name to look up the documents. He's a shyster, huckster, a liar, manipulator and a hustler.
Rather than "admitting" he was never familiar with the plot, he looks for evidence which he doesn't have and every excuse to cover up his bullshit. (Yeah,) he's mad because I caught him red handed stealing the Liebengood documents [I produced], then he gets upset trying to burn me, I really enjoyed his little game, but, in the end, I did give him an opportunity to back out which he elected not to. I admitted to his little game of plagiarizing and he ran with it, does he think he's the only one who looked at the manuscript before it was ever released? If he would have remembered, the information was cited. What I used out of Wikipedia I also cited the source, but, Mr. Best won't tell you that if he won't admit to covering up his own lies about a plot he never heard of.
So, he goes on, and on, and on about nothing that never existed, he uses words like plagiarize and plagiarize because that's all he's got, he can't even offer up any proof for Christ sake and yet, he's still able to have a few band of followers join in on his crusade. I know, sad, but true. I only know them by haters, after all, these are the folks who wished they lived a life I did, right Best?
For some reason he can't prove I [FONT=&]plagiarized without also adding that I mentioned the source, and anyone who knows me knows I would. But! I can prove he steals others work, documents he'll call public and call me out publicly for your amusement, AND he doesn't acknowledge where or who discovered the information, he would rather steal it! He tries to pass it off as his own work, and yet he's able to convince a few folks he's right? Boy, my father always told me to watch out for fast talkers like that, and he really was able to sucker in a few.[/FONT]
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Now I remember why I never liked the guy, I suppose it's because I can be gullible, but he, like others I mentioned before offered up his services, (this IS the very reason I left information out). My mother would always say trust no one, now I remember why I don't like him, he's two faced, he'll tell you things you want to hear and tries his BEST to discredit you, well, if that's all he's got, I feel for those who follow him.
He's got NOTHING!
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
Now, can anyone take the moment and reflect on what both parties have said? Sit back, and (YOU) determine who's really telling the truth? You see, the reason I will always say I don't lose, is because truth will prevail, may be not then or now, but, it will come out. Go ahead, read what he says, then, read the truth.
Posts: 2,430
Threads: 124
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Jan 2011
What's been said, that right there alone should tell you something, I don't hide out, I don't ignore people good or bad. I don't have any excuses like Best, I will always answer anyone, and it's because of that, that some folks feel the need to judge me and call me out. All I care about is the end result, <period>.
Posts: 5,375
Threads: 149
Likes Received: 0 in 0 posts
Likes Given: 0
Joined: Sep 2010
Seems like Scott does have some credible insider information, background, and experiences that deserve better than what MB has reduced them to.
To me Scott needs some serious help in determining his evidence and how to best present it. I think part of the problem is the good evidence he does have hasn't been coherently presented. Mr MB may be putting personal grudge before objective consideration.
|
