On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics

[Scott Kaiser]

While your research is obviously a historical treasure chest and valuable in itself the thing I have always found most interesting about it is your personal journey to find out about your father. Listening for echoes of him as told through his friends and fellow soldiers of fortune. Your desire to give honor and life and purpose to your father in some way by this dialogue we watch on which transcends time and place and life and death. In the midst of some quite gruesome carnage it is quite touching and a loving tribute from a son.

Magda,

The only reason I signed back unto this forum for now is to say your words have touched me deeply, and more so as the time of his anniversary approaches.

If it's okay with you I would like to use your words and rearrange them to fit my update. I could not say what you said any better which exemplifies how words can come from the heart, thank you Magda.

I do promise to deliver what I say I will, extraordinary claims do require extraordinary proof, I will find away to provide all that I say, however, this will not stop anyone from continuing in their own quest for fable stories and unrealistic theories, as for others, the show must go on.

Scott Kaiser

P.S. Because no one can discredit me, nor can my evidence be ignored and I feel you are a genuine person I will make sure you get the first of the printed books from me. I want to tell the whole story now that I know how this works, I'll be holding nothing back.

[Magda Hassan]

Of course Scott. Carry on!

[Scott Kaiser]

Of course Scott. Carry on!

Thanks Magda,

In this short story, I just want everyone to know it's just not a story, but a story that can be proven. Now, whether folks want to believe it or not that's on them. Some folks privately and publicly asked why I have the attitude that I have letting me know that I'll get nowhere with the way I am, and as I've said before, when I discuss Watergate or Kennedy's assassination I have no friends, and truthfully, I'm not looking to get anywhere, I don't want someone to pay me millions bucks because I have indisputable material.

I don't want a pat on the back, I don't need to be recognized as a top researcher, I don't care about any of that crap, life is too short to think about clawing my way to the top over this bullshit, all I ever wanted is for my father to be rightfully recognized for his work and what he died for, and the truth shall set me free, everything else is just meaningless to me. (Perhaps, it's a reason I never really discussed much about anything else unless it was to prove someone wrong or provide them with information?) In my short story below holds more information then what some folks are able to pick up on or what I'm saying. They will not receive the entire message only because they're to defensive in wanting to find away to discredit me. And, that's okay, I welcome that.

In order to corroborate Rudy's story and what he was telling me I did another FOIA request. I asked the United States Justice Department and the FBI for any information they had on Edwin B. Kaiser aka the "Black Legion" and what I received and discovered on these documents was information about the ship my father was assassinated on, and how the ship ended up changing owners over and over before it ended up in the Cayman Islands as its final resting place.

The CIA needed to cover their tracks. The ship was registered in the Cayman Islands on May 2, 1977, just three months after my father's assassination aboard that ship. And, on May 7, 1977 exactly three months after Edwin Kaiser's death, Frank Sturgis said, In an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, "that the objective of the Watergate break-ins was to locate and destroy the photographs of our role in the assassination of the President."

AND, the TRUTH shall set ME FREE!

[Scott Kaiser]

Oh, and in-case I didn't mention it above, my father was killed on February 7, 1977. Everything else that followed above was to cover up my father's murder and why he was murdered.

[Albert Doyle]

on May 7, 1977 exactly three months after Edwin Kaiser's death, Frank Sturgis said, In an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, "that the objective of the Watergate break-ins was to locate and destroy the photographs of our role in the assassination of the President."

AND, the TRUTH shall set ME FREE!

Interesting.

[Scott Kaiser]

Food for thought, and getting this off my chest I have to ask, why didn't Frank ever mention the photographs anytime during Watergate or when Sturgis told Andrew St. George what he said while in prison, why didn't Frank ever mention the photos anytime after getting out of prison because of Watergate, better yet, why didn't Frank ever give that story to anyone who ever interviewed Frank about Watergate?

But, I believe I saved the best question for last, and that is, why did Frank expose the photographs in 1977, several years after Watergate, and exactly three months AFTER my father's death?

I'll be the first to tell you that Frank didn't shoot at the president, I know Frank, and he would have never been anywhere near the scene where he could have gotten caught, but did Frank deliver any weapons? That he did do. Could a guy like Barnard Baker pose as Secret Service, yes, and my father had his photo too along with David Morales. These are the facts, and they all along with a total of (14) other men were involved, and I do believe William Pawley did invest in Kennedy's assassination. I do believe what my father said on paper.

This assassination didn't have to come from the highest levels of government, and I'm willing to challenge anyone who says otherwise. LBJ orchestrated a cover up and that's true, but it didn't come from the highest levels of government as so many folks want to believe, you only have to understand that the Warren Commission was set in place rather than having any Congressional Hearings at that time to prevent a world war from breaking out with Russia.

Having the WC in place was to avoid a world war over the assassination, (that's it, nothing more then that,) and although there was a Congressional Hearing that later took place, it still couldn't trump the WCs Report.

In my update, I will shatter the WC. I will aside with the HSCA's findings of a "possible conspiracy," and I will fully expose both Watergate and Kennedy's assassination this year. And, I will NOT ask anyone to look at my PDF to prevent further treasure chest robbers and thieves like Micheal Best who does steal other folks FOIA documents for the sole purpose of his own recognition.

I for one wouldn't have cared as you could very well see by the opening remarks I made at his sight had he just asked to use my material or at the very least say something nice about my father, after all, he doesn't even know my father, but he says it would've be hard to believe what my father said in those documents had it not been for someone else's corroboration? Who is he to judge?

And, to those who have absolutely no interest in my father's story and made that clear like Dawn and others, please, do me a favor, and do not get my update, this material is not for you.

[Scott Kaiser]

One last thing, if we're not talking JFK or Watergate, to all my friends out there, I will be having a Superbowl party at my house, and I predict New England vs Dallas Cowboys so long as we're not talking JFK and Watergate, we're cool.


Scott Kaiser

[Albert Doyle]

Bernard "Barker"

[Scott Kaiser]

Bernard "Barker"

Yeah, that guy, you obviously knew who I was talking about right?

I don't suppose I'm discredited because I misspelled his name am I?

[Tracy Riddle]

And, on May 7, 1977 exactly three months after Edwin Kaiser's death, Frank Sturgis said, In an interview with the San Francisco Chronicle, "that the objective of the Watergate break-ins was to locate and destroy the photographs of our role in the assassination of the President."

AND, the TRUTH shall set ME FREE!

Would you please post a link to that article or a scan of it you have a copy?I find it very hard to believe that Sturgis said something like that in a major newspaper interview. And I would have read about it long ago.