On Edwin Kaiser and Related Topics

[Scott Kaiser]

not a single person had ever come forward and said the real reason for Watergate was to re-capture Cuba why do you suppose no one ever did?

It's like saying, or not saying the real reason we assassinated Jack was to re-capture Cuba, so.... All you'll get is bullshit stories!

[Mark A. O'Blazney]

not a single person had ever come forward and said the real reason for Watergate was to re-capture Cuba why do you suppose no one ever did?

It's like saying, or not saying the real reason we assassinated Jack was to re-capture Cuba, so.... All you'll get is bullshit stories!

Gosh, Scott…… I noticed that your pals St. John and Roger have 'teamed up' and done written a book about the Bush Crime Family.

I remember a picture you showed once when you had a Facebook page with the three of you together. I think I called it 'The Three Amigos', or some such thing.

Perhaps the three of you can join together again and get something going with your sad saga. You can start writing the screenplay for the movie now, you know,

little sketches, etc. Just a suggestion.

[Scott Kaiser]

Mark says; Perhaps the three of you can join together again and get something going with your sad saga.

See what I mean? You don't know what sad is, I doubt you ever seen your father about to kill your mother. It's kinda funny because there is or should be a cliche that says, no matter what your parents did in life, a child will always love his or hers parent, just because.

If we could all live with a heart of a child right?

I have given everyone real, true information regarding my father, Jack and Watergate, people will always want to believe what they want to believe. I will tell you this, of all the stories about Howard Hunt, Frank Sturgis, and even in the files of James McCord not a single person knew about Edwin Kaiser, well, except for Weberman who has done his homework, but no one, and I mean no one heard of my father, and had I not come forward after finding my father's information, no one would have known about him and another side to the story.

Perhaps, people really do judge harshly, perhaps, I am to gullible, and perhaps, my mother was right, I should have left best alone!

[Scott Kaiser]

Remember, I keep reiterating (14) men, do not forget this number. Some were powerful while others were not. You cannot implicate someone who has no power without implicating those who do. Overtime, they all had to go, and die they did whether it was before they were called to testify at the Warren Commission which wouldn't have happened anyways, not if their names are kept quite, but then there was the HSCA and Congress was getting involved instead of a hand full of men that made up a committee. Now, the country was getting involved, there could be nothing left for chance. And so, whether they were planning to testify before the Warren Commission, or go before the HSCA it couldn't happen. Though the company may not have been directly involved, they were nonetheless accomplices of the facts, or.... They wouldn't have created Oswald's fake photos in Mexico and turn them in, and help exfiltrate these men from Dallas.

You see, some of these men held great power and influence within while others did not, but nonetheless they ALL had to go. In other words, have you not heard of the old cliche mon ami? "You scratch my back, and I'll scratch yours."

All the other inquires were nothing more than a show, like some of the lawyer's that put on a mock drama courtroom style hearing played out for Oswald. There's no need in selling any charades when the public who has not study any part knows the truth without evidence presented, but how can that be mon ami when some folks have presented evidence and no one believes?

[Scott Kaiser]

You see, some of these men held great power and influence within while others did not, but nonetheless they ALL had to go. In other words, have you not heard of the old cliche mon ami? "You scratch my back, and I'll scratch yours."

The killing of that president, the assassination of that president, why was the president assassinated, killing Kennedy. Jack, Jack ,Jack. Assassination forums, who, what & why? We want to know, what really happened.


1.) No! You don't want to know, you only want to drag this on as the best murder mystery ever to be unsolved, but! That is not true mon ami.

2.) Was it because of JFK? No, it was for the country.

3.) Was it about JFK? No! It was about the country, not the man, and here is where many get confused.

4.) Was it for or about Cuba? No, some of the men who were involved were not Cubans, it had nothing to do with Cuba, but it did have everything to do with who was running that country.

5.) Was it because of commusium? Yes, communist is what reared its head 90 miles off the coast of the United States as [they,] Communist Cubans who were called G-2 & Russians called KGB alike infiltrated the United States, this had nothing to do with JFK not even JFK could build a wall to keep them out, so... Some men took matters into their own hands, it's not like the CIA wasn't fully aware of what was going on, and, if they couldn't get to Castro they would get to Kennedy for the country. It was the only way they thought of having a chance at getting to Castro, but it didn't work, the plan was perfect, and the men were well trained. LBJ just didn't want to antagonize WWIII, not that LBJ was unwilling to go to war with Cuba which could've been annihilated, Russia could not, therefore considering the facts, was it not better to lose one man, than for a whole nation to perish?

LBJ did the unthinkable in the eyes of American citizens, he formed the Warren Commission rather than going to Congress and had the assassination of Kennedy covered up. LMAO! (laugh my a$$ off.) And, he (LBJ) got away with it, of course Congress would later play along to appease the public, so they formed the HSCA, another joke, nothing got done other than a waste of taxpayers money, and in the end, they were able to weed out who else had or knew ANYTHING about that president who got wasted, who refused to eradicate communism... He just couldn't do it, no.... He wanted to pretend that he and Castro could live side by side... LMAO! BS! So, anyone who knew anything or had information about November 22, 1963 like (photos,) and [BEFORE] they could testify at the HSCA, what happened to them? Oh yeah, they too were killed, nowadays, everyone and anyone posting theories along with all the BS that's out there now it really is nothing more than that an allusion, "SMOKE & MIRRORS" they WON!

Nixon was the architect of the BOP, but no one really knew why Watergate happened, and I mean (no one) no one I know of except those who were involved, it's like the kidnapping of Juan Manuel Fangio, only a few knew and this is where all the speculation comes in. It's like speculating, about a sixth burglar, everyone heard about him, and everyone knew there were more than five burglars involved in Watergate, but NO ONE COULD FIND THE SIXTH, he was never caught, no one knew his position, what he did, or who he was... Am I right mon ami?

Please, share your thoughts! Thank you mon ami.

[Scott Kaiser]

"[They] knew that the Monroe Doctrine made by President Monroe, which was made to protect the Americans, North, South and central from infiltration from other government foreign and abroad was not Kennedy."

-I am quoting the writings of the greatest patriot that ever lived.

Have a good day mon ami....

[Scott Kaiser]

Scott, this is a thread on the new releases. Please keep to that subject. Other subjects / theories / musings go on your threads. Thanks.

I am sorry, I am now just reading this, you of all people do not understand, what I am giving you mon ami, is new releases, however, I am sure you will not understand, and feel bit how do you say, dazed and confused? I bid you good day monsieur.

[Scott Kaiser]

I do apologize mon ami, it must have slipped my little gray cells, I did not respond properly to your statement, and therefore that would only make me unquestionable rude. You said, "Other subjects / theories / musings go on your threads. Thanks." You may stick them wherever you like monsieur.

[Scott Kaiser]

I'm sorry Peter that I have destroyed many stories, why do you go on to say my information is theories? When I have already proven them to be otherwise? You don't want to know the truth, you want theories right? Stories to create other stories, so you think that by dumping my information here is where it belongs, because (you) think so. If true, then why has NO one ever discredited me? Why are there more than 300 downloads of my PDF that I had to remove before everyone starts to write more BS without understanding.

I'm truly sorry that a nobody like me was never heard of by any researcher many, many years ago, and I'm sorry I didn't disclose my father much sooner in time, but please understand, that's because my mother had her reasons. Don't hate the player, hate the game, ask yourself, what are you really in this for, what is it that made ANY of you really want to research Watergate or the assassination, for you, or something else? You see.... I can answer a question so simple a question without hesitation, and that's because this hits home for me. However, I would LOVE to understand why you??? For many of you...

You see, the truth does hurt, doesn't it?

[Tom Scully]

RE: Rorke



Sometime after the birth of their second child in 1955,



....the Rorkes moved to 7 West 96th St. in Manhattan, NY and that address was still reported ( 124-90019-10341 )
and described as Rorke's permanent address on 25 April, 1963. Manhattan residents, especially those raised to
adulthood in that place seldom move to other boroughs. Unless both Rorke and in-law Sherman Billingsley were
bankrupted simultaneously, Rorke would not have had a residence in Flushing. The family was evidently close knit.:


https://www.maryferrell.org/showDoc.html...elPageId=3