There will be a story on the RFK JF interview at CTKA very soon.
We have to get that interview online ASAP. COuld be very helpful.
Also, we will be reworking the face of the CTKA site soon so it coincides with the 50th.
We will be billing the major research discoveries that demolish without question CE 399. There will be about four of them in a row. ANd this will then expose the WC and all its defenders up to and including Posner and Bugliosi as the frauds they are and were.
We will then build on that by trying to construct or link to a timeline of 1963, these have been very effective in other cases in showing how events that did not seem related actually were.
Marketing? Gerald Riviera screened Abraham Zapruder's film, in the company of Robert Groden and Dick Gregory.
Geraldo Rivera. Back and to the left. Simple physics brought the House Select Committee on Assassinations.
Stone's JFK relying in large measure on Donald Sutherland's masterful portrayal of X the Prouty character flooded congress bringing the JFK Act.
The documents released under same have produced one major masterpiece, James Douglass, JFK and the Unspeakable: Why He Died and Why It Matters.
The context provided therein is a panoply of the opposition. Donald Gibson, Battling Wall Street: The Kennedy Presidency, was accurate, but dry.
In like fashion, Thy Will Be Done: The Conquest of the Amazon: Nelson Rockefeller and Evangelism in the Age of Oil, presents the business model which dispatched the 35th president, but is overlong for the majority of Americans.
Simply put, Kennedy was killed that power could continue to have its way, and every detail of the preparation, execution and subsequent investigation has been designed to foster the vital cover story.
For the event is not isolated but typical.
Was Benghazi a video protest? What does it matter? Subjects ought not ask if their government is arming Muslim Brotherhood, or Sinaloa Cartel, or Contras, or both sides in Cuba.
Destiny Betrayed, second edition, shows the association of Shaw, Banister, Ferrie, Arcacha Smith, Oswald, Ruby and others, provides the context always concealed by the propaganda assets. Shows the government so feared the absurd Garrison circus it mounted the most massive FBI/CIA/Mockingbird operation in domestic history, proving the Soviet maxim: Don't believe anything until it has been officially denied.
The dark decade of the Vietnam War is critical to understanding American power in the Twentieth Century. Knowing Kennedy was killed to allow its prosecution is indispensible to knowing the heart of darkness which mocks, "What difference does it make?"
What difference that the towers collapsed and hundreds of thousands of warriors invaded two countries--the pattern is the same.
There will always be these foreign schemes warned of by Washington and Truman unless the truth sears our souls.
The regime counts on the soma of Superbowl and Dallas to stifle interest in why bankers and OPEC prosper in a time of contraction.
Kennedy, Gibson pointed out, sought cheap and plentiful energy for all, and better quality of life for the world. Where's the profit in that?
Now Sherry Fiester, Enemy of the Truth, uses state of the art forensic technique to show the headshot came from opposite the Confusatory.
Ruth Paine was close to Allen Dulles as a rash. Her framing of the Patsy furthered the work of the execrable Angleton.
The whole was used to incinerate a subcontinent and maim a generation, cripple a nation.
What does it matter?
The mad woman from Total Recall explodes her head on her way through airport security.
The shadow government will grope you and debase you before flying you into the Potemkin Tower
While the ghost of E. Howard Hunt forges one more cable
And the professional wrestler and the professor folk dance with the queen of chicory
Listen to the son of the man from the hill of hickory
02-02-2013, 07:04 AM (This post was last modified: 02-02-2013, 07:23 AM by Jim Hackett II.)
Lingering doubt in 1963 is where the journey started. The Sunday Morning Murder of Lee Oswald planted the seed. I thought everyone deserved a lawyer when charged with a crime and now the man was dead, killed while handcuffed to Police Officers by a "friend and familiar" to the Dallas Police Department.
I was only 10 but I knew the pledge of allegiance I swore to every damn weekday morning was bogus and something was rotten in Dallas.
Marketing beyond the op after-event plans of JJAngleton and EHHunt and EGLansdale and DAPhillips et al. in my opinion had little to do with my confusion beyond the events themselves unfolding in front of the CBS eye thence to my lying eyes. I know adults were thinking in similar lines and some were quite conservative in view but still were not as fascist as some Americans I encounter today.
Somewhere between the Tet "offensive" - another odd failure of imagination for the spooks - and Watergate I shed the confusion and became aware I was not confused but was lacking in proper information.
Long after others of my generation I read Ms. Meagher's book and Mr. Lane's first book I read too. I have to give credit to Mr. Thompson's book too.
Six Seconds in Dallas, a library copy I was carrying into a current affairs class to read in dead boring study hall next high school period, sparked a discussion about the murder. My first 'research paper' with citations and such was assigned from that discussion. I wish I had a copy now.
Fletcher Prouty and his paperback "Secret Team" and a chance encounter with the Jack White Poster about more than one Oswald in US Government records were instrumental in my own evolution to shed the confusion.
Media Marketing to be sure to some extent, but that is what began to teach me critical thinking, a scientific logic class at IU Bloomington didn't help near so much as those writers and thinkers. Not as boring or expensive either.
Then I saw Mr. Penn Jones Jr. speak. I don't have a descriptive phrase for Mr. Jones, I was energized. A man of the people having seen the face of fascism up close and personal speaking in the salty ways of my working class folks, kin and friends.
I didn't see the ABC Z film debut, I hated TV then for lying to us about SE Asia games of death. I didn't own a TV then.
I have no doubt of the broadcast impact. The first view I saw was a bootleg copy or copy of a copy in 8 mm and shocking enough. It was a time of classes and downgrade by choice from a new camaro to a used schwinn.
No TV but one nice Pioneer stereo I picked up cheap in the USMC in 74, not stolen but someone getting out sold it to me and I shipped it home for free on MATS when I got my freedom back.
That whole passage of time from 63 - 76 was an ancient and admittedly so Marketing but that is what got into my head. Talk Radio (Weisberg and Brussels mostly) kept the garden green and growing long before the hope turned to ashes in the Blakey engineered abortion of the HSCA.
I know the above model is outmoded in the 21st Century. It was the old fashioned persuasion and passion of the first generation of researchers that sold "Deep Politics" as a world view to me. It helps to keep the mind growing and able to handle new ideas as I age.:lol:
It took me a while to catch up and to shed outdated ideas of the Coup of November compared to some of my generation.
But the journey to free independent critical thinking was started I hope to my own benefit and I hope some others around me over the years by marketing I undertake on a more one-to-one basis.
For that effort the 21st and 20th Century so called "new" materials I make use of in discussions with curious persons. I try to tell folks about Len Osanic's Black Op Radio Show and his "50 Reasons for 50 Years" video series. Wearing the BOR T-shirt kinda helps because lots of people want to know what is BOR. Underground subversives? Sometimes I almost laugh out loud.
FWIW
Jim
:plane: :plane: :plane:
Oh man I hate formation flying.
David Josephs Wrote:In the real world marketing is: MEETING NEEDS PROFITABLY
What do the fence sitters and nay-sayers NEED to BUY our PRODUCT - Answer that question and THEN talk about the package
DJ
Sorry David, but I have no "product" to sell and these matters cannot be reduced to a "package".
I understand and will continue to expose the mechanisms, distortions and lies of sanctioned "Conspiracy Theory" marketing and branding.
And denounce the purposely channelled False Prophets such as Fetzer and Ventura.
I will not adopt the techniques of branding nor accept that these figureheads represent the only permissible Yang to the elite's falsified Ying.
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War." Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta." The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
02-02-2013, 02:33 PM (This post was last modified: 02-02-2013, 03:18 PM by Charles Drago.)
Jim DiEugenio Wrote:There will be a story on the RFK JF interview at CTKA very soon.
We have to get that interview online ASAP. COuld be very helpful.
Also, we will be reworking the face of the CTKA site soon so it coincides with the 50th.
We will be billing the major research discoveries that demolish without question CE 399. There will be about four of them in a row. ANd this will then expose the WC and all its defenders up to and including Posner and Bugliosi as the frauds they are and were.
We will then build on that by trying to construct or link to a timeline of 1963, these have been very effective in other cases in showing how events that did not seem related actually were.
THat is just for starters.
Noble and necessary, to be sure.
But why should we expect the consumption of old wine in new bottles to produce anything but the same old hangover?
In other words: Why should we expect a re-iteration/analysis of the RFK, Jr. comments, a new website design, additional assaults on the long-ago breached SBT walls, and publication of a timeline of a sort that has been "effective in other cases" for the wholly unique case of JFK's murder -- all on a website that preaches exclusively, if eloquently, to a powerless choir -- to change the paradigm and bring about justice for JFK?
What precisely do you/we wish to accomplish for the 50th? Absent a destination, the planning of a route amounts to nothing but a tragic waste of time and energy.
Although it has been used and abused, the definition of madness attributed to Albert Einstein seems worthy of reiteration here:
"The definition of 'insanity' is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results."
"It means this War was never political at all, the politics was all theatre, all just to keep the people distracted...."
"Proverbs for Paranoids 4: You hide, They seek."
"They are in Love. Fuck the War." Gravity's Rainbow, Thomas Pynchon
"Ccollanan Pachacamac ricuy auccacunac yahuarniy hichascancuta." The last words of the last Inka, Tupac Amaru, led to the gallows by men of god & dogs of war
David Josephs Wrote:In the real world marketing is: MEETING NEEDS PROFITABLY
What do the fence sitters and nay-sayers NEED to BUY our PRODUCT - Answer that question and THEN talk about the package
DJ
Sorry David, but I have no "product" to sell and these matters cannot be reduced to a "package".
I understand and will continue to expose the mechanisms, distortions and lies of sanctioned "Conspiracy Theory" marketing and branding.
And denounce the purposely channelled False Prophets such as Fetzer and Ventura.
I will not adopt the techniques of branding nor accept that these figureheads represent the only permissible Yang to the elite's falsified Ying.
Stone's JFK is not a documentary... there are sites devoted to nothing but showing the "poetic license" taken.
Loose Change is a documentary... Pentacon... etc. and is recent and relevant and deathly important... is it making a difference?
We'd like to think so.
CE399 - which I have always believed was never in DP... STILL has the c2766 rifle's signature... which then requires us to open that can of worms
and eyes glaze again...
Fetzer's project is called the "Oswald Innocence Campaign" - what happens when campaigns fail... and someone else wins...
The loser slinks off and disappears to history.... (and goes on to other more relevant conspiracies)
Damage to Fetzer's JFK presentation (which is as simple as reading the rest of Fritz's notes - the backbone of his argument - and finding he changed his clothes) damages the entire FJK effort... it back burners it as being "fringe" and lets Fetz sell MANY more 9/11 books, tapes and bobble heads
Fetz is winning this one... and it's brilliant. when WE trash Fetz's Oswald/Altgens, we TRASH the one product we are trying to put a face to.... he is forcing us to publically state that his Oswald Innocence is the RIGHT conclusion - which we KNOW it is - just from the wrong evidence... or get on the bandwagon, shut up and unify.
He (they) have now made it necessary to both discredit and distance ourselves from him... while proving his conclusion for ourselves....
Carolyn Arnold signed an FBI statement stating she saw Oswald walking past those same front doors at 12:25, after 12:20... and walk away.
We have discussed here... I personally have promoted the theory that the Lunchroom was a fable created by Baker/Truly and Fritz since they actually did run into someone, just not Oswald.
Yet if a Fable... where then was Oswald after passing the front doors and Carolyn's vision? Did he walk out the front door? Do we know what happens in the 20 minutes "someone" takes Altgens film and comes back with a photo?
The analysis of the image is not the issue... we know Baker's affidavit does not mention a lunchroom... written THAT DAY...
If it was Oswald coming down the stairs... it's a slam dunk - yet that's not where the testimony goes.... closing mechanisms, little windows... and a coke that gets excised... BY Baker.
Is it just a LITTLE more possible that Oswald was stading out front? I think Just as likely as Craig was right about Oswald leaving the way HE saw....
So round and round we go and the only one screaming "OSWALD IS INNOCENT - HERE'S {one reason} WHY" is Fetz.
Add his "probability" BS and the site and reasoning is a fiasco
So I ask again... WHAT is our product... WHY and WHO are we talking to?
How do we counter, "3 shots, three shells, his rifle" without it sounding like the DNA evidence at OJ's trial?
IMO... Oswald in Mexico makes or breaks it all...
If he WAS there, he was there involved in a conspiracy... not a LONE anything
If he was not... the CIA created the scapegoat 8 weeks prior to the killing
Hoover's letter on Dec 12th specifically states he was not / is not comfortable with charging Oswald alone based on MEXICO CITY FBI sources.. this is HARD evidence that is impossible to refute...
Nothing DVP or McAdams can say can counter that paragraph... or the simplicity of the logic....
The LNer cannot escape that Oswald HAD to be in Mexcio City on those dates.. for the sole purpose of arranging passage via friendlies back to Russia.
If that's not him in Mexico, "Oswald is a Patsy set up by the CIA"
Correct me if I'm wrong here... there simply is no argument that can overturn this conclusion and logic...
11:35 a.m. December 12, 1963
MEMORANDUM FOR: MR. TOLSON
MR. BELMONT
MR. MOHR
MR. CONRAD
MR. DELOACH
MR. EVANS
MR. ROSEN
MR. SULLIVAN
Mr. Lee Rankin called from New York to check in with me on the matter of the Commission. He wanted to work out an arrangement with me which he thought might be satisfactory. He said he understood Mr. Belmont handled the investigation. I told Mr. Rankin that Mr. Belmont, Mr. Rosen and I handled the preparation of the report and will handle additional leads as they come in.
Mr. Rankin asked how he should handle anything that comes up, things the Commission will want developed further, in regard to the FBI - whether they should be handled directly with me or somebody I would designate.
I replied that I will designate someone. I explained that I sent Mr. Malley down to Dallas to handle all of our angles down there; that he was on the ground there; and that I think he probably would be the man who would be more familiar with things Mr. Rankin should further explore. I stated Mr. Malley is in Dallas at the present time but will be ordered back tomorrow; that he will be available; and that we will be glad to run out any additional men as he may want.
Mr. Rankin of the difficulty about the Department's desire to issue certain conclusions; that they wanted to issue a statement before the report went to the Commission with the conclusion Oswald was the assassin, no foreign or subversive elements involved, and Rubenstein and Oswald had no connection; that I flatly disagreed; they took Memorandum for Messers. Tolson, Belmont, Mohr, December 12, 1963
page 2
Conrad, Deloach, Evans, Rosen, Sullivan
it up with the White House and the President agreed with me that we should reach no conclusion; nevertheless the report does reach two conclusions in substance.
I said I personally believe Oswald was the assassin; that the second aspect as to whether he was the only man gives me great concern; that we have several letters, not in the report because we were not able to prove it, written to him from Cuba referring to the job he was going to do, his good marksmanship, and stating when it was all over he would be brought back to Cuba and presented to the chief; but we do not know if the chief was Castro and cannot make an investigation because we have no intelligence operation in Cuba; that I did not put this into the report because we did not have proof of it and didn't want to put speculation in the report; that this was the reason I urged strongly that we not reach conclusion Oswald was the only man.
As to Rubenstein, I said I did not want a statement about Rubenstein and Oswald; that we have no proof they were ever together. I stated Rubenstein is a shady character from the hoodlum element of Chicago, has a poor background, runs a nightclub in Dallas, and is what would be called a police buff; that the police officers in the precinct have been able to get food and liquor from him at any time they drop in; that while I think there was no connection between him and Oswald, I did not want the report to be 100% sure on that.
Fourth, I stated I did not believe any conclusions concerning Rubenstein should be reached at this time because he has not been tried; that was why I suggested to the Attorney General of Texas - and understand the Chief Justice did too- that his court of special inquiry be held in abeyance until after the Commission makes its findings. I said I thought they would go ahead with the Rubenstein trial in February; that was why I felt our report should name merely the facts we have established.
I further stated there may be some aspects Mr. Rankin will want to have run out farther; that there may be letters written to members of the Commission; that we have letters from people who claim to have seen Oswald; that up to the time we submitted the report we had cleared up all these angles except the Cuban thing which I discussed generally and explained that the informer recanted and blew that angle out of the window; that sort of thing may be popping up all the time. I advised Mr. Rankin if he wanted any leads followed out or any implementation of what we have already done we will give him 100% cooperation. Mr. Rankin stated he knew we would; that he just wanted to
-2-
Memorandum for Messers. Tolson, Belmont, Mohr, December 12, 1963
page 3
Conrad, Deloach, Evans, Rosen, Sullivan
establishing it as a matter I should know. I told him not to hesitate to call me; that I will designate Mr. Malley and he will advise me at once of anything. Mr. Rankin then said he would get in touch with me if he thinks there is anything which should be taken up on that level.
I mentioned to him the actions of the Soviet Embassy, the Communist Party in New York, and John Abt is making available to us their information on Oswald.
I also discussed the operations of the Dallas Police Department in the case which led to the murder of Oswald.
I told Mr. Rankin the Department held the report about five days and then began to leak items from the Department on it, items such as the shooting of General Walker, things not known in Dallas; that I kept pressing them to get the report to the Commission; that a debate was going on between the Department and me; that I did not want any conclusion drawn but I thought a conclusion had been made in the letter of transmission to the Commission; that there would have been no purpose in appointing a Presidential Commission except to evaluate the facts; that it was the duty of the FBI to get the facts
and let the Commission reach a conclusion.
I told Mr. Rankin we would want to do anything we can here to make his job easier. He said he has always had complete confidence in that and in me.
Mr. Rankin inquired if anything had been done about seeing that the films would be preserved and available for the Commission. I answered that we have them ourselves; that we have films taken by private individuals; that the President was not being covered by a car with television people as they do here in Washington; that there was not a professional photographer where this took place; that the Secret Service car immediately in back had already passed the building, which was at an angle, with the result they couldn't tell where the shots were coming from. I mentioned the comment by former Chief of Secret Service Baughman that he could not understand why the Secret Service men did not open fire with machine guns at the window. I said the Secret Service men did not see where the shots came from and would have killed a lot of innocent people if they had done so.
In connection with stories indicating that Oswald could not have done this alone, I stated he was a marksman and it wasn't anything he
-3-
Memorandum for Messrs. Tolson, Belmont, Mohr December 12, 1963
page 4
Conrad, DeLoach, Evans Rosenm Sullivan
could not do; that we have tested it on our rifle range and were able to get shots off even faster than he did; that there is no question in my mind about it; that we also found the fingerprints and the bullets so conclusively fired from the gun; that we have all this and we have all the photographs.
Mr. Rankin inquired if we also have the television film run off of the shooting of Oswald, and I told him we have this.
Mr. Rankin said Mr. Malone delivered to him a copy of the report and also offered to help in any way possible; this was very kind of Malone; but he will not deal with Malone in anything unless it is some emergency and he has to handle it locally. I told Mr. Rankin this was all right and, if he should need to call upon Malone, Malone would be available.
I also told Mr. Rankin there is a direct wire between the New York Office and here; that he can always place any calls to here over our wire; and that I will arrange for this. I told Mr. Rankin to let us know if there is anything we can do.
