21-06-2015, 11:00 PM
I disagree David.
And you left out the first part.
Namely, if it was Oswald. That is the key question.
This goes to the whole skullduggery that Goodpasture did on the man in Mexico masquerade.
Which Lopez and Hardway expose as a complete sham. In other words, she knew at a very early date it was wrong. And, in fact, Dan and Ed identify who he really was and maintain she had to have known who he was.
As per Win Scott, please read what I wrote in the first essay about Angleton, Goodpasture and Scott's death. That was not Oswald. And she knew it.
Sometimes I wonder: How many people have actually read the entire Lopez Report? I read it twice. Once in its first declassified format to prepare for my interview with Eddie Lopez. And then again, when I rewrote Destiny Betrayed.
Danny and Eddie stick to the facts. Which is why their work is invaluable.
And you left out the first part.
Namely, if it was Oswald. That is the key question.
This goes to the whole skullduggery that Goodpasture did on the man in Mexico masquerade.
Which Lopez and Hardway expose as a complete sham. In other words, she knew at a very early date it was wrong. And, in fact, Dan and Ed identify who he really was and maintain she had to have known who he was.
As per Win Scott, please read what I wrote in the first essay about Angleton, Goodpasture and Scott's death. That was not Oswald. And she knew it.
Sometimes I wonder: How many people have actually read the entire Lopez Report? I read it twice. Once in its first declassified format to prepare for my interview with Eddie Lopez. And then again, when I rewrote Destiny Betrayed.
Danny and Eddie stick to the facts. Which is why their work is invaluable.