06-07-2015, 07:49 PM
Like I said Dave, it sure seemed to me like a covert op was beginning.
But consider what happened in officialdom:
"Now, all of these conflicts and questions are in the record before Oswald has even left New Orleans! And, in fact, the record is so confusing that Bugliosi and his first ghostwriter Fred Haines are forced to write the following: "It has never been conclusively established precisely when Oswald left New Orleans, what route he took from New Orleans to the Mexican border, or even what mode of transportation he took out of New Orleans."[SUP]46[/SUP] The ambiguity about the unemployment check and the address card change are part of it. So is the fact that there is no bus ticket or receipt in evidence for Oswald from New Orleans to Houston. Thus, the Commission cannot even tell us the bus he left on.[SUP]47[/SUP] And the person whose testimony they use to say he left New Orleans by bus is, of all people, Marina Oswald! Who happened to be in Texas at the time.[SUP]48[/SUP] It is one thing to use a witness with credibility problems who has direct testimony on a matter. But to use such a person when she has no direct knowledge of the event is completely unjustified. And the Commission had to know that. But this is how desperate they were to get Oswald on a bus and out of New Orleans. So they had to cover up the fact that in her first Secret Service interviews, Marina said she had no knowledge of Lee going to Mexico City![SUP]49[/SUP] Therefore her testimony in not just irrelevant, its contradictory. Recall, Bugliosi has said Marina's credibility was good at the start. Did he forget about this issue?
By making this unproven claim, the Commission takes care of all four events I described above. They discard them all except for the phone call by Oswald to the Twiford home. Yet, when the sighting of Oswald in Austin with Selective Service employee Lee Dannelly was researched by journalist Ronnie Dugger, and he found two other witnesses to Oswald being there.[SUP]50[/SUP] Henry McCluskey wrote a letter to the Commission saying Oswald was at the Texas Employment Commission in Dallas on the 25th or 26th to change the address on his unemployment claim. That letter disappeared.[SUP]51[/SUP] But he also said that Oswald's presence there in September and on October 3rd could be verified by Oswald's Interstate Claims Card. This card did exist. The FBI and Warren Commission secured it. But when they printed it in the volumes they cut off the bottom of the card, which would have revealed the dates Oswald was at the TEC.[SUP]52[/SUP] As everyone knows, the Commission said that Sylvia Odio was wrong about Oswald being at her apartment. It was really Bill Seymour, Larry Howard, and Loran Hall. Which, of course, was all later discredited."
Deny, deny, deny. Even if your denial is BS.
But consider what happened in officialdom:
"Now, all of these conflicts and questions are in the record before Oswald has even left New Orleans! And, in fact, the record is so confusing that Bugliosi and his first ghostwriter Fred Haines are forced to write the following: "It has never been conclusively established precisely when Oswald left New Orleans, what route he took from New Orleans to the Mexican border, or even what mode of transportation he took out of New Orleans."[SUP]46[/SUP] The ambiguity about the unemployment check and the address card change are part of it. So is the fact that there is no bus ticket or receipt in evidence for Oswald from New Orleans to Houston. Thus, the Commission cannot even tell us the bus he left on.[SUP]47[/SUP] And the person whose testimony they use to say he left New Orleans by bus is, of all people, Marina Oswald! Who happened to be in Texas at the time.[SUP]48[/SUP] It is one thing to use a witness with credibility problems who has direct testimony on a matter. But to use such a person when she has no direct knowledge of the event is completely unjustified. And the Commission had to know that. But this is how desperate they were to get Oswald on a bus and out of New Orleans. So they had to cover up the fact that in her first Secret Service interviews, Marina said she had no knowledge of Lee going to Mexico City![SUP]49[/SUP] Therefore her testimony in not just irrelevant, its contradictory. Recall, Bugliosi has said Marina's credibility was good at the start. Did he forget about this issue?
By making this unproven claim, the Commission takes care of all four events I described above. They discard them all except for the phone call by Oswald to the Twiford home. Yet, when the sighting of Oswald in Austin with Selective Service employee Lee Dannelly was researched by journalist Ronnie Dugger, and he found two other witnesses to Oswald being there.[SUP]50[/SUP] Henry McCluskey wrote a letter to the Commission saying Oswald was at the Texas Employment Commission in Dallas on the 25th or 26th to change the address on his unemployment claim. That letter disappeared.[SUP]51[/SUP] But he also said that Oswald's presence there in September and on October 3rd could be verified by Oswald's Interstate Claims Card. This card did exist. The FBI and Warren Commission secured it. But when they printed it in the volumes they cut off the bottom of the card, which would have revealed the dates Oswald was at the TEC.[SUP]52[/SUP] As everyone knows, the Commission said that Sylvia Odio was wrong about Oswald being at her apartment. It was really Bill Seymour, Larry Howard, and Loran Hall. Which, of course, was all later discredited."
Deny, deny, deny. Even if your denial is BS.