01-08-2015, 01:05 AM
F. Carlier Wrote:Of course, the backyard photos are genuine, period. They were not altered. Marina took them. It's Oswald's body and Oswald's face (nothing superimposed on anything), since it is Lee Oswald, and him alone, in the picture.
James DiEugenio and Jeff Carter can try to dissolve the facts all they want, they can only bamboozle those who agree to be bamboozled because they WANT to believe in a conspiracy at all cost.
The key is to know how to weigh evidence and separate facts from fiction. Logic itself precludes the altering of the backyard photos. There was certainly no need for would-be plotters to risk being detected. One picture would have been enough and besides, those photos can in no way prove the involvement of Oswald in the November 22, 1963, Dealey Plaza shooting. In other words, they were not necessary for would-be plotters.
Anyway, besides the experts (I mean, the real experts), the available evidence has shown without any doubt that those pictures are genuine, and that's all there is to it.
I have explained all of that at length in my book, but I am not the only one at all. Numerous reasonable authors have shown that the backyard photos are authentic. Writing long articles in the hope of claiming otherwise is just a waste of time.
When I was young, I used to read books on science and critical thinking. I learned about "self-delusion" but could not really understand how it worked. Thanks to James DiEugenio for providing me with a perfect example…
/F.C./
there is nothing you can say, hon that will "cause passionate debate," here or ANYWHERE else. Those that lapp milk from .john mcadams lone neuter plate deserve diahrrea, so, carry on... And you do drone on and on and on AND on! I didn't know Mel Ayton had a glee club here.... lmfao!