05-08-2015, 04:30 AM
I think somebody's losing the debate.
It's very unlikely that the sensitive technology of a polygraph would miss stress that was severe enough to get Yates committed. That doesn't line up with the FBI agent telling Dorothy Yates that the machine showed Ralph was telling the truth. The only reason we are debating this is because neo-con researchers and that blowhard Parker decided to attack some of the main victims in order to make themselves look like more discerning researchers. It's quite clear FBI needed to break Yates because he witnessed something very dangerous to the coup.
It's very unlikely that the sensitive technology of a polygraph would miss stress that was severe enough to get Yates committed. That doesn't line up with the FBI agent telling Dorothy Yates that the machine showed Ralph was telling the truth. The only reason we are debating this is because neo-con researchers and that blowhard Parker decided to attack some of the main victims in order to make themselves look like more discerning researchers. It's quite clear FBI needed to break Yates because he witnessed something very dangerous to the coup.