16-08-2015, 10:18 AM
Tom Scully Wrote:Agreed. Just thinking out loud here, Tom. A bit like questioning the position of her signature on the DL. Anyway, I wrote to the 'auctioneer' and requested an e-look at the supporting documents/provenance. Ozzie's mudder is not my area of expertise. Speaking of pictures (off-topic), did you ever run into any more fotos of Det. Gus Rose from the DPD? 'They' (there are two groups) keep saying it was your boy George a-standin' near the famous Doorway after the murder. Thanks again, Tom.Mark A. O'Blazney Wrote:......In the description of the DL for sale, it mentioned that Mrs. O had cancer. Maybe from taking Prednisone ? If she died in '81. Cancer does not discriminate at how long it takes to do its job. The Picture Business…… ain't it Grand ?
......and besides, it was Crafard! What happened to just say no, why not KISS? Faith based arguments collide. Unshakable resolve of the respective camps of supporters is the popcorn.
Quote:https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the...y-evidence
.....In particular, what counts as extraordinary depends entirely on what you know and believe. In the extreme case, if you know nothing, then everything is an extraordinary claim. As the comedian Elayne Boosler used to quip, "Popcorn is magic if you don't know how it happens." Even less extremely, whether a given scientific claim counts as extraordinary depends entirely on what you know and believe. The same claim can be extraordinary for some but not for others. ......
Why not get worked up defending what we can prove, but not when we are defending what we are impressed by?
Mark, it seems the reference to Marguerite's cancer is possibly misinformed. According to this 1967 article, her photo license, expiring in 1972, was issued in 1968....no earlier, no later. Her death certificate indicating a particulalrly
aggressive form of cancer is date in 1981.
.