14-10-2015, 05:25 PM
The Daily Beast does a Mockingbird type review:
Its author is most-likely a Mockingbird writer because he starts with a sympathetic intro but then suddenly enters this paragraph:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/20...n-jfk.html
Its author is most-likely a Mockingbird writer because he starts with a sympathetic intro but then suddenly enters this paragraph:
Quote:For one thing, Talbot's defense of these allegations rests far too heavily on hypothetical scenarios and intricately stitched together reconstructions of clandestine schemes, most of which are too heavily larded with innuendo, gossip, and hearsay to be credible. Too often, we are asked to accept that person X was engaged in some nefarious undertaking because person Y said they were, and person Z weighs in with some vague confirmation, along the lines of, "Oh, yes, that probably happened. It would have been just like X to do that …"
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/20...n-jfk.html

