13-11-2015, 01:35 PM
With all due respect, Jim, the more time and effort I put into doing my own research in reaction to your numerous presentations, the more I understand what you do not know and do not care to know. I've become convinced you have no idea what the specific FRB processing/clearing was for the yellow-tinted, tabulation card, aka the money order in the amount of $21.45. I have established the fact that the money order form sold at Dallas until close of business on 4 January, 1963, was processed by FRB and that processing included an FRB processing center operator manually reading the amount displayed on each blue-tinted money order and manually key punching holes into the money order card that denoted the amount the operator had manually read. So that is actual documentation of the FRB marking the blue-tinted money order tabulator card during processing, but the money order in the amount of $21.45 was on a yellow tinted tabulator card with holes corresponding to the face amount already key punched in as it was created by the new Friden money order machine. No documentation as to how the accepting bank or the FRB processing actually did or did not mark the new yellow tinted, post January 4, 1963 money orders sold at the Dallas P.O. has actually been presented by you, or by John.
But, we are discussing a money order with a March, 1963 date on it, and the only thing I know for sure is that you have no evidence related to the process marking of this yellow-tint, 1963 money order that required no FRB key punching. Remember the guy you told me was admitted into the NYC radio station to meet with the talk show host? This is a similar scenario in that, just as in that example, I supported all that I claimed with documentation both John and you had never seen before. You asked no questions, and you are not asking any in this go round. My agenda is seeking a high level of accuracy, and yours is making the pieces fit conclusions you rigidly cling to.
Quote:http://www.google.com/patents/US2785800
.......
..After payment at banks or post offices the postal money order cards are then cleared and processed at the Federal Reserve Bank by the present machine. A group of cashed money order cards is placed in the hopper or magazine of the present machine and upon depression of the motor release bar to cycle the machine each is automatically fed to a viewing station. During this time the District Number designation or hole which Was prepunched in the postal money order card is sensed and stored up by relays until such time that it is read out to control the predetermined extent of rotation of a sorting drum to select a pocket determined by the Federal Reserve District number designation.
With the card in the viewing station the amount written on the card is read by the operator and set up under control of the ten-key keyboard mechanism of the basic machine. For the first card fed from the magazine a depression of the motor release bar causes a single cycle of the operation of the machine and the rotation of the sorting drum at the termination of the cycle, but thereafter a depression of the motor release bar following the ten-key keyboard operation causes the machine to take two cycles, and the position of the drum is not changed until after the second cycle. During the first of the two cycles the card which was at the viewing station is fed to the punching station where it is stopped.
After the card punching has been completed the card stop located in the card punching mechanism is released and the card then advances to the check receiving chute of the basic machine.....
But, we are discussing a money order with a March, 1963 date on it, and the only thing I know for sure is that you have no evidence related to the process marking of this yellow-tint, 1963 money order that required no FRB key punching. Remember the guy you told me was admitted into the NYC radio station to meet with the talk show host? This is a similar scenario in that, just as in that example, I supported all that I claimed with documentation both John and you had never seen before. You asked no questions, and you are not asking any in this go round. My agenda is seeking a high level of accuracy, and yours is making the pieces fit conclusions you rigidly cling to.
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.

