The deposit slip that was never stamped by the bank

[Jim Hargrove]

Not only did the FNB of Chicago not stamp money orders, I guess they never stamped deposit slips as well.

The alleged Klein's deposit slip of 3/13/63 ( Waldman 10 ) has a date
of 2/15/63 and is not stamped by the First National Bank of Chicago,
which it should have been had it been deposited.

http://i56.tinypic.com/11gi0w6.jpg

Gil,


Megathanks for pointing out that the First National Bank of Chicago deposit slip for the alleged Klein's money order wasn't stamped or processed either, just like the money order itself. John and I had noticed other problems with the so-called deposit slip, but not that. This whole thing is ludicrous. The WC's Waldman Exhibit # 10 shows that the alleged deposit slip for the alleged money order for the alleged Hidell purchase of the rifle was dated 2/15/63, A MONTH BEFORE THE MONEY ORDER WAS ALLEGEDLY ISSUED!! Deposited nearly a month before it was issued?? What's more, the amount on the deposit slip appears to be $28.24, and not the $21.45 indicated on the money order. Obviously, neither the FBI nor the WC predicted the emergence of the internet, allowing so many of us to examine this "evidence" ourselves.


Here again, is your nifty graphic:




There is another issue about this money order I'd like to examine. Anyone old enough to remember the Kennedy assassination is probably old enough to remember how postal money orders were printed on heavy card stock. Look at the front and back of the money order in question:





Note how the circular Dallas date stamp bleeds through the paper and shows up on the back. There is a lot of other bleed through as well, including the handwriting on the front and the dated initials on the back. This should not occur on card stock; it generally doesn't even happen on typing paper.


What are we dealing with here? The original CE 788, of course, is an FBI photograph. But what did they photograph?