21-11-2015, 05:25 PM
Thursday 11-19-15, on BOR Jim D addressed this widely heard sentence among JFK research community.
He then pointed out the contradiction in having a tiny radio station like KPFK announce the Talbot Los Angeles talk and the incongruous crowd that gathered for it.
What we need to do IMO is point out why this perception persists and why this psychologically induced defeatism is, ironically, the indicator of the just how full-spectrum the JFK Assassination could go, should we ever grow the will to fight rather than the comfort of publishing more great material for an audience that remains on their designated reservation.
How and why is this plaque of defeatism so religiously spread on the incisors of dissent? I am not saying that this belief that people are uninterested is not understandable. I'm suggesting that if we look at this history of censorship FROM A PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE PERSPECTIVE -- which is after-all the perspective of CIA-- it is all to understandable, and remediable.
He then pointed out the contradiction in having a tiny radio station like KPFK announce the Talbot Los Angeles talk and the incongruous crowd that gathered for it.
What we need to do IMO is point out why this perception persists and why this psychologically induced defeatism is, ironically, the indicator of the just how full-spectrum the JFK Assassination could go, should we ever grow the will to fight rather than the comfort of publishing more great material for an audience that remains on their designated reservation.
How and why is this plaque of defeatism so religiously spread on the incisors of dissent? I am not saying that this belief that people are uninterested is not understandable. I'm suggesting that if we look at this history of censorship FROM A PSYCHOLOGICAL WARFARE PERSPECTIVE -- which is after-all the perspective of CIA-- it is all to understandable, and remediable.