29-11-2015, 05:48 PM
Smoking gun? Here is the real smoking gun:
Guinn's test showed that Cunningham was making a simplistic lie about rifles having sealed chambers. Nobody stepped up and said wait a minute, that's wrong rifles do emit residue. Those FBI experts knew this yet no one protested Cunningham's simplistic lie. No Lone Nutter asks why is Cunningham trying to get away with such an obvious lie? And why did no expert, of which there were many available to the Commission, point out Cunningham's egregious inaccuracy? Why was Cunningham lying? What was he trying to cover-up?
Guinn was expert enough that he knew the test could be fine-tuned to the specific primer/gunpowder mix of Oswald's alleged bullets. Guinn was smart and scientific. He knew he could rule-out non Oswald bullet contamination of the paraffin test by testing the casts for the specific mix of bullet primer and gunpowder. The "primer" is the little explosive cap that the firing pin hits and creates a small explosion that ignites the gunpowder. It has a very specific chemical signature and varies between types of ammunition. Guinn took the casts to the Oak Ridge nuclear reactor and had them tested at a very fine Neutron Activation level and the residue came up negative for Oswald's bullets. As a stable test standard he tested his own Carcano casts and they showed strong indication of the primer mix in the Neutron Activation test. This exonerated Oswald, so that criminal scumbag Hoover buried it.
The government literally had "smoking gun" evidence of Oswald's innocence and buried it.
(My previous reference to this as "Turner's test" was in error. Turner was reporting Guinn's test in an article and it was Guinn who did the actual testing. Same difference.)
Guinn's test showed that Cunningham was making a simplistic lie about rifles having sealed chambers. Nobody stepped up and said wait a minute, that's wrong rifles do emit residue. Those FBI experts knew this yet no one protested Cunningham's simplistic lie. No Lone Nutter asks why is Cunningham trying to get away with such an obvious lie? And why did no expert, of which there were many available to the Commission, point out Cunningham's egregious inaccuracy? Why was Cunningham lying? What was he trying to cover-up?
Guinn was expert enough that he knew the test could be fine-tuned to the specific primer/gunpowder mix of Oswald's alleged bullets. Guinn was smart and scientific. He knew he could rule-out non Oswald bullet contamination of the paraffin test by testing the casts for the specific mix of bullet primer and gunpowder. The "primer" is the little explosive cap that the firing pin hits and creates a small explosion that ignites the gunpowder. It has a very specific chemical signature and varies between types of ammunition. Guinn took the casts to the Oak Ridge nuclear reactor and had them tested at a very fine Neutron Activation level and the residue came up negative for Oswald's bullets. As a stable test standard he tested his own Carcano casts and they showed strong indication of the primer mix in the Neutron Activation test. This exonerated Oswald, so that criminal scumbag Hoover buried it.
The government literally had "smoking gun" evidence of Oswald's innocence and buried it.
(My previous reference to this as "Turner's test" was in error. Turner was reporting Guinn's test in an article and it was Guinn who did the actual testing. Same difference.)
