From fake 2000 electoral rolls to fake 9/11 victims

[Peter Lemkin]

Let me say that I am not investigating these claims, BUT
I WOULD NOT DISCOURAGE THOSE WHO ARE.

I believe it would be a fruitful area for research, and encourage
those who want to study it to do so. If just ONE fake victim is
found, it might open many doors.

I am particularly interested in the million dollar bribes to 911
victims families NOT TO TALK. Why was the money offered?
What were the families instructed not to say? Why was it thought
that families of victims should be compensated? This was a
strange and unprecedented GOVERNMENT response. Why?
I think this should be investigated. This has little to do with
faked names...or does it?

Jack

PS. Charles, I agree with your premise, but I think the Victims
Compensation Fund is a separate issue and possible smoking gun.

I think there were a FEW faked 'victims' including some [or all] of the 'hijackers', and some of those who made some of the more famous 'phone calls' the most likely. We have less information to work with than we do on Dallas...but slowly we make progress none the less. I just can't imagine 'no real victims', and think that that is either very foggy thinking or a campaign to discredit the 911-Truth community. I could even imagine a FEW who knew having themselves placed on the victim list to collect on their life insurance policy or in some way benefit from falsely being 'dead'....but, again, just a very few...

I think Jack's point on the hush-money is very important!