04-02-2016, 11:59 PM
I must have missed this one Chris...
Aren't the cones simply in a 3 point line back to Zapruder?
As I wrote this I stopped... for Shot #1 maybe but #3 obviously does not follow that logic...
If they are 235 and 255 the sidewalk cone is Altgens so the Street cone would be where the rear bumper would be when the front bumper hits the 255 cone ????
Again, thanks Chris - I'll be adding this analysis summary to my 3rd Article which talks about the evidence offered...
I'll make sure to run it by your first so I am saying what you are meaning
:-)
Aren't the cones simply in a 3 point line back to Zapruder?
As I wrote this I stopped... for Shot #1 maybe but #3 obviously does not follow that logic...
If they are 235 and 255 the sidewalk cone is Altgens so the Street cone would be where the rear bumper would be when the front bumper hits the 255 cone ????
Again, thanks Chris - I'll be adding this analysis summary to my 3rd Article which talks about the evidence offered...
I'll make sure to run it by your first so I am saying what you are meaning
:-)
Chris Davidson Wrote:Chris Davidson Wrote:Two different distance locations via the pylons for shot#1.
chris
The pylons set out for the 1st shot appear to be at approx extant z235 (Connally shot ?) and it's curbside counterpart at approx extant z255.
If you want to place the 1st pylon, use the lane markers between the two light posts for orientation purposes.
More than likely, the distance between the shot1 pylons is probably a representation of the limo front to limo rear span, with the back bumper (street pylon) representing JFK'S position in the limo. Same as the other pylons further down the street.
chris
![[Image: Shot1A.jpg]](http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r25/123steamn/Shot1A.jpg)
![[Image: Shot1AA.jpg]](http://i140.photobucket.com/albums/r25/123steamn/Shot1AA.jpg)
Once in a while you get shown the light
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter
in the strangest of places if you look at it right..... R. Hunter