The SS and FBI place 4 shots in and around Z313 - just not Z313

[David Josephs]

How did they remove the wide turn from Towner & Hughes, Chris? 7 frames cannot possible remove all of it... that's only a split second

And I'm pretty sure this helps prove that Zap didn't stop and start his camera... So I get the removal of it from Zap - that's easy...

And once the film is cut, syncing the other 3 films: Nix, Muchmore (who didn't film it anyway) and Bronson gets alot easier.

I have the same feelings about Moorman. That's obviously not down where the "headshot" occurred - can you explain that image?

David,

Using this Bond-Muchmore? combo, can you describe/point out where the "headshot" location is?

I've always believed their were 2 headshots. extant313 and Altgens

chris

In relation to what Chris? Muchmore claims she did not film any shooting, Bond does not have an image of the shots

Extant 313 shows a shot to the front right of JFK's head and is matched in Nix and Muchmore and Bronson
yet for Altgens to be correct about the shot 15 feet from him it would have had to occur after extant Z345 while WCD298 putts the shot around Z375.



If the FBI believed the real evidence would never be seen, they could have simply created a shot further down to support 3 shots 3 hits and provide enough time/space for reloading and firing.

If the limo stops as so many claim then the time from 313 to 375 (62 frame / 18.3fps = 3.39 seconds) is probably very close to the stopping time or how the car inched forward slowly per BREHM:






I happen to really like this composite. As I created it it became more and more clear that WCD298 was created as a plausible explanation for what may have occurred.

The "Completely misleading picture" Redlich calls the FBI and SS reports in April 1964 which would include WCD1, WCD3 and this model was either CYA or the discovery of the FBI's method of covering up what happened.
When these men saw the Zfilm with Eisenberg at this time and read WCD298 and saw the model they had to have known immediately something was wrong. The film(s) do not support this model or its info.

One of the most blatant and amazing part of this model's presentation to the Commission is what Leo Gauthier says about the WEST survey. As I ask yet apparently was not realized by this group of America's best and brightest:

How can a survey completed in May 1964 be used to construct a model in January 1964? Because the first version of the survey for the SS was completed on Dec 5th and had a shot placed at 5+00

http://www.ctka.net/2016/JosephsFBIZ313.pdf

Mr. GAUTHIER. Our data to build this were compiled on December 2, 3, and 4. It took about5 weeks to prepare this exhibit in Washington.

Mr. SPECTER. Did you participate in theonsite tests made in Dallas?
Mr. GAUTHIER. I did.
Mr. SPECTER. Was a survey made of thescene used to record some of the results of that onsite testing?
Mr. GAUTHIER. Yes.
Mr. SPECTER. And by whom was the survey made?
Mr. GAUTHIER. Thesurvey was made on May 24, 1964*, by Robert H. West, countysurveyor, a licensed State land surveyor, located at 160 County Courthouse,Dallas, Tex.
(*Anyone else trying to figure out how theFBI used a May 1964 survey in preparation of a Jan 20 1964 presentation?)

When we superimpose the Dec 5 survey onto DP from 11/23/63 - complete with yellow curbs - a shot is still placed 40 feet further down Elm









Are you saying Altgens as placed at Z255? That can't be...

you must be talking about Altgens 7 right?

The Altgens which does not look like any other Altgens photo and is cropped at the upper right