Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Julian Assange - UN Rules in His Favour?
#15
David Guyatt Wrote:The Blighty government has announced it will arrest Assange if he leaves the embassy and deport him to Sweden. So their knee is bowed. Over to Sweden now...

Philip Hammond's Astonishing Lie

by craig on February 5, 2016 6:57 pm in Uncategorized
The official statement by the UK Foreign Secretary, Phillip Hammond:
"I reject the decision of this working group. It is a group made up of lay people and not lawyers. Julian Assange is a fugitive from justice. He is hiding from justice in the Ecuadorian embassy."
These are the cvs of the group (including the ex-chair who started the work). Hammond's statement that they are lay people and not lawyers is a blatant, a massive, an enormous, a completely astonishing lie. Yet nowhere has the media called him on this lie.
Sètondji Adjovi (Benin, Second Vice-Chair) Adjovi, an academic and practitioner specialising in international criminal procedure and judicial reform, worked at the International Criminal Court and at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda before his appointment to the UN WGAD.
Mads Andenas (Norway, Chair and member until mid-2015) Chair of UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention until mid-2015. Has previously held positions as Director of the Centre of European Law at King's College, University of London and Director of the British Institute of International and Comparative Law, London. Professor at the Faculty of Law of the University of Oslo.
Mr. José Guevara (Mexico, First Vice-Chair) Guevara is a legal academic and practitioner who focuses on Human Rights Protection and International Criminal Law. Prior to joining the WGAD, worked in the NGO sector, Mexico City's Ombudsman's office and in government in the area of human rights. Guevara is the recipient of the Open Society Foundation's New Executives Fund leading the Mexican Commission for the Defense and Promotion of Human Rights.
Seong-Phil Hong (Chair-Rapporteur, Republic of Korea) An expert member of the Asian Council of Jurists of the Asia Pacific Forum and legal academic, Seong-Phil Hong has specialised in the case for reparations regarding Japan's Enforced Sex Slavery during the Second World War and accountability for human rights violations by the North Korean regime.
Vladimir Tochilovsky (Ukraine) A legal academic and practitioner whose expertise lies in international criminal justice and procedure. Tochilovsky was part of the Preparatory Committee and Commission that drafted the guidelines on criminal procedure for the International Criminal Court.
Leigh Toomey (Australia) An expert in the UN Human Rights system, Toomey has taught at the Raoul Wallenberg Institute of Human Rights and Humanitarian Law and has served as a UN human rights expert both in the capacity as an NGO representative and as a representative for Australia at the UN General Assembly and Commission for Human Rights.
It is worth noting that the UN decision accords very closely with the minority verdicts of the two dissenting UK Supreme Court judges in the deeply split UK Supreme Court decision on the case. So by calling the UN panel "ridiculous", Hammond is saying the same of two UK Supreme Court justices.
You will not recall much media coverage of the dissenting verdicts in the UK Supreme Court decision. There was almost none. By contrast, the media are showing an obsessive interest in the dissenting Ukrainian member's opinion in this UN decision.
Norwegian Professor Mats Andenas, the chair of the Working Group who started the work, has today stated that the UK and US put enormous political pressure on the members of the UN working group, which they had resisted courageously. Can anybody think of a reason why the dissenting Ukrainian member might have been less able to resist enormous pressure from the UK and US governments?

https://www.craigmurray.org.uk/archives/...shing-lie/
"The philosophers have only interpreted the world, in various ways. The point, however, is to change it." Karl Marx

"He would, wouldn't he?" Mandy Rice-Davies. When asked in court whether she knew that Lord Astor had denied having sex with her.

“I think it would be a good idea” Ghandi, when asked about Western Civilisation.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Julian Assange - UN Rules in His Favour? - by Magda Hassan - 06-02-2016, 04:38 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  On Assange's Arrest - First they came for the....... Peter Lemkin 10 12,966 01-05-2019, 06:19 PM
Last Post: James Lateer
  US Justice Department Ducks Assange Querstions; Won't Come Clean on it's Intentions David Guyatt 4 16,128 21-04-2017, 01:56 PM
Last Post: David Guyatt
  Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is expected to appear in a UK court tomorrow! Peter Lemkin 250 149,901 22-08-2016, 05:19 PM
Last Post: Dawn Meredith
  People Have A 'Fundamental Right' To Own Assault Weapons, Court Rules Drew Phipps 0 4,918 05-02-2016, 03:30 PM
Last Post: Drew Phipps
  Court Rules Mumia Abu-Jamal’s Death Sentence is Unconstitutional, Grants New Sentencing Hearing Magda Hassan 2 5,876 06-03-2014, 10:27 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Court Rules Peace Activists Can Sue the U.S. Military for Infiltration Magda Hassan 0 3,602 21-12-2012, 03:29 AM
Last Post: Magda Hassan
  CIA 'tortured and sodomised' terror suspect, human rights court rules Magda Hassan 3 5,496 14-12-2012, 09:37 AM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Federal Court Rules In Favor Of US Torture Albert Doyle 1 3,966 03-05-2012, 04:30 PM
Last Post: Peter Lemkin
  Assange of Wikileaks charged with rape by the Shadow! 0 681 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:
  Assange and the European Arrest Warrant appeal 0 1,361 Less than 1 minute ago
Last Post:

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)