The SS and FBI place 4 shots in and around Z313 - just not Z313

[William Charleston]

It's one thing to say that shots where fired further down Elm... it's another to prove it.

Altgens claims the shots came when JFK was within 15 feet of him and that he missed that photo.

Moorman's photo makes it appear as if JFK is at the Z313 location to the EAST of the cones and identified shots from this following graphic.

The #2 FBI cone is obviously just in front of that black asphalt patch.

Yet as the inset overhead view shows... that leads directly to Altgens and the yellow curb by his feet.

Once we accept that these shots were indeed fired and that the FBI/SS must have had source material to support these placements

The films and photos of the shooting itself is only captured by a handful of images: Zapruder, Nix & Muchmore with a single photo by Moorman (the Bronson frames are not very clear).
There are no other images of the shooting itself. Bell is just after and helps prove the removal of Chaney with the McIntyre photo.

Ther is no way to line up FBI cone #2 and Moorman from the Zapruder pedastal (top left)

Somehow at least this shot if not a few more are removed from the evidentiary record.

If I am watching the Z film in its current state we can see EXACTLY where a headshot is shown
yet none of the SS/FBI locations matches to it.

The conclusion we must draw from this is that the FBI and SS saw source materials that are completely different from the evidence available today.

Zapruder's film alteration is not too hard to track, Nix's original is gone and Muchmore claims to have NEVER taken any footage of the shooting.










Moorman cannot be equated to any of these shots while both the SS and FBi have shot occurring after z313

Mr. SPECTER. Mr. Kellerman, you said earlier that there were at least two additional shots. Is there any area in your mind or possibility, as you recollect that situation, that there could have been more than two shots, or are you able to say with any certainty?
Mr. KELLERMAN. I am going to say that I have, from the firecracker report and the two other shots that I know, those were three shots. But, Mr. Specter, if President Kennedy had from all reports four wounds, Governor Connally three, there have got to be more than three shots, gentlemen.
Senator COOPER. What is that answer? What did he say?
Mr. SPECTER. Will you repeat that, Mr. Kellerman?
Mr. KELLERMAN. President Kennedy had four wounds, two in the head and shoulder and the neck. Governor Connally, from our reports, had three. There have got to be more than three shots.
Representative FORD. Is that why you have described--
Mr. KELLERMAN. The flurry.

Mr. SPECTER. When was it that Mrs. Kennedy made the statement which you have described, "My God, what are they doing?"
Mr. KELLERMAN. This occurred after the flurry of shots.
Mr. SPECTER. At that time you looked back and saw Special Agent Hill across the trunk of the car, had your automobile accelerated by that time?
Mr. KELLERMAN. Tremendously so; yes.
Mr. SPECTER. Now, to the best of your ability to recollect, exactly when did your automobile first accelerate?
Mr. KELLERMAN. Our car accelerated immediately on the time-at the time--this flurry of shots came into it.
Mr. SPECTER. Would you say the acceleration--
Mr. KELLERMAN. Between the second and third shot.


I love how a FLURRY OF SHOTS can come between two identified shots #2 & #3 - wouldn't that make shot #3 = shot #2 + a flurry of shots ???.

This also confirms there being another shot after Hill gets on the limo... which is not shown in the evidence.... Part 3 in the works... CTKA will be reposting Part 1 with Part 2 shortly...

DJ

WHY did Kellerman think the last two shots were BANG-BANG, two shots fired a split second apart?

Why did this witness think the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bUagGiWd5cY

Why did this witness think the last two shots were BANG-BANG?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NNcYG-m08g

WHY did DOZENS of witnesses think the last two shots were fired BANG-BANG, two shots fired a split second apart? You'll forgive me but I am NOT going to paste links to dozens more witnesses who said the last two shots were BANG-BANG but this fact is finding more and more attention as many JFKers start to realize the gubermint lied to them.

The NEXT clip shows only ONE witness who says he heard the last two shots fired BANG-BANG BUT (and all after BUT is usually BS, but NOT in this case) it turns out THREE of the SIX witnesses CBS showed (Dan Rather and Walter Cronkite) actually thought two of the shots were fired BANG-BANG, two shots fired a split second apart.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zhXTW3ySUY

It turns out CBS (which I think is more accurately called SEE BS) played a large part in allowing the conspiracy to succeed. Walter and Dan weren't co-conspirators, they were useful idiots. If the gubermint said it, the two stooges at SEE BS repeated it.

STARTING here (with the observation that MANY witnesses thought the last two shots were fired a split second apart)
allows YOU to SOLVE the JFK shooting mystery. What witnesses say they heard PROVES NOTHING BUT fortunately, there is other evidence that allows us to prove that the BANG-BANG witnesses were right and the gubermint was wrong. Along the way to finding the truth is that anyone with an IQ much above room temperature will begin to realize the only way for BANG-BANG to be hidden is for the gubermint to have forged MASSIVE amounts of evidence. Once you realize that is true, you will begin to see the immense power behind the assassination behind the conspiracy to kill JFK.