08-02-2016, 03:41 PM
Yah, it has problems. First, it's mostly secondary sources -- lots of them and many of them very good.
He certainly does point the finger at the CIA/Vatican nexus. There are lots about Nazi ratlines, drug running, money laundering in the Vatican Bank, etc. Lots more.
BUT here's the clinker. It's all driven by the hatred of the Communism with the unstated conclusion that it was a sad and corrupting over-reaction. He leaves out (as far as I can tell) the inherent logic of the NWO and world domination using the Cold War as cover. The danger of the book is that it is a limited hangout.
It's certainly worth reading, at least from my perspective.
He certainly does point the finger at the CIA/Vatican nexus. There are lots about Nazi ratlines, drug running, money laundering in the Vatican Bank, etc. Lots more.
BUT here's the clinker. It's all driven by the hatred of the Communism with the unstated conclusion that it was a sad and corrupting over-reaction. He leaves out (as far as I can tell) the inherent logic of the NWO and world domination using the Cold War as cover. The danger of the book is that it is a limited hangout.
It's certainly worth reading, at least from my perspective.
"We'll know our disinformation campaign is complete when everything the American public believes is false." --William J. Casey, D.C.I
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl
"We will lead every revolution against us." --Theodore Herzl