|
Contrived Evidence
|
16-02-2016, 06:12 PM
Drew Phipps Wrote:Here's the problem with the idea that the paystub was planted... It doesn't lead anywhere. Who or what is supposed to be framed by the paystub, and what theory is advanced, lone nut or CT? For that matter, what theory is made more likely by proving that the paystub is planted? Good questions. Unfortunately they apply to a lot of aspects of this case. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Contrived Evidence - by Alan Ford - 11-02-2016, 08:32 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Drew Phipps - 12-02-2016, 12:11 AM
Contrived Evidence - by Bob Prudhomme - 12-02-2016, 07:18 AM
Contrived Evidence - by Drew Phipps - 12-02-2016, 03:59 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Magda Hassan - 12-02-2016, 05:19 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Bob Prudhomme - 12-02-2016, 05:31 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Albert Doyle - 12-02-2016, 05:58 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Drew Phipps - 12-02-2016, 06:20 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Albert Doyle - 12-02-2016, 07:19 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Alan Ford - 15-02-2016, 07:07 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Albert Doyle - 15-02-2016, 07:29 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Alan Ford - 15-02-2016, 10:56 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Drew Phipps - 16-02-2016, 12:31 AM
Contrived Evidence - by Albert Doyle - 16-02-2016, 04:44 AM
Contrived Evidence - by Tracy Riddle - 16-02-2016, 06:12 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Alan Ford - 17-02-2016, 06:03 PM
Contrived Evidence - by Alan Ford - 17-02-2016, 11:29 PM
|
