Heads Up!

[Michael Cross]

Top of the morning to you, Mr. Cross, saw your name and just wanted to wish you a good day (never had an opportunity to thank you in another thread for lending your photographic expertise to the ongoing discussions on an important matter at hand).

Now, here's an update everyone, in case someone hasn't been following along already over on the EF thread authored by Mr. Hargrove, his Paul Revere like ride is up to 5 pages now, with 64 generated comments ----> http://educationforum.ipbhost.com/index....opic=22690

For the life of me, IF the wrongfully accused is legitimately guilty of what he has been accused of, Why on earth would any LN need to tamper with the words of researchers who clearly know otherwise?

Not only is this underhanded, it is also unfair to people just coming to the debate. We can only imagine how many people, demonstrating an interest in this five decades old murder mystery, having clicked upon those deceptively misleading links are now sold on the idea that every legitimate argument put forth proving Mr. Oswald's innocence was deceitfully shown to be deposed by these slight of hand tactics (what a disservice to the entire research community as a whole, not to mention a backhand to a sense of something much bigger than all of us, a sense of truth and justice altogether).

Does integrity matter?

Does it matter to some people that an innocent man was framed? His young, innocent daughters vilified?

How far will some people go to prove they "won" an argument?! Isn't this case much more than a LN "winning" a mere argument? If "winning" is cheating I'd rather lose.

How anyone can claim "victory" after editing out another researcher's genuine thoughts and contributions, taking them out of context, bending them to their "victory", etc., while shamelessly discrediting a fellow researcher, displaying disrespect for their time and energy is troubling to say the least.

Five decades in denial, and even now some people choose to "cook the books" rather than let the genuine evidence (not contrived "evidence") speak for itself.

Thanks Alan.

And yes, integrity matters. Researchers will be held to the highest possible standard by the LN group and those influencing them that lurk behind the scenes. More so, lies and disinformation will be routinely used against us. Which means we MUST hold ourselves to the highest possible standards of integrity. If we produce work that can stand on its own, then our work is done.