23-02-2016, 06:40 PM
Remote Controlled Humans Via Internet In Real-Time Now A Reality (Update) - http://www.activistpost.com/2013/08/remo...ernet.html
TOPICS:Activist PostMind Control AUGUST 8, 2013 Activist Post
Bold notes & underlining is true; italics emphasis are all mine: & more than this was possible in >2011
Every day seems to bring new revelations in the area of neuroscience.
image: University of Washington
Over the past year we have learned that scientists have been working on "neural dust" to create a remote-controlled computer pathway to the brain; that scientists have been successful implanting false memories in mice; an experiment at Harvard enabled a human to remote control a mouse by thought alone; and the world's first "telepathic e-mail" was sent.
However, when it was announced last year that remote-controlled humans via the Internet became a reality, it was still met with disbelief. The research team from the University of Washington who conducted this experiment is now announcing that they not only have duplicated their original experiment, but believe that they have moved a step closer to making this a viable technology that could be rolled out in the not-too-distant future. Their full press release with video follows our initial report below.
We recently reported on the release of a secret DARPA mind control program at Arizona State University. Part of that research was focused specifically on the attempt to replicate through language the same results obtained with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, which is a way to directly control movements, speech, and one's perception of reality via electromagnetic waves aimed at the cerebral cortex. Julie Beal also reported on DARPA's solicitation for portable brain recorders that could eventually be used in every classroom in America. Clearly there is a will to put research into action. Internal EEG & no TMS, unless it's subtle & local.
But so far, the ability to remote control an object from a distance with the mind alone has been limited to video games, drones, and the above-mentioned mouse. However, as you can see in the video below, a human-to-human remote link has been established. A researcher was able to control the hand movements of a person jacked in to the "brain net" in a completely different building: - https://youtu.be/rNRDc714W5I jack/Jack' is a very frequent reference I get; plays to the schiz training' as there are so many confusatory separate meanings.
As is typical, researchers are downplaying the technology by stressing that this type of stimulation is only possible through consenting participants. NO they add it surreptitiously to food and/or put you in a radio-frek induced deep sleepstate, break in to your home, and implant the victim'. Yet they repeatedly tout how wonderful it is because it is "non-invasive." With nanotechnology such as that used in neural dust, a pathway can easily be opened non-invasively (or surreptitiously), and control can be achieved wirelessly. Julie Beal has speculated that perhaps this type of wireless control over another human being's brain contributed to the strange "short circuits" that have been seen in many news reporters. It's no longer beyond the realm of possibility. ?
What once was the craziest of conspiracies has now entered the daily news cycle. And there is more to come:
"The Internet was a way to connect computers, and now it can be a way to connect brains," said researcher Andrea Stocco, assistant professor in psychology at the University of Washington.
[…]
Rao noted that his study managed "a one-way flow of information." It's firewalled; it's 1-way or 2-way by command, A/V
"The next step is having a more equitable two-way conversation directly between the two brains," he said. This is fully established as of at least <2012. This is synthetic telepathy; they' spend 24/7/52/+4 sitting inside your mind, 1-way; they can see what you see, hear what you hear, and are tapped-into the mind itself; the 2-way channel is opened as part of a scheme to drive you out of your own mind, by "malevolent god" impersonators, who reference, by auditory effects and pains everything msg'ful' that you see, hear and think, even the very act of thinking is referenced for purpose of shutting-down the autonomy of your own mind. Every time the tv mentions "death", or when you read the word "suicide" or anything at all related to anything at all bad', you get a reference to it, usually by neuralgic pain, or sharp pain to the eye, or click', or muscle spasm, or an echo/'whisper' inside your mind. Words & pictures both; conversations with friends & family. AI bots substitute similar sounding words on tv instantly (tv reception is on a slight delay); pic/sound breaks to death, suicide, buried, drowned, enemy, ice/fire, thirst/hunger etc. I've actually had conversations' via subvocalising, & via vocalising out, and getting the words in clear, and the notions' back, in the early days, 2012, but pathologically deranged psychopaths who blab-on about how "powerrr"ful & "evil" they are are on the other end as it's a murder program, and they have nothing at all that I want to hear everything they say is shit. A lot of this research is under the PTSD cover; what they intended doing to me, is instilling PTSD to destruction by commanded suicide. AI research is involved too.
The future is now; all that remains to be answered is whether or not ethical considerations will evolve along with the technology, or will simply be bypassed altogether. Given that the U.S. Army is funding this research, those who are skeptical of this technology only being used in a beneficial way have quite a bit of historical precedent upon which to base their concern. Ethical considerations act as a blueprint for what not to do. This is a part of a much greater program, where the operators' use pages from law books as toilet paper, for effect to kill; stalking, poisoning, physical as well as psyche torture, break-ins, tainted food with volatile aromatics, electric shocks, full-body static charging, neighbours who watch you in your own home (and shower) and also ref "death" etc from tv with wall-thumps, Derren Brown tactics the full Zersetzung and much much more.
UW study shows direct brain interface between humans
by Michelle Ma
(Activist Post emphasis added)
In this photo, UW students Darby Losey, left, and Jose Ceballos are positioned in two different buildings on campus as they would be during a brain-to-brain interface demonstration. The sender, left, thinks about firing a cannon at various points throughout a computer game. That signal is sent over the Web directly to the brain of the receiver, right, whose hand hits a touchpad to fire the cannon. Mary Levin, U of Wash.
Sometimes, words just complicate things. What if our brains could communicate directly with each other, bypassing the need for language? As I say, this program' & the technology, were beyond this document in 2011.
University of Washington researchers have successfully replicated a direct brain-to-brain connection between pairs of people as part of a scientific study following the team's initial demonstration a year ago. In the newly published study, which involved six people, researchers were able to transmit the signals from one person's brain over the Internet and use these signals to control the hand motions of another person within a split second of sending that signal. This is potentially an infinite' number of people-to-one in realtime, at the same time, with full read'n'feed' audio/vis & more. The day I was induced' to attempt suicide, I sensed what I thought to be 30 of them', tune-in to experience death from inside my mind & senses they were excitable, I heard their whispers, giggles and foot shuffleings.
At the time of the first experiment in August 2013, the UW team was the first to demonstrate two human brains communicating in this way. The researchers then tested their brain-to-brain interface in a more comprehensive study, published Nov. 5 in the journal PLOS ONE.
"The new study brings our brain-to-brain interfacing paradigm from an initial demonstration to something that is closer to a deliverable technology," said co-author Andrea Stocco, a research assistant professor of psychology and a researcher at UW's Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences. "Now we have replicated our methods and know that they can work reliably with walk-in participants." I suspect this refers to the successful wi-fi/directed energy implantation of cognitive feed into ppl who have not been implanted/impregnated (with nano-tech); I see' this a lot, genuinely ordinary ppl who suddenly use words/phrases that I've been primed/'trained' to recognise as trigger' words, cues and refs., as well as being induced to cough & sneeze it's very much the realization of the dark side of the likes of MK Ultra/Manchurian Candidate/IPCRESS File programs that they can actually put things into ppls minds without them knowing it. As for me, I'm science-minded I knew from the first, that even tho' I'd never heard of any technologies along this line, that what was happening certainly wasn't malevolent gods. Zeros & ones are very plastic, and I knew something about millimetre waves & submarine ELF microwave communications, & one or two other things. Ch4 of book Cruel Britannia is good on the psyche attack methods; Tim Rifat on whale/to is good on the ELF microwave mind control - https://youtu.be/xRsx5egJoYk
Collaborator Rajesh Rao, a UW professor of computer science and engineering, is the lead author on this work.
The research team combined two kinds of noninvasive instruments and fine-tuned software to connect two human brains in real time. The process is fairly straightforward. One participant is hooked to an electroencephalography machine that reads brain activity and sends electrical pulses via the Web to the second participant, who is wearing a swim cap with a transcranial magnetic stimulation coil placed near the part of the brain that controls hand movements.
A transcranial magnetic stimulation coil is placed over the part of the brain that controls the receiver's right hand movements. Mary Levin, U of Wash.
Using this setup, one person can send a command to move the hand of the other by simply thinking about that hand movement. I'm sure that this is so, but they've been guarded on one or two things; glances, smiles/grins; so they set something up in the street, and can induce' a sudden glance sideways at it. I suspect the more in control of your mind that you are, the fewer effects are delivered, but that's a moot point with myself - it means accepting there was a loss of autonomy.
The UW study involved three pairs of participants. Each pair included a sender and a receiver with different roles and constraints. They sat in separate buildings on campus about a half mile apart and were unable to interact with each other in any way except for the link between their brains.
Each sender was in front of a computer game in which he or she had to defend a city by firing a cannon and intercepting rockets launched by a pirate ship. But because the senders could not physically interact with the game, the only way they could defend the city was by thinking about moving their hand to fire the cannon.
The sender is hooked to an electroencephalography machine that reads brain activity. A computer processes the brain signals and sends electrical pulses via the Web to the receiver across campus. Mary Levin, U of Wash. Internal EEG cap
Across campus, each receiver sat wearing headphones in a dark room with no ability to see the computer game with the right hand positioned over the only touchpad that could actually fire the cannon. If the brain-to-brain interface was successful, the receiver's hand would twitch, pressing the touchpad and firing the cannon that was displayed on the sender's computer screen across campus. Cochlear implant, right ear a slight knock to that side of my head causes a long, very hi-pitch tone.
Researchers found that accuracy varied among the pairs, ranging from 25 to 83 percent. Misses mostly were due to a sender failing to accurately execute the thought to send the "fire" command. The researchers also were able to quantify the exact amount of information that was transferred between the two brains.
Another research team from the company Starlab in Barcelona, Spain, recently published results in the same journal showing direct communication between two human brains, but that study only tested one sender brain instead of different pairs of study participants and was conducted offline instead of in real time over the Web. Regular refs; misdirections.
Now, with a new $1 million grant from the W.M. Keck Foundation, the UW research team is taking the work a step further in an attempt to decode and transmit more complex brain processes. Much more as of >2011
With the new funding, the research team will expand the types of information that can be transferred from brain to brain, including more complex visual and psychological phenomena such as concepts, thoughts and rules.
They're also exploring how to influence brain waves that correspond with alertness or sleepiness. Eventually, for example, the brain of a sleepy airplane pilot dozing off at the controls could stimulate the copilot's brain to become more alert. As very deep trance-like unconsciousness can be induced by RF, so too can instant wakefulness (& sleep dep.) by e-caffeine', so that you can be woken to orchestrated skits' or emergency vehicle sirens each day for 6weeks, precisely.
(Read a Scientific American article by Rao and Stocco about possible uses of sending thoughts directly between brains.) Where thought becomes a crime, they can confer on you a death sentence, where, like with me, there is no crime: schiz training', godbluff', psychological & neural research' to destruction, just like Herr Doktor Mengele.
The project could also eventually lead to "brain tutoring," in which knowledge is transferred directly from the brain of a teacher to a student.
"Imagine someone who's a brilliant scientist but not a brilliant teacher. Complex knowledge is hard to explain we're limited by language," said co-author Chantel Prat, a faculty member at the Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences and a UW assistant professor of psychology.
Other UW co-authors are Joseph Wu of computer science and engineering; Devapratim Sarma and Tiffany Youngquist of bioengineering; and Matthew Bryan, formerly of the UW.
The research published in PLOS ONE was initially funded by the U.S. Army Research Office and the UW, with additional support from the Keck Foundation.
They practice on mental patients because no-one will believe them I have a schiz friend, I see them at play inside his mind, taunting me. They can also of course, connect sane minds to chaotic & profoundly insane minds, to force-in the mental disintegration that they work towards achieving; they've done this to me, and I knew what they were doing.
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=8091&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=8091&stc=1)
TOPICS:Activist PostMind Control AUGUST 8, 2013 Activist Post
Bold notes & underlining is true; italics emphasis are all mine: & more than this was possible in >2011
Every day seems to bring new revelations in the area of neuroscience.
image: University of Washington
Over the past year we have learned that scientists have been working on "neural dust" to create a remote-controlled computer pathway to the brain; that scientists have been successful implanting false memories in mice; an experiment at Harvard enabled a human to remote control a mouse by thought alone; and the world's first "telepathic e-mail" was sent.
However, when it was announced last year that remote-controlled humans via the Internet became a reality, it was still met with disbelief. The research team from the University of Washington who conducted this experiment is now announcing that they not only have duplicated their original experiment, but believe that they have moved a step closer to making this a viable technology that could be rolled out in the not-too-distant future. Their full press release with video follows our initial report below.
We recently reported on the release of a secret DARPA mind control program at Arizona State University. Part of that research was focused specifically on the attempt to replicate through language the same results obtained with Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, which is a way to directly control movements, speech, and one's perception of reality via electromagnetic waves aimed at the cerebral cortex. Julie Beal also reported on DARPA's solicitation for portable brain recorders that could eventually be used in every classroom in America. Clearly there is a will to put research into action. Internal EEG & no TMS, unless it's subtle & local.
But so far, the ability to remote control an object from a distance with the mind alone has been limited to video games, drones, and the above-mentioned mouse. However, as you can see in the video below, a human-to-human remote link has been established. A researcher was able to control the hand movements of a person jacked in to the "brain net" in a completely different building: - https://youtu.be/rNRDc714W5I jack/Jack' is a very frequent reference I get; plays to the schiz training' as there are so many confusatory separate meanings.
As is typical, researchers are downplaying the technology by stressing that this type of stimulation is only possible through consenting participants. NO they add it surreptitiously to food and/or put you in a radio-frek induced deep sleepstate, break in to your home, and implant the victim'. Yet they repeatedly tout how wonderful it is because it is "non-invasive." With nanotechnology such as that used in neural dust, a pathway can easily be opened non-invasively (or surreptitiously), and control can be achieved wirelessly. Julie Beal has speculated that perhaps this type of wireless control over another human being's brain contributed to the strange "short circuits" that have been seen in many news reporters. It's no longer beyond the realm of possibility. ?
What once was the craziest of conspiracies has now entered the daily news cycle. And there is more to come:
"The Internet was a way to connect computers, and now it can be a way to connect brains," said researcher Andrea Stocco, assistant professor in psychology at the University of Washington.
[…]
Rao noted that his study managed "a one-way flow of information." It's firewalled; it's 1-way or 2-way by command, A/V
"The next step is having a more equitable two-way conversation directly between the two brains," he said. This is fully established as of at least <2012. This is synthetic telepathy; they' spend 24/7/52/+4 sitting inside your mind, 1-way; they can see what you see, hear what you hear, and are tapped-into the mind itself; the 2-way channel is opened as part of a scheme to drive you out of your own mind, by "malevolent god" impersonators, who reference, by auditory effects and pains everything msg'ful' that you see, hear and think, even the very act of thinking is referenced for purpose of shutting-down the autonomy of your own mind. Every time the tv mentions "death", or when you read the word "suicide" or anything at all related to anything at all bad', you get a reference to it, usually by neuralgic pain, or sharp pain to the eye, or click', or muscle spasm, or an echo/'whisper' inside your mind. Words & pictures both; conversations with friends & family. AI bots substitute similar sounding words on tv instantly (tv reception is on a slight delay); pic/sound breaks to death, suicide, buried, drowned, enemy, ice/fire, thirst/hunger etc. I've actually had conversations' via subvocalising, & via vocalising out, and getting the words in clear, and the notions' back, in the early days, 2012, but pathologically deranged psychopaths who blab-on about how "powerrr"ful & "evil" they are are on the other end as it's a murder program, and they have nothing at all that I want to hear everything they say is shit. A lot of this research is under the PTSD cover; what they intended doing to me, is instilling PTSD to destruction by commanded suicide. AI research is involved too.
The future is now; all that remains to be answered is whether or not ethical considerations will evolve along with the technology, or will simply be bypassed altogether. Given that the U.S. Army is funding this research, those who are skeptical of this technology only being used in a beneficial way have quite a bit of historical precedent upon which to base their concern. Ethical considerations act as a blueprint for what not to do. This is a part of a much greater program, where the operators' use pages from law books as toilet paper, for effect to kill; stalking, poisoning, physical as well as psyche torture, break-ins, tainted food with volatile aromatics, electric shocks, full-body static charging, neighbours who watch you in your own home (and shower) and also ref "death" etc from tv with wall-thumps, Derren Brown tactics the full Zersetzung and much much more.
UW study shows direct brain interface between humans
by Michelle Ma
(Activist Post emphasis added)
In this photo, UW students Darby Losey, left, and Jose Ceballos are positioned in two different buildings on campus as they would be during a brain-to-brain interface demonstration. The sender, left, thinks about firing a cannon at various points throughout a computer game. That signal is sent over the Web directly to the brain of the receiver, right, whose hand hits a touchpad to fire the cannon. Mary Levin, U of Wash.
Sometimes, words just complicate things. What if our brains could communicate directly with each other, bypassing the need for language? As I say, this program' & the technology, were beyond this document in 2011.
University of Washington researchers have successfully replicated a direct brain-to-brain connection between pairs of people as part of a scientific study following the team's initial demonstration a year ago. In the newly published study, which involved six people, researchers were able to transmit the signals from one person's brain over the Internet and use these signals to control the hand motions of another person within a split second of sending that signal. This is potentially an infinite' number of people-to-one in realtime, at the same time, with full read'n'feed' audio/vis & more. The day I was induced' to attempt suicide, I sensed what I thought to be 30 of them', tune-in to experience death from inside my mind & senses they were excitable, I heard their whispers, giggles and foot shuffleings.
At the time of the first experiment in August 2013, the UW team was the first to demonstrate two human brains communicating in this way. The researchers then tested their brain-to-brain interface in a more comprehensive study, published Nov. 5 in the journal PLOS ONE.
"The new study brings our brain-to-brain interfacing paradigm from an initial demonstration to something that is closer to a deliverable technology," said co-author Andrea Stocco, a research assistant professor of psychology and a researcher at UW's Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences. "Now we have replicated our methods and know that they can work reliably with walk-in participants." I suspect this refers to the successful wi-fi/directed energy implantation of cognitive feed into ppl who have not been implanted/impregnated (with nano-tech); I see' this a lot, genuinely ordinary ppl who suddenly use words/phrases that I've been primed/'trained' to recognise as trigger' words, cues and refs., as well as being induced to cough & sneeze it's very much the realization of the dark side of the likes of MK Ultra/Manchurian Candidate/IPCRESS File programs that they can actually put things into ppls minds without them knowing it. As for me, I'm science-minded I knew from the first, that even tho' I'd never heard of any technologies along this line, that what was happening certainly wasn't malevolent gods. Zeros & ones are very plastic, and I knew something about millimetre waves & submarine ELF microwave communications, & one or two other things. Ch4 of book Cruel Britannia is good on the psyche attack methods; Tim Rifat on whale/to is good on the ELF microwave mind control - https://youtu.be/xRsx5egJoYk
Collaborator Rajesh Rao, a UW professor of computer science and engineering, is the lead author on this work.
The research team combined two kinds of noninvasive instruments and fine-tuned software to connect two human brains in real time. The process is fairly straightforward. One participant is hooked to an electroencephalography machine that reads brain activity and sends electrical pulses via the Web to the second participant, who is wearing a swim cap with a transcranial magnetic stimulation coil placed near the part of the brain that controls hand movements.
A transcranial magnetic stimulation coil is placed over the part of the brain that controls the receiver's right hand movements. Mary Levin, U of Wash.
Using this setup, one person can send a command to move the hand of the other by simply thinking about that hand movement. I'm sure that this is so, but they've been guarded on one or two things; glances, smiles/grins; so they set something up in the street, and can induce' a sudden glance sideways at it. I suspect the more in control of your mind that you are, the fewer effects are delivered, but that's a moot point with myself - it means accepting there was a loss of autonomy.
The UW study involved three pairs of participants. Each pair included a sender and a receiver with different roles and constraints. They sat in separate buildings on campus about a half mile apart and were unable to interact with each other in any way except for the link between their brains.
Each sender was in front of a computer game in which he or she had to defend a city by firing a cannon and intercepting rockets launched by a pirate ship. But because the senders could not physically interact with the game, the only way they could defend the city was by thinking about moving their hand to fire the cannon.
The sender is hooked to an electroencephalography machine that reads brain activity. A computer processes the brain signals and sends electrical pulses via the Web to the receiver across campus. Mary Levin, U of Wash. Internal EEG cap
Across campus, each receiver sat wearing headphones in a dark room with no ability to see the computer game with the right hand positioned over the only touchpad that could actually fire the cannon. If the brain-to-brain interface was successful, the receiver's hand would twitch, pressing the touchpad and firing the cannon that was displayed on the sender's computer screen across campus. Cochlear implant, right ear a slight knock to that side of my head causes a long, very hi-pitch tone.
Researchers found that accuracy varied among the pairs, ranging from 25 to 83 percent. Misses mostly were due to a sender failing to accurately execute the thought to send the "fire" command. The researchers also were able to quantify the exact amount of information that was transferred between the two brains.
Another research team from the company Starlab in Barcelona, Spain, recently published results in the same journal showing direct communication between two human brains, but that study only tested one sender brain instead of different pairs of study participants and was conducted offline instead of in real time over the Web. Regular refs; misdirections.
Now, with a new $1 million grant from the W.M. Keck Foundation, the UW research team is taking the work a step further in an attempt to decode and transmit more complex brain processes. Much more as of >2011
With the new funding, the research team will expand the types of information that can be transferred from brain to brain, including more complex visual and psychological phenomena such as concepts, thoughts and rules.
They're also exploring how to influence brain waves that correspond with alertness or sleepiness. Eventually, for example, the brain of a sleepy airplane pilot dozing off at the controls could stimulate the copilot's brain to become more alert. As very deep trance-like unconsciousness can be induced by RF, so too can instant wakefulness (& sleep dep.) by e-caffeine', so that you can be woken to orchestrated skits' or emergency vehicle sirens each day for 6weeks, precisely.
(Read a Scientific American article by Rao and Stocco about possible uses of sending thoughts directly between brains.) Where thought becomes a crime, they can confer on you a death sentence, where, like with me, there is no crime: schiz training', godbluff', psychological & neural research' to destruction, just like Herr Doktor Mengele.
The project could also eventually lead to "brain tutoring," in which knowledge is transferred directly from the brain of a teacher to a student.
"Imagine someone who's a brilliant scientist but not a brilliant teacher. Complex knowledge is hard to explain we're limited by language," said co-author Chantel Prat, a faculty member at the Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences and a UW assistant professor of psychology.
Other UW co-authors are Joseph Wu of computer science and engineering; Devapratim Sarma and Tiffany Youngquist of bioengineering; and Matthew Bryan, formerly of the UW.
The research published in PLOS ONE was initially funded by the U.S. Army Research Office and the UW, with additional support from the Keck Foundation.
They practice on mental patients because no-one will believe them I have a schiz friend, I see them at play inside his mind, taunting me. They can also of course, connect sane minds to chaotic & profoundly insane minds, to force-in the mental disintegration that they work towards achieving; they've done this to me, and I knew what they were doing.
Martin Luther King - "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere."
Albert Camus - "The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion".
Douglas MacArthur — "Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered automatic weapons."
Albert Camus - "Nothing is more despicable than respect based on fear."
Albert Camus - "The only way to deal with an unfree world is to become so absolutely free that your very existence is an act of rebellion".
Douglas MacArthur — "Whoever said the pen is mightier than the sword obviously never encountered automatic weapons."
Albert Camus - "Nothing is more despicable than respect based on fear."