23-02-2016, 10:54 PM
(This post was last modified: 23-02-2016, 11:32 PM by Tom Scully.)
Michael Cross Wrote:Yes, wow.
Look, I don't have a dog in this fight. But you ignored this post:
Jim Hargrove Wrote:Tom Scully Wrote:Mr. Hargrove,
You have taken my unique research specifics, in some excerpts
almost word for word, not only without attribution, but deliberately
associated it with John Armstrong.
To Tom Scully,
I've checked your links and haven't found "almost word for word" copies of your research in John Armstrong's "Postal Money Orders" article that I hid for a week at your request.
Please copy and post in this thread Mr. Armstrong's words that you found so offensive. I plan to unhide Mr. Armstrong's article eventually if you don't respond ....
Jim
And I think, ten more requests. You accused someone of plagiarism. Then you ignored repeated requests for substantiation/clarification. You did that, it's here for all to see:
https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...szPeNzF8bg
It is what it is, but if you accuse someone of plagiarism, in my opinion when asked to show the "word for word" copying of your research, you should reply. The man you accused PULLED the information he had posted while waiting for your reply. To me that seemed like the proper thing to do. In the vacuum you provided afterward, I'm not sure what you expect.
As I said, no dog in this fight, other than objectivity.
Mr. Cross, when someone boldly takes what is yours, do you feel an obligation to repeatedly respond to their requests (demands) to present again, what is obvious to a reasonable person?
We know from the motivation it took to create the very thread we are having this discussion in, that Mr. Hargrove is very sensitive about what he perceives as belonging to him. He does not
even regard being attributed when quoted on another site as a "taking" small enough not to protest about.
....and again, Mr. Cross. I am the unique source of ALL the information in this screenshot excerpt, the entirety of
which I demanded Mr. Hargrove take down. ( see - https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...post106125 )
The irony is you are judging me in a thread Mr. Hargrove initiated to complain about another individual posting material of others WITH ATTRIBUTION. I find your judgment absurd.
This is a January 7, 2016 screenshot of the lower portion of a web page put up by Jim Hargrove and attributed to John Armstrong. The same image is included in my post demanding Hargrove
take down my unique research and the two article images visible in the screenshot, both of which I found and supported my presentation of my unique research.:
When my content is then copied, including the text, almost verbatim, and the image on the right displaying my red highlights, (I also found the other article image**) and attributed to John Armstrong, what would a reasonable describe it as? What additional questions would reasonably be asked, in good faith, subsequently? Mr. Hargrove's pressing me was unreasonable. I am sorry if you do not recognize that fact. You also indicate I forfeited some right or standing by refusing to respond to a man who had presented my unique research and attributed it to someone else, after I posted a screenshot image
defining what had been appropriated from me and intentionally misattributed.
** https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/sho...post104479
See bottom of post, on left.:
Please point out when Mr. Hargrove offered to attribute my research to me.... we are, after all, in a thread objecting to reproducing the mere posts of others, WITH ATTRIBUTION.
Is it not reasonable for me to ask now, considering all you have had to say here, whether you are as unreasonable as Mr. Hargrove is?
Peter Janney's uncle was Frank Pace, chairman of General Dynamics who enlisted law partners Roswell Gilpatric and Luce's brother-in-law, Maurice "Tex" Moore, in a trade of 16 percent of Gen. Dyn. stock in exchange for Henry Crown and his Material Service Corp. of Chicago, headed by Byfield's Sherman Hotel group's Pat Hoy. The Crown family and partner Conrad Hilton next benefitted from TFX, at the time, the most costly military contract award in the history of the world. Obama was sponsored by the Crowns and Pritzkers. So was Albert Jenner Peter Janney has preferred to write of an imaginary CIA assassination of his surrogate mother, Mary Meyer, but not a word about his Uncle Frank.