26-02-2016, 06:00 PM
On Cross Examination, Several questions for Michael Paine (with the understanding I'm asking as a private citizen, not as a representative of this fine Forum)
Now, with that said, Mr. Paine, should you ever venture this way somehow...
*Under the penalty of perjury, Are you sure you met with Lee Harvey Oswald at 214 Neeley Street in April, 1963?
You didn't visit with the wrongfully accused at 214 Neeley Street, Did you?
How could you...At the time of your phantom visit that particular upstairs apartment was inhabited by a family with two young children (the wrongfully accused only had one child at that date and day, Mr. Paine, with his 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] child being born much later in the year in mid-Fall). Are you going to come clean or continue to lie?
Speaking of lying...here's another lie...In your Warren Commission testimony in 1964 you said the wrongfully accused did not have a rifle upon your bogus visit to Neeley Street in April, 1963, yet in two separate interviews some 30 years hence--one in the early 90's and again here in the new millennium--you now say he not only had a rifle but you actually saw it. What's the truth, Mr. Paine? If you lied about that, what else are you lying about?
*In your telephone exchange with your wife Ruth on the afternoon of the assassination, What did you mean by conveying to her that you both knew who really was responsible for the president's demise? Feel free to elaborate, Mr. Paine. Dare you to...
In addition, Why was it so important to you and/or the Warren Commission to try to hide the actual date of this telephone call with your wife? Why was this exchange with your wife bumped ahead an extra day?. Somewhere I'm sure Pinocchio is blushing... Moving along...
*Why are your personal tax returns, including those of your wife Ruth withheld from public scrutiny due to "national security" reasons? No further questions.
--My questions above, Mr. Paine, arose from reading some exemplary research conducted by Mr. DiEugenio (Jim); Mr. Parker (Greg); Mr. Hay (Martin), Mr. Scully (Tom); the late Jim Garrison (RIP), etc. al
IF you find your way to these words, Mr. Paine, remember it's never too late to do the right thing. I know courage like that
doesn't grow on trees, but dare to right this wrong sir if you're a man instead of a mouse. What is it, Mr. Paine?
Cowboy up and come clean, or evoke "national security"?
Now, with that said, Mr. Paine, should you ever venture this way somehow...
*Under the penalty of perjury, Are you sure you met with Lee Harvey Oswald at 214 Neeley Street in April, 1963?
You didn't visit with the wrongfully accused at 214 Neeley Street, Did you?
How could you...At the time of your phantom visit that particular upstairs apartment was inhabited by a family with two young children (the wrongfully accused only had one child at that date and day, Mr. Paine, with his 2[SUP]nd[/SUP] child being born much later in the year in mid-Fall). Are you going to come clean or continue to lie?
Speaking of lying...here's another lie...In your Warren Commission testimony in 1964 you said the wrongfully accused did not have a rifle upon your bogus visit to Neeley Street in April, 1963, yet in two separate interviews some 30 years hence--one in the early 90's and again here in the new millennium--you now say he not only had a rifle but you actually saw it. What's the truth, Mr. Paine? If you lied about that, what else are you lying about?
*In your telephone exchange with your wife Ruth on the afternoon of the assassination, What did you mean by conveying to her that you both knew who really was responsible for the president's demise? Feel free to elaborate, Mr. Paine. Dare you to...
In addition, Why was it so important to you and/or the Warren Commission to try to hide the actual date of this telephone call with your wife? Why was this exchange with your wife bumped ahead an extra day?. Somewhere I'm sure Pinocchio is blushing... Moving along...
*Why are your personal tax returns, including those of your wife Ruth withheld from public scrutiny due to "national security" reasons? No further questions.
--My questions above, Mr. Paine, arose from reading some exemplary research conducted by Mr. DiEugenio (Jim); Mr. Parker (Greg); Mr. Hay (Martin), Mr. Scully (Tom); the late Jim Garrison (RIP), etc. al
IF you find your way to these words, Mr. Paine, remember it's never too late to do the right thing. I know courage like that
doesn't grow on trees, but dare to right this wrong sir if you're a man instead of a mouse. What is it, Mr. Paine?
Cowboy up and come clean, or evoke "national security"?