08-03-2016, 06:23 AM
Michael Cross Wrote:Sigh. So you were somehow able to render exact measurements for every person, step and architectural feature present in the frame, in the required three dimensions, from a tiny amount of poorly rendered digital information? Amazing. Or did you travel back in time and place laser measuring devices on site to allow for such precise information?
No, I won't be joining you elsewhere to discuss any of the "research" done on the tiny two dimensional Darnell frame. Ever.
If you paid more careful attention people have already made those measurements and they are known. Your 'tiny amount' is as self-serving as it is inaccurate. There is more than enough photo data and resolution to see a plainly visible 6-7 inch difference between Frazier and Prayer Man. If you discuss the evidence instead of making excuses you will see this is true. You are obfuscating because the measurements I am citing are easily determinable by sight and do not need any laser accuracy. I have provided enough forensic data to safely place Prayer Man at the front of the landing. Unger and MacRae posted two film clips where the movement allows the eye to see outright that Prayer Man is at the front of the landing. Unger agrees, as do Parker and Kamp. Once you reasonably determine Prayer Man is no more than say 12 inches further back in depth from the lens the perspective difference in not enough to overcome the plainly visible 6-7 inch difference between Prayer Man and Frazier. You are asking for high tech proof while ignoring low tech simple proof. The rules of evidence are wonderful. Low tech validity beats high tech excuses.
I'm afraid this is a done deal if you follow this evidence honestly and accurately.