08-03-2016, 05:06 PM
Ford:
You're just re-entering the same argument. I have already told you that the height argument pre-empts everything you wrote and demands to be answered by the rules of evidence.
Not only do all the main players like Parker, Kamp, and Unger say that Prayer Man is at the front of the landing but all the forensic indicators I listed do too. You have no right to ignore this. What this proves is that, contrary to what Josephs and Cross are alleging, Prayer Man is close enough to the same arc curve in distance from Darnell's lens that no appreciable perspective shift occurs in the Darnell frame that can be used to discount the obvious difference in height between Frazier and Prayer Man. That height difference scientifically excludes Oswald from being Prayer Man at the current available resolution. No metadata or magical ROKC equivocating and spinning is needed to process or realize this.
This evidence finally resolves the Prayer Man issue. Please answer it directly.
I find this less than honest. There's a clearly visible 6-7 inch height difference plainly visible in your own Darnell enlargement on page 5 in this thread. Surely you are not denying this right in its face? What does Josephs always say? "Who are you going to believe, Mr Ford or your own lying eyes?"
An analyst more mindful of his credibility and not seeking the first quick excuse would take notice that the aluminum frames could be used as gauges for Prayer Man's and Frazier's height. This evidence is irrefutable.
You're just re-entering the same argument. I have already told you that the height argument pre-empts everything you wrote and demands to be answered by the rules of evidence.
Not only do all the main players like Parker, Kamp, and Unger say that Prayer Man is at the front of the landing but all the forensic indicators I listed do too. You have no right to ignore this. What this proves is that, contrary to what Josephs and Cross are alleging, Prayer Man is close enough to the same arc curve in distance from Darnell's lens that no appreciable perspective shift occurs in the Darnell frame that can be used to discount the obvious difference in height between Frazier and Prayer Man. That height difference scientifically excludes Oswald from being Prayer Man at the current available resolution. No metadata or magical ROKC equivocating and spinning is needed to process or realize this.
This evidence finally resolves the Prayer Man issue. Please answer it directly.
Quote:Amazing that your eyes can detect height and height differentials from mere photos...
I find this less than honest. There's a clearly visible 6-7 inch height difference plainly visible in your own Darnell enlargement on page 5 in this thread. Surely you are not denying this right in its face? What does Josephs always say? "Who are you going to believe, Mr Ford or your own lying eyes?"
An analyst more mindful of his credibility and not seeking the first quick excuse would take notice that the aluminum frames could be used as gauges for Prayer Man's and Frazier's height. This evidence is irrefutable.