Heads Up!

[Albert Doyle]

Please note the wrongfully accused's Right Elbow, Mr. Doyle ----> No voodoo science needed...just your vision and honesty is all that is required.

No matter how shady a car salesman presents his sales pitch, Mr. Doyle, a lemon is still a lemon (that's why unsuspecting consumers are protected by law).

Once again sir, please note the wrongfully accused's Right Elbow positioned upon the pillar in the photo image above...now, note how far away that pillar is from Mr. Frazier's position on that narrow, restrictive 3 foot plane...in comparison to the pillar, where the wrongfully accused's Right Elbow is positioned.



Thank goodness there are objective researchers in this worthy cause more interested in presenting facts about Prayer Man ----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq than offering mere distortions & misleading distractions.

It is obviously over your head Alan.


In my last post I pointed out to you some very irrefutable science that must be answered to maintain credibility. You ignored it and ridiculed it as a "used car salesmen selling a lemon". That's name-calling in reaction to sound argument and it dismisses its offerer from credibility.


For those who are more reality and intelligent argument oriented:

Mr Ford's claim places Prayer Man slightly over 4 feet from the aluminum frame at the back wall since the landing is about 4 feet wide and Darnell's 20 degree angle adds a little more. This is one side of a scalene triangle Mr Ford refuses to admit.

The next side is the west wall of the portal. This side of the triangle would have to be around 4 feet in length due to the cited science.

The final side of this scalene triangle would be the front edge of the landing. Right angle science could determine the exact length of this side because we know the length of the other two sides.

If we calculated this and determined 1/2 of Prayer Man's body width measured from his anatomical median, you would see that the front landing edge side of this triangle was too long to allow Prayer Man to be leaning against the wall. It's simple science that absolutely disproves Parker's leaning claim.

Mr Ford gives no intelligent answer to this, short of ROKC-like ridicule.

He also completely ignores my forensic science locators that disprove his leaning against the faux brickwork pillar claim via Fratini. My argument proves beyond a doubt Prayer Man would have to be on the first step down to be leaning against the faux pillar. Fratini proves beyond a doubt that Prayer Man is on the landing.

I cite this as open contempt of proven evidence.