Heads Up!

[Albert Doyle]

Let's try it this way Albert: Based on your irrefutable "scientific" evidence, overly the frame with the three dimensional rendering you are using in your "research". Take that tiny two dimensional image and show all of us who are ignorant exactly the dimensions of each architectural/structural element, the distances, the precise placement of the people with respect to elevation, distance from whatever landmark you've chosen. Illuminate us on how you've made this 2D rectangle of shades of gray into a precisely rendered irrefutable 3D model. I'll be waiting . . .

Michael,


I've presented sound scientific arguments you can't just ignore and then construct a photo tech obstacle course for me to run through. I consider it the cheap metadata end-around it is that asks for technical perfection as a ruse to get around not answering good arguments.

I'm sorry but the arguments I made are sound, rely on credible scientific reasoning, and therefore deserve an answer. You're dodging them Mr Cross.


The onus is clearly on you and I take your refusal to directly answer as a sign of my argument's validity and therefore proof. I've already listed enough details for you to not have any excuse to not answer or try to get around it by setting up an evasive quiz. I think it is obvious that you can't disprove anything that I've written and that's why you're doing this. Meanwhile you offer no challenge to Ford, who shows a total lack of grasp of the basic science in the portal and doesn't answer to his mistakes. You pretend to be very particular about strict measurements but never offered any correction to David when he showed a wrong measurement for the landing.


I have proven that Prayer Man is even with Frazier and therefore directly comparable in height as seen in the Darnell frame. Any direct comparison makes it more than clear that Frazier is at least 6-7 inches taller than Prayer Man, therefore dismissing him as being Oswald.


Meanwhile David Josephs' challenge isn't exactly sound. His can photo is probably taken from a camera that is 5 or 10 feet from the cans. As Drew pointed out, Darnell is much further away. Maybe about 100 feet? This means the perspective skewing of the cans is at a much different percentage than the potential skewing that would occur at Darnell's distance.


There's another simple flaw in what David writes. You doubters tend to seek the first quick excuse and think it allows you to dismiss this evidence offhand. Those seeking the truth look deeper and seek confirming evidence. Darnell's lens could probably be easily found out. While David tries to obfuscate by involving irrelevant photo science the truth is we could probably find out exactly what lens the WBAP television crew used and identify its photographic qualities and focal length. But a good photographer would be able to tell by eye anyway just from looking at the image.


This issue is ruled by the internal qualifiers I listed in detail and Mr Josephs categorically ignored. They prove Prayer Man is at the front of the landing and therefore legitimately comparable to Frazier in height.