ATTN: Tom Scully

[Scott Kaiser]

On this past January 7, youwrote on this forum:
Mr. Hargrove,
You have taken my uniqueresearch specifics, in some excerptsalmost word for word, not onlywithout attribution, but deliberatelyassociated it with JohnArmstrong.
Please take down your link toyour web page displaying my unattributed original research detailshere and on the Education Forum, and remove every detail of myoriginal research, and images I am the original presenter of, fromyour web pages.
I "deliberately associated"the article with John Armstrong because he wrote it, and you areclearly making a charge of plagiarism against him! At the time youmade the accusation, John Armstrong had just left for a month longtrip to China, and I was leaving the next morning to spend a week onthe East Coast with my brother and his family. I've always thoughtit was unwise to announce on the Internet that one's home would beempty for some time, and so rather than try to hash this out from theroad, I simply announced I would take the article down until Mr.Armstrong could respond to your accusations.
When I returned, however, I hadtime to follow some ofthe links you presented allegedly showing the plagiarism you haddeclared. I saw no such thing, althoughI did see plenty of words written by John Armstrong that you did notask permission to post. Andso I asked you againand again and again, ten times in fact, in the samethread you made the original accusation, to paste from one ofyour dated posts here the words you claim Mr. Armstrong stole fromyou. You never didso, and after my numerous warnings, I put the article back up.
Now I see you are makingsimilar, defamatory statements about Mr. Armstrong's work in a threadstarted by Alan Ford entitled "Heads Up!" By doing so, youcompletely veered the topic away from the misdeeds of a virulentWarren Commission Apologist on EF, and, as always, you completelyobfuscated evidence for your original charge in your usual cloud ofdust and non-specific data dumps. Do you do ANYTHING here other thantry to criticize John Armstrong?
This is REAL SIMPLE! Copy thewords from one of your dated posts prior to January 7 that you feel JohnArmstrong stole from you, and paste them in this thread. Show us howhe took "excerpts almost word for word" of your research in hisarticle. SHOW US THE ACTUAL WORDS! Don't show us a cloud of dust!
Your charges are clearlydefamatory. For the eleventh time, put up or shut up!

Jim, I can understand your frustration with Tom, he like me can piss people off, except, I have a big mouth, he just has the act for it. So, don't take this post as a defense on his behalf, but unless your material is copyrighted material, there's nothing you can do but to demand he remove it. And, the reason he hasn't if you've already asked him is because he knows this, that means there's no shame in his game.

At least if I ever think that someones material is worth publishing, I make sure to give that person the credit, I don't care about credit, that's not what this is about for me, what I do care about is getting down to the bottom of the truth. I may not ever know who ordered Kennedy's assassination, I may not know who financed it, although, my father talks about Pawley, and I may never know who it was that really pulled the trigger, but I do know who covered it up and why, and everything I've learned in over the pass eight years including talking to many folks is that Oswald didn't do it.

What I don't know personally doesn't mean I will not expose everything my father knew personally, and there is a lot of material, new material I discovered regarding my father, so I can't say I'm (first hand accounts to the events), however, I am first hand information regarding my father.