Heads Up!

[Albert Doyle]

Perhaps this will get me banned, or a time out from this forum, but if so, that's fine. You sir are a liar. I am not going to go back to cut and paste the series of accurate and well thought rebuttals to the horse shit you purvey, but they are in this thread and others for all to see. Your contention that you've been ignored, that your "science" is irrefutable is a lie. Your "points" have been completely countered with evidence. The fact that you either ignore them or don't understand them changes nothing. Your "forensic" points are opinion, have no science behind them and are entirely worthless. David's focal point example was not a canard. It was IN FACT science, and any objective observer would have paused to ponder the implications of how the appearance of three dimensional space can be altered in a two dimensional representation by the length of a lens. This is PROVEN SCIENCE. That you call it a canard exposes you for the charlatan you've always appeared to be.

*edit for spelling.

You're just opinionating harder Michael.

Please, go back and show where I lied or was disproven by David's way too irrelevant and unrelated focal point science.

Read my last post about Darnell's lens and Robardeau's map and stop hiding behind your totally disconnected and unrelated 3d in 2d bluff. You are simply not answering my internal forensic qualifiers that disprove what you're saying. I accused you of ignoring them and you responded by ignoring them again. Drew doesn't seem to have any problem admitting it.

Really, obvious ROKC proxies should not be allowed to lower the quality of this board. You got away with this last time. This time the science you are bloviating around disproves you.