Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ATTN: Tom Scully
#3
I'm not sure you understand my point, Scott.


By claiming that John Armstrong stole "almost word for word" excerpts of his own "unique research," Tom Scully quite obviously is accusing John of plagiarism. I have asked a dozen or more times now for Mr. Scully to give an example of this theft by presenting the words Mr. Armstrong allegedly stole, but he has neglected to do so. Because they don't exist.


Most recently, his endless attacks on John also served to distract attention from the original subject of Alan Ford's thread entitled "Heads Up!" By his usual tactics of attacking John Armstrong, Mr. Scully has once again changed the subject from dirty tricks promoted by Warren Commission apologists to something else--something all about himself. Mission accomplished!


Mr. Scully's accusations are clearly libelous.
HarveyandLee.net

Chief Justice Earl Warren: "Full disclosure was not possible for reasons of national security." – 1964
CIA accountant James B. Wilcott: Oswald received "a full-time salary for agent work for doing CIA operational work." – 1978
HSCA counsel Robert Tanenbaum: “Lee Harvey Oswald was a contract employee of the CIA and the FBI.” – 1996
Reply


Messages In This Thread
ATTN: Tom Scully - by Jim Hargrove - 11-03-2016, 07:46 PM
ATTN: Tom Scully - by Scott Kaiser - 11-03-2016, 07:57 PM
ATTN: Tom Scully - by Jim Hargrove - 12-03-2016, 03:12 PM
ATTN: Tom Scully - by Scott Kaiser - 12-03-2016, 06:45 PM
ATTN: Tom Scully - by Jim Hargrove - 12-03-2016, 11:30 PM
ATTN: Tom Scully - by Jim Hargrove - 14-03-2016, 02:07 AM
ATTN: Tom Scully - by Michael Cross - 14-03-2016, 04:30 PM
ATTN: Tom Scully - by Scott Kaiser - 14-03-2016, 06:02 PM
ATTN: Tom Scully - by Jim Hargrove - 14-03-2016, 11:12 PM
ATTN: Tom Scully - by Jim Hargrove - 28-03-2016, 03:27 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)