12-03-2016, 06:45 PM
Jim Hargrove Wrote:I'm not sure you understand my point, Scott.
By claiming that John Armstrong stole "almost word for word" excerpts of his own "unique research," Tom Scully quite obviously is accusing John of plagiarism. I have asked a dozen or more times now for Mr. Scully to give an example of this theft by presenting the words Mr. Armstrong allegedly stole, but he has neglected to do so. Because they don't exist.
Most recently, his endless attacks on John also served to distract attention from the original subject of Alan Ford's thread entitled "Heads Up!" By his usual tactics of attacking John Armstrong, Mr. Scully has once again changed the subject from dirty tricks promoted by Warren Commission apologists to something else--something all about himself. Mission accomplished!
Mr. Scully's accusations are clearly libelous.
I understand, it is truthfully sad that a good president, with good intentions got assassinated, it's even worst when others who calls themselves researchers are out to assassinate others because of the assassination. I wonder if there will ever come a day when everyone wants to come together to sign a petition and have these documents fully released rather then focusing on who started the petition, would it matter? Perhaps, to some.
From what I have seen over the years, there is more than enough people to get the government involved again. Time is running out, October 17, 2017 will be here in two years, if no one starts something NOW it will be to late. And, as a reminder which many of you are already familiar with the 1992 JFK Act requires that ALL document shall be released in full.
I'm only sorry there are some folks like Tom out there, perhaps, their ways can change. Tom, if I can change, not who I was four years ago as you put it, and people can change, so can you.