12-03-2016, 10:15 PM
Alan Ford Wrote:On the contrary, Mr. Doyle, the object closest to the camera appears taller (Mr. Darnell wasn't filming backwards with the wrongfully accused closer to him, his filming panned from your right to left, Mr. Frazier to Mr. Oswald and beyond). Just curious, Which is taller a person taking a selfie far away from the Empire State Building or just outside its entrance doors?
Any honest thoughts on Mr. Cook's right elbow alignment, his feet, the exact same pillar position as the wrongfully accused?
Except, Mr Ford, that there's no "contrary" about it. If you bothered to read what I said accurately you would see that is what I was saying. You apparently have comprehension problems because it was me who was pointing out that YOU failed to realize the internal flaw in your statement. Not only do you get your science wrong but then you get your explanation of it confused too. If you bothered to interpret this correctly it was actually you who failed to comprehend that what you posted works in my favor. Like you are confirming above, if Prayer Man was well forward of Frazier any alleged perspective distortion would work in my favor. Like you said, it would make him appear taller, which would only increase the difference in height between him and the taller Frazier, who, by your own perspective claims, would be shorter. Any alleged perspective distortion would work in my favor in that configuration and only exaggerate the height difference.
You really don't get this do you Alan?
Quote:(Mr. Darnell wasn't filming backwards with the wrongfully accused closer to him, his filming panned from your right to left, Mr. Frazier to Mr. Oswald and beyond)
This statement shows you don't have a competent grasp of the evidence. All that matters here is your claim that Prayer Man is well forward of Frazier at a 45 degree angle in the Darnell frame.