13-03-2016, 08:48 PM
From where I'm sitting Mr. Josephs has made every good faith attempt to help you comprehend matters beyond your scope, Mr. Doyle. Ditto for Mr. Cross, who has asked you in a fair and reasonable manner as well to simply take into account photographic dynamics in play. Rather than afford either of these gentlemen the courtesy to even consider their input you've done quite the opposite, Mr. Doyle. Any genuine evaluation should include an open and fair exchange, not a my way or the highway diatribe.
Now, moving along, Still reluctant to work in the full equation eh?
Of course, because to include all of the dynamics within the following photo would mean you would have to account for photographic evidence that debunks your "proof" (the thing about aluminum, Mr. Doyle, is it isn't set in stone ----->
![[Image: attachment.php?attachmentid=8223&stc=1]](https://deeppoliticsforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=8223&stc=1)
*Credit Prayer Man website
Item (1) How about an honest accounting for the woman upon the 4th step, merely just halfway through her ascent upwards, already with her head aligned with Mr. Oswald's mid-section?
Item (2) How about an honest accounting of why even after we move her over to the right along the same plane, she has at least two human figures between her and Mr. Frazier?
Yet, no such blockage of human mass separates her from Mr. Oswald's mid-section. Why?, Mr. Doyle...Has it dawned upon you that perhaps the world is round after all?
You introduced the dynamics of measurements into this matter....Why are you so reluctant now to address the measurements contrary to your "proof"?
Offer at least an explanation...just don't sell us the idea that she's 7'4" tall or endowed with an extensively looong neck, Mr. Doyle, enabling her to crane upwards and over the remaining steps to navigate far enough away to reach Mr. Frazier's position way up there in the rear shadows. Try to refrain from addressing me, Mr. Josephs or Mr. Cross, etc. on rebuttal as much as simply addressing the measurements depicted in the photo, which speaks for itself. Well, How do you account for item 1 and Item 2, Mr. Doyle?
An objective Q & A relative to Prayer Man is just a click away -----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq
Now, moving along, Still reluctant to work in the full equation eh?
Of course, because to include all of the dynamics within the following photo would mean you would have to account for photographic evidence that debunks your "proof" (the thing about aluminum, Mr. Doyle, is it isn't set in stone ----->
*Credit Prayer Man website
Item (1) How about an honest accounting for the woman upon the 4th step, merely just halfway through her ascent upwards, already with her head aligned with Mr. Oswald's mid-section?
Item (2) How about an honest accounting of why even after we move her over to the right along the same plane, she has at least two human figures between her and Mr. Frazier?
Yet, no such blockage of human mass separates her from Mr. Oswald's mid-section. Why?, Mr. Doyle...Has it dawned upon you that perhaps the world is round after all?
You introduced the dynamics of measurements into this matter....Why are you so reluctant now to address the measurements contrary to your "proof"?
Offer at least an explanation...just don't sell us the idea that she's 7'4" tall or endowed with an extensively looong neck, Mr. Doyle, enabling her to crane upwards and over the remaining steps to navigate far enough away to reach Mr. Frazier's position way up there in the rear shadows. Try to refrain from addressing me, Mr. Josephs or Mr. Cross, etc. on rebuttal as much as simply addressing the measurements depicted in the photo, which speaks for itself. Well, How do you account for item 1 and Item 2, Mr. Doyle?
An objective Q & A relative to Prayer Man is just a click away -----> http://www.reopenkennedycase.org/prayer-man-faq