Heads Up!

[Michael Cross]

Yes David. Again you're spot on. I can't for the life of me understand why this disinfo is allowed to continue.

If you honestly reviewed this thread, each and every time I asked Mr Cross to qualify that vs my arguments he fled.


It would be in the interest of those failing the arguments to call for a closing of the discussion.


Honestly, ROKC proxying should not be allowed on this issue.


Mr Cross insults the intelligence of the readers by daring to offer this vs what I wrote.


Cheerleading is not a credibly enterable level of discussion at this point in comparison to the arguments being made.



.

I don't flee. I tire of your boorish bullshit.

There's no reason to continually provide rebuttals to refute your imaginary proof. It only takes ONE accurate rebuttal to do so; your crap never changes. You claim you're right because you're right. Also, and this is becoming more and more apparent, your response to the rebuttals that are carefully offered smacks of a disinformation agent:

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2012/08/bran...-it-works/

ROKC proxy, I'm a member there, haven't posted or read anything in over a month (not sure I ever posted). Your accusation is without merit - its an attempt to distract from the point at hand, which is that your entire argument is invalid. EVERY POINT you've tried to make has been refuted in detail; in response you dismiss the truth by relying on various disnfo tactics - like trying to discredit your detractors by calling them proxies of another forum. Your "geometry" is by DEFINITION based on assumptions of placement and size. You don't have a laser grid of the space, you don't have actual positions of the people that were there, you have assumptions and estimations.

Proof is derived from absolutes, not estimations. THEORIES are derived from estimations.

You have nothing, and your attempt to discredit me or David by trying to associate me/us with another forum is an indication of the lack of depth of your position. If the "readers" think I'm insulting their intelligence by calling you on the bullshit you purvey, they are welcome to chime in. All I see in this thread Albert is a moderator that agreed with David, Jim D doing the same, Alan agreeing with us and another member astutely pointing out that there are no people in the Darnell image - there are shades of gray in arrangements that represent people in two dimensions. I don't see a rush of Brian/Albert supporters queueing up to tout the relevancy of the crap you purvey.